Protean Electric & Zhejiang VIE Science & Technology partner to develop 16" version of in-wheel motor
Neste publishes updated info about crude palm oil suppliers; feedstock for renewable diesel

Ford favoring bulk-type solid-state battery for next-gen energy storage

Ford is exploring a variety of “beyond Li-ion” solutions, including Lithium-sulfur, Lithium-air and solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Of those, Ford is currently favoring a solid-state solution for several reasons, among them the better volumetric energy density this approach offers, said Ford engineer Venkat Anandan in a presentation at SAE WCX 17 in Detroit this week.

A Li-air battery, with its air cathode, is a low-cost system, Anandan said. It also offers a high theoretical specific energy density. Because the technology is similar to that of fuel cells, some of the design and engineering work that has already gone into fuel cells could be adapted for Li-air, he said. However, key drawbacks to the Li-air system are its relatively low practical energy density, low cycle life and the complexity of the system, Anandan said.

Li-sulfur is also a low-cost system due to the low cost of sulfur, also offers high energy density, Anandan said. Its key challenge is the accumulation of polysulfides, leading to curtailed cycle life.

Solid-state use solid electrodes and a solid electrolyte material. The solid electrolytes are stable and remove the flammability concerns associated with liquid electrolytes. However, SSBs suffer from low current density, and low cycle life. Scalability, in terms of manufacturing for mass automotive adoption, is also an unknown.

All of the advanced battery systems use Li metal anodes to provide high energy density, Anandan noted.

Solid state is the one lead system that we know right now could offer higher volumetric energy density and safety than all the other systems out there. None of the technologies are ready right now.

—Venkat Anandan

Solid-state batteries have been around for decades; one of the most successful types is the thin film SSB, with an electrode stack of ~ 50 microns. However, energy density is low as is its current density.

One of the solid-state designs that might be applicable for EVs is the bulk-type solid-state battery. The electrode thickness is more than 50 microns. With an electrode thickness of more than 50 microns, we can get an energy density that could be useful for vehicle applications. The bulk-type solid state battery could meet automotive design targets.

—Venkat Anandan

The solid electrolyte should have ionic conductivity of more than 10-4, he said, should be stable with the active materials, have good mechanical properties, and be readily manufacturable.

Ford found that lithium lanthium zirconia oxide (LLZO) electrolytes could meet most of those criteria. One of Ford’s university partners demonstrated that LLZO can be sintered into thin sheets of around 150-200 microns in thickness and conductivity of 10-4. Although this is not yet meeting Ford’s targets, Anandan believes it can be achieved.

In November 2016, Ford was awarded a patent on a solid-state battery design (US 20160329594 A1) with Anandan and his colleague Andrew Drews as the inventors. This was followed in January 2017 with a patent (US20170012319 A1) for a flexible composite solid state battery, with Anandan and Drews again the inventors.



It's been more than 100 years that they TRY to construct a good battery for a car and they are still in the complete dark, i won't buy anything because of low cycle life and denthrite and lithignation. As for gasoline ice, only the smallest system can offer some mpg because it's ainÀ't performing and efficient so just buy the smallest and cheapest and drive it slow. Actually consumers over spend and don't enjoy their costly cars. It's time to ditch all luxury car and adopt efficiency by choosing a Hyundai accent as the main car and keep it for 20 years.


Not quite ready to get out of the lab?


Lithium sulfur may be the next candidate.


The Argonne Labs have been working on these same battery chemistries for 4 years now and have yet to bring one to market. Me thinks this is all so much vapor by VW...again.


My posting about Dyson/Sakti3 did not show up.
Dyson will not license the University patents, that is all.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)