Uber, Lyft respond to Trump ban on entry to US from targeted countries
Study offers new insights into solidification cracking during welding of steel

Researchers find shade from stand density can cost farmers about 10% of potential crop yield

A team from the University of Illinois has found that compared to top leaves, the shaded lower level leaves of C4 crops planted in dense stands such as corn and Miscanthus underperform, costing farmers about 10% of potential yield.

These findings, published in an open-access paper in the Journal of Experimental Botany, could help scientists further boost the yields of corn and Miscanthus, as well as other C4 crops that have evolved to photosynthesize more efficiently than C3 plants such as wheat and rice.

In modern intensive systems, crops form dense canopies where both sun and shade leaves contribute to photosynthetic carbon assimilation and productivity. Shaded leaves are estimated to contribute about 50% of total canopy carbon gain and therefore the efficiency with which shade leaves use light is a critical factor determining crop yield potential.

… With the perceived need to increase crop production, given forecasts of future demand, it becomes increasingly important to understand leaf photosynthetic shade response of major C4 crops and in turn whether this could affect canopy photosynthesis and productivity.

—Pignon et al.

The study found that when top and bottom leaves are placed in the same low light, the lower canopy leaves showed lower rates of photosynthesis. Shaded corn leaves are 15% less efficient than top leaves—and worse, lower leaves are 30% less efficient than the top leaves of Miscanthus, a perennial bioenergy crop that is 60% more productive than corn in Illinois.

Considering the crop as a whole, this loss of efficiency in lower leaves may costs farmers about 10% of potential yield—a cost that will increase as planting density increases. This likely applies to other C4 relatives, such as sugarcane and sorghum.

The wild ancestors of C4 crops are thought to have grown as individuals in open habitats where the number of leaves that they produced would have been limited by water and nitrogen and most leaves would be exposed to full sunlight.

Today we grow these crops in ever denser stands, and provide them with nitrogen and water so that they can produce many more layers of leaves. But as a result, the proportion of leaves that are shaded has increased, and the production of grain will depend more and more on the contribution of this increasing proportion of shaded leaves.

—principal investigator Steve Long

First author Charles Pignon, a doctoral candidate in the crop sciences and at the Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, explained that the loss in efficiency in the lower canopy was not due to the leaf senescing and dying off. The leaves were still perfectly healthy when examined.

Next, it will be important to find out why this loss in efficiency occurs and if there’s any way that we can fix it, since overcoming this and gaining a 10% increase in production would be very significant.

—Charles Pignon

This work was supported by the Energy Biosciences Institute (EBI). The EBI is a public-private collaboration supported from BP.

Resources

  • Charles P. Pignon, Deepak Jaiswal, Justin M. McGrath, Stephen P. Long (2017) “Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C4 crops?” J Exp Bot 68 (2): 335-345. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw456

Comments

SJC

Leaving stover on the field keeps the ground cold which prevents early planting. Taking all the stover and planting a cover crop works better.

mahonj

If you increased the gap between the rows 10%, would you get a 10% improvement in yield ?
I doubt it.
A graph of yield vs plant density would be useful.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)