Green Car Congress  
Home Topics Archives About Contact  RSS Headlines

« DOE: despite 13% rise in VMT from 2002-2015, pollution down significantly | Main | Lygos partners with Agile BioFoundry and DOE to accelerate bioproduct R&D and commercialization; two-year, $5M pilot collaboration »

Print this post

Trump Administration approves expansion of Enbridge Alberta Clipper oil sands pipeline across Canadian border

17 October 2017

The Trump Administration has issued a Presidential Permit authorizing Enbridge to expand the Alberta Clipper (Line 67) pipeline that crosses the US-Canada border near Neche, ND, to a capacity of up to 888,889 barrels barrels per day. (Earlier post.)

In 2009, the State Department had issued a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, operation and maintenance of the 36-inch diameter Line 67 pipeline extending between the US-Canada border near Neche, ND and the first US mainline shut off valve or pumping station in the United States.

That near-border segment of the Pipeline authorized by the 2009 Permit is only 3 miles long. Enbridge constructed the remainder of the Line 67 Pipeline in the United States to its southern terminus at Superior, Wisconsin, pursuant to other local, state and federal permits. Enbridge completed construction and began operations of Line 67 (Alberta Clipper) in 2010; the pipeline currently transports an average annual capacity of approximately 495,000 bpd of crude oil across the border.

In 2012, Enbridge requested that the US Department of State issue a new Presidential Permit to authorize Enbridge to operate the border segment of its existing Line 67 crude oil pipeline up to its full design capacity. Full design capacity for Line 67 is 880,000 bpd for heavy crude. (This will vary based on the type of product transported. For example, the full design capacity of Line 67 would be greater than 880,000 bpd were light crudes transported on the line, which could be case in the future, the company noted.)

October 17, 2017 in Brief | Permalink | Comments (3)

Comments

Finally a politician with enough guts to authorize the safest way to transport liquid fuel (pipelines).

In Canada, our politicians would sit on it for decades, just in case natives or greens object.

When OIL runs out, will all those pipelines be used to transport H2O to dry areas?

Harvey,

Becoming a Trump fan will not serve you well.

With the cancellation of most new pipelines in Canada, more trains will have to be used to transport Oil from Coast to Coast for the next 20 to 40 years.

Lac Megatic (summer of 2015) accident with (47 fatalities and $500+M property damages) will be repeated more often. As usual, the railroad went bankrupt and tax payers will have to pay instead of the Oil Industry.

An alternative would be a multi billion dollars protection fund or insurance paid (100%) by the Oil Industry? Price of heating Oil, gasoline and diesel would be increased by 1% to 2%. Not enough for users to switch to electrified vehicles.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Green Car Congress © 2017 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group