Green Car Congress  
Go to GCC Discussions forum About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Hitachi establishes European Nuclear Research Centre | Main | KIT and Evonik researchers develop novel polymer network that self heals rapidly and repeatedly at relatively low temperatures »

Print this post

World Bank/ICCT report provides guidance to reducing black carbon emissions from diesels in developing countries

14 April 2014

Worldbank
Historical Trends in Black Carbon Emissions from Surface Transportation (teragrams of black carbon per year). Source: Minjares et al. Click to enlarge.

The World Bank has published a report, undertaken by a team from the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), intended to inform efforts to control black carbon emissions from diesel-based transportation in developing countries. The report proposes approaches for integrating black carbon emission reduction considerations in cost-benefit assessment and applies an analytic framework to four simulated projects to illustrate the associated opportunities and challenges at a project level.

The transportation sector accounted for approximately 19% of global black carbon emissions in the year 2000, according to the report. Road transportation accounted for 9% of global black carbon, with diesel engines responsible for nearly 99% of those emissions. In the near term, black carbon emissions from mobile engines are projected to decline as a consequence of policies implemented in the US, Canada, Europe, and Japan. However, black carbon emissions are projected to increase in the next decade as vehicle activity increases, particularly in East and South Asia.

Worldbank2
Global black carbon emissions from transportation by region among top 10 motorized regions, 2000-2050. Source: Minjares et al., data from Facanha et al. (2012). Click to enlarge.

Black carbon has been found to be second to carbon dioxide in terms of its climate forcing. (Earlier post.) Black carbon is 3,200 times more effective on a mass-equivalent basis than carbon dioxide in causing climate impacts within 20 years, and 900 times more effective within 100 years.

Black carbon increases global and regional temperatures when emitted into the atmosphere, where individual particles directly absorb energy from the sun and radiate it back as heat. Black carbon also reduces the strong cooling effect of large, highly reflective surfaces such as glaciers and Arctic ice. High concentrations of black carbon in the atmosphere can change precipitation patterns and reduce the amount of radiation that reaches the Earth’s surface, which affects local agriculture.

In addition to the climate effects, exposure to particulate matter is associated with a range of diseases, including chronic bronchitis and asthma, as well as premature deaths from cardiopulmonary disease, lung cancer, and acute lower respiratory infections.

In 2012 the International Agency for Research on Cancer re-categorized diesel engine exhaust as carcinogenic to humans based on evidence that sufficient exposure is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. (Earlier post.)

Controlling diesel black carbon emissions in developed countries has successfully relied on fuel quality improvements and vehicle emissions standards. Such standards require new vehicles to be equipped with filters and to use ultra-low-sulfur diesel (ULSD). This enables the use of diesel particulate filters and the adoption of strict emissions standards (e.g., Euro 6/VI). However, the report notes, refinery investment in upgrades or importation are key to the availability of ULSD in developing countries.

Furthermore, the report notes, no developing country has adopted fuel and vehicle standards equivalent to Euro 6/VI. Among non-OECD countries, Brazil has adopted the most stringent fuel and vehicle standards, followed closely by Russia. Brazil may adopt more stringent fuel quality standards by 2015; similarly tough vehicle standards are less certain, according to the authors.

China and India have made significant progress in moving to Euro 4/IV standards for light- and heavy-duty vehicles; some major cities, including Delhi and Beijing, have taken steps to advance beyond the national requirements.

Implementation of improved fuel and vehicle standards, which requires both government regulation and enforcement, may be difficult however in regions where governance is weak and technical capacity is limited. Emissions control strategies should be both sensitive to local needs and aim for maximum feasible reductions guided by best practices. Policy roadmaps can be a useful tool in providing greater predictability of interventions.

—“Reducing Black Carbon Emissions from Diesel Vehicles”

Other programs can provide significant benefits, such as vehicle scrappage and replacement, inspection and maintenance, and vehicle retrofitting, the report suggested. Complementary policies to limit growth in travel demand and long-term growth in emissions include fuel taxation, congestion charging, and logistics management, among other strategies.

Cost benefit. This study applied a new cost-benefit analysis methodology to four simulated diesel black carbon emissions control projects—diesel retrofit in Istanbul; green freight (plus retrofit) in São Paulo; fuel and vehicle standards in Jakarta; and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) buses in Cebu—taking into account the additional climate benefits of black carbon reductions.

The study found that for some projects, the net benefits were positive only when assuming a large benefit from black carbon control on the climate in the near term (using 20 years Global Warming Potential or GWP) and a low social cost-of-carbon discount rate.

The analysis demonstrates that consideration of black carbon may make some projects viable that otherwise would not be considered worthwhile. While investments in many diesel emissions control projects can be justified without the consideration of black carbon, the inclusion of black carbon into a cost-benefit modeling framework was found to provide a more comprehensive assessment. In two of the four cases the health benefits of diesel emissions control alone were substantial enough to justify the interventions; the other two projects became viable only with the inclusion of climate benefits.

Further work is needed to fully test this methodological framework with real-world projects and to establish clearer guidelines for the incorporation of black carbon into cost-benefit analysis. Additional work is also needed to narrow the range of assumptions for the discount rate tied to the social cost of carbon as well as the Global Warming Potential. Importantly, a social cost of black carbon needs to be developed and alternative methodologies need to be explored whereby temperature response and damage functions (for climate impacts) are applied.

—“Reducing Black Carbon Emissions from Diesel Vehicles”

Resources

April 14, 2014 in Climate Change, Diesel, Emissions, Fuels, Health, Policy | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef01a3fcee5fda970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference World Bank/ICCT report provides guidance to reducing black carbon emissions from diesels in developing countries:

Comments

Good to see this evil stinking stuff properly identified with the damage it causes. However, no mention of any scheme to help all those in under-developed countries who would have no mobility without their older, un filtered diesels, often powering not only their transport but agricultural machines as well. Talk of scrappage or retrofitting implies a cost which such people will rarely be able to bear. And also, no mention of any analysis of just what proportion of these emissions derive from those sources.

It is somewhat misleading when they extrapolate trends as far as to 2050 without considering that strict emission norms will also be applied in developing countries, albeit with some delay in comparison to Europe, Japan and the USA. We know that this will happen soon in, e.g. both China and India, and here is where we have two of the gross polluters in the graph. Thus, this graph will look completely different in just a few years – not to mention 2050 – which makes such a long extrapolation rather pointless.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Green Car Congress © 2013 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group