USDA to invest up to $100M to boost infrastructure for renewable fuel use; seeks to double number of higher blend ethanol fuel pumps
Voith receives order for high-volume production of CFRP components for future Audi model

University of Maryland team creates solid-state Li-ion battery out of one material

UMD Engineers made a battery of all one material simply by sprinkling carbon (red) into each side of a new material (blue) that forms the electrolyte and both electrodes at the ends of the battery. Credit: Maryland NanoCenter Click to enlarge.

Engineers at the University of Maryland have created a solid-state Li-ion battery that is made entirely out of one material. Chunsheng Wang, a professor in the University of Maryland’s Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and his team have made a single material that incorporates the properties of both electrodes (cathode and anode) and electrolyte.

The new material consists of a mix of sulfur, germanium, phosphorus and lithium (Li10GeP2S12). This compound is used as the ion-moving electrolyte. At each end, the scientists added carbon to form electrodes that push the ions back and forth through the electrolyte as the battery charges and discharges. The Li–S and Ge–S components in Li10GeP2S12 act as the active centers for its cathode and anode performance, respectively.

In a paper published in the journal Advanced Materials, the team reported that the single-Li10GeP2S12 battery exhibits a remarkably low interfacial resistance due to the improvement of interfacial contact and interactions, and the suppression of interfacial strain/stress.

All-solid-state lithium-ion batteries are of interest for energy storage systems because the replacement of the volatile and flammable liquid electrolyte with nonflammable inorganic solid electrolyte could improve safety and reliability.

Conventional solid-state batteries comprise the three fundamental battery components—anode, electrolyte, and cathode—normally using three different materials. The electrodes are expected to be reversibly lithiated/delithiated at a low potential (anode) or a high potential (cathode) with good mixed electronic/ionic conductivities, whereas the electrolyte should have a wide electrochemical stability window with a very high ionic conductivity but negligible electronic conductivity.

To develop a highly performed ASSLIB [all solid-state lithium-ion battery], two critical challenges have to be overcome: one is the high ionic resistance of the solid electrolyte and the other is the large interfacial resistance between the solid electrodes and solid electrolyte. Because of the great success in minimizing the solid electrolyte thickness based on a series of advanced deposition techniques, thin-fi lm ASSLIBs (total thickness ≈15 µm) using low-conductivity solid electrolyte … have received extensive research. Despite excellent cycle stability, the limited stored energy and the expensive, multistep fabrication process of this thin-film battery are still the main obstacles toward their wide applications.

Increasing the thickness of the electrodes and electrolyte to make the so-called bulk-type ASSLIBs is highly desired for their widespread use in the large-scale energy storage systems. However, the performances of this type of battery, especially in terms of power density and cycle life, are too low for their practical applications. This is because the increase in the thickness of the battery would require a high ionic conductivity of the solid electrolyte and a very low interfacial resistance between the electrodes and electrolyte.

—Han et al.

The Maryland team took a radically different approach to solve the problem of what happens at the interface between the electrolyte and the electrode. Because Han and Wang’s battery is all one material, energy can flow through without a lot of resistance. This means that the battery easily charges up and discharges smoothly.

To my knowledge, there has never been any similar work reported. It could lead to revolutionary progress in area of solid state batteries.

—Dr. Kang Xu of the Army Research Laboratory, a researcher peripherally related to the study

Our battery is 600 microns thick, about the size of a dime, whereas conventional solid state batteries are thin films—forty times thinner. This means that more energy can be stored in our battery.

—Fudong Han, the first author of the paper

Though the battery is extremely easy to make—a powder compressed in a plastic and steel cylinder—it is still at the proof-of-concept stage, Han said. The researchers are testing its cycle life to see if it is a viable candidate for manufacturing.

Sulfide-based compounds are not particularly environmentally friendly materials, Han noted. The team will next try to use oxides, which do not degrade into a poisonous gas.

The research was done as part of the Nanostructures for Electrical Energy Storage (NEES) project from the Department of Energy, and is also funded by the National Science Foundation.


  • Fudong Han, Tao Gao, Yujie Zhu, Karen J. Gaskell, and Chunsheng Wang (2015) “A Battery Made from a Single Material” Adv. Mater. doi: 10.1002/adma.201500180


> Record of Account Transcript - combines the information from both the tax account and tax return transcripts.

Oh man. I was so excited about that for a minute.

> The team will next try to use oxides, which do not degrade into a poisonous gas.


> The team will next try to use oxides, which do not degrade into a poisonous gas.

Wouldn't this be a potential problem for all sulphur batteries?
The lack of energy density data or even voltage makes you wonder. It's cool tech nonetheless. Can you imagine making a battery that just involves pressing a powder between aluminum and copper foil. Cheap cheap cheap.


Don't get excited, it's been ton of promising articles about a good battery and that since more than 7 years and when you really take a cold look at it you realize that actual batteries are not wanted by whoever and they never gonna discover a good battery ever. All this sad story is just a big subsidized dream that go nowhere like nasa and their costly moon trip without good results.

STOP giving subsidies to this costly project that go nowhere. This is a fraud project out of control. Battery cars are bad and nobody want them. Also it's plainly impossible to implement a recharging infrastructure because it charge slowly and many many car drivers park in the street or a big building common parking lot especially out of Canada and u.s.a.


@Sublime voltage (around 1.5-3.5V) and energy densities are pretty low, but the article is a proof of concept. I don't think they aim any commercialization of the system.



You have NO idea what this university spent nor where the money came from, so keep the negative comments to yourself.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)