LA Metro and Via Join partner to offer shared rides to select transit stations; $1.35M grant
IH2 technology licensed to Biozin Holding AS for production of liquid transportation fuels from woody biomass

Jülich, ORNL researchers advance high energy density iron-air batteries

In a new study published in the journal Nano Energy, researchers from Forschungszentrum Jülich in Germany and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) provide in-depth insight into the electrochemically induced surface reaction processes on iron anodes in concentrated alkaline electrolyte in iron-air batteries.

Using in-situ electrochemical atomic force microscopy (in-situ EC-AFM) at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences at ORNL, they were able to observe how deposits of iron hydroxide particles (Fe(OH)2) form at the iron electrode under conditions similar to those prevalent during charging and discharging. A deeper understanding of the charging and discharging reactions is viewed as the key for the further development of this type of rechargeable battery to market maturity.

Iron–air batteries, originally proposed in the 1970s, have theoretical energy densities of more than 1,200 Wh/kg; by comparison, present-day lithium-ion batteries come in at about 600 Wh/kg, and even less (350 Wh/kg) if the weight of the cell casing is taken into account.

When it comes to volumetric energy density, iron–air batteries could perform even better with 9,700 Wh/l—almost five times higher than today’s lithium-ion batteries (2,000 Wh/l). Although lithium–air batteries, which are technically considerably more difficult and complicated to realize, can have gravimetric energy densities of up to 11,400 Wh/kg, even these advanced cells theoretically have “only” 6,000 Wh/l. Iron–air batteries are thus particularly interesting for a multitude of mobile applications in which space requirements play a large role. In addition, their main constituent—iron—is an abundant and therefore cheap material.

However, due to technological challenges such as catalyst corrosion, self-discharge and hydrogen evolution during battery charging, research into metal–air batteries was abandoned in the 1980s for a long time. The past few years, however, have seen a rapid increase in research interest.

Iron–air batteries draw their energy from a reaction of iron with oxygen. In this process, the iron oxidizes almost exactly as it would during the rusting process. The oxygen required for the reaction can be drawn from the surrounding air so that it does not need to be stored in the battery. These material savings are the reason for the high energy densities achieved by metal–air batteries.

Different from lithium-ion technology, the electrochemistry of iron is confined to surface reactions which result in the formation of a redox-layer on the iron electrode surface in alkaline electrolyte. The redox-layer on iron is mostly referred to as the passivating layer or passive film since the redox-reaction products accumulate on the electrode and eventually prevent further electrochemical reactions of the metallic iron surface beneath. However, the material constituting the redox-layer is not inactive and affects the redox-behavior of the electrode. The effects of the redox-layer on the electrochemistry of iron are, first, the contribution of secondary electrochemical reactions and, second, the moderation of the available electrode surface area.

Due to its tremendous technological importance regarding the protection against corrosion, the passivation of iron has been a subject to numerous physical and chemical studies. As a result of these studies, different models for the structure and the composition of the redox-layer have been proposed. However, although being interesting from a fundamental and an applied point of view, to date, only a few groups have investigated the evolution of the redox-layer in alkaline media and even less have reported in-situ microscopy studies in concentrated electrolytes due to the aggressive measurement conditions.

Accordingly, till present, research with respect to the redox-behavior of iron misses an in-depth understanding for the evolution of the redox-layer in concentrated alkaline electrolyte which is, in fact, deeply required for corrosion science and the improvement of iron-based batteries which would typically use 6-8M KOH. The topography and the growth mechanism of the redox-layer determine the available surface area and are jointly responsible for the corrosion behavior of iron as well as for the discharge capacity of iron-air batteries.

—Weinrich et al.

2017-11-03-iron-air-battery-01.png;jsessionid=9ED91D2ED76E6997E908DF32619B0E55
Energy densities of various metal–air battery systemsGravimetric and volumetric energy densities of various metal–air battery systems in comparison with Li-ion batteries and conventional gasoline. Copyright: Forschungszentrum Jülich / H. Weinrich Click to enlarge.

The insights obtained by the researchers create a new basis for improving the properties of the battery in a targeted manner.

2017-11-03-iron-air-battery-02.jpg;jsessionid=9ED91D2ED76E6997E908DF32619B0E55
Changes to the electrode surface over the course of four charging/discharging (redox) cycles. Copyright: Forschungszentrum Jülich / H. Weinrich Click to enlarge.

The deposits do not decrease the power of the battery. On the contrary, since the nanoporous layer increases the active surface area of the electrode, it contributes to a small increase in capacity after each charging and discharging cycle. Thanks to the investigations, the researchers have for the first time obtained a complete picture of this layer growth.

It was previously assumed that the deposition is reversed during charging. But this is obviously not the case.

— Dr. Hermann Tempel from Jülich’s Institute of Energy and Climate Research (IEK-9)

Furthermore, a direct link was verified for the first time between the layer formation at the electrode surface and the electrochemical reactions.

There is, however, still a long way to go until market maturity. Although isolated electrodes made of iron can be operated without major power losses for several thousand cycles in laboratory experiments, complete iron–air batteries, which use an air electrode as the opposite pole, have only lasted 20 to 30 cycles so far.

2017-11-03-iron-air-battery-03.png;jsessionid=9ED91D2ED76E6997E908DF32619B0E55
Schematic of the measuring method: the tip of the in situ electrochemical atomic force microscope scans the surface of the iron electrode. Laser-beam deflection reveals spatial irregularities, which can be compared to each other over the course of several cycles. Copyright: Forschungszentrum Jülich / H. Weinrich. Click to enlarge.

The results were obtained within the scope of a project on high-temperature and energy materials, which was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. It was made possible through a cooperation agreement between ORNL and Forschungszentrum Jülich. Both establishments have been collaborating closely on various scientific areas since 2008.

Resources

  • Henning Weinrich, Jérémy Come, Hermann Tempel, Hans Kungl, Rüdiger-A. Eichel, Nina Balke (2017) “Understanding the nanoscale redox-behavior of iron-anodes for rechargeable iron-air batteries” Nano Energy 41 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.023

Comments

And Bri

Admit after reading this article and many other similar articles, that batteries are no good and also very very costly. Is it clear now. as for climate change i told you to buy and maintain a small low cost gasoline-hydrogen mix car. Everybody is panicking and are buying big costly suvs or are panicking the other way and are buying costly evs and write in public blogs to change all the cars on the globe to slow charging heavy costly pure evs, LOL.

Lad

Interest that various materials are now being investigated for use in electric cells, i.e., silicon, sulfur, sodium, iron, etc.
And, batteries are finally being recognized as one of the important keys to our energy future. Now, if we could just get Trump and the Republicans to stop supporting fossil fuels for money, the country could move forward into the future.

HarveyD

Come on Lad, fossil and bio fuels were heavily supported under both Dem/Rep administrations for soooo many decades. Politicians from both parties are easy buys and are on sale every two years.

Texas style heavy (cars, SUVs and Pick-Ups) fuel guzzlers still outsell smaller more efficient vehicles in USA and Western Canada. Electrified vehicles (with the exception of Toyota's HEVs) make up less than 1% of the world fleet.

Buyers have the key, they alone can change the fleet composition and stop buying larger units than they really need.

Of course, more taxes on liquid fuels and on gas guzzlers would help but both Dem/Rep have and will not do it for well known reasons. A few more major hurricanes/floods and much higher property insurances will also help with a few buyers.

Paroway

If EVs are 1% of the world fleet, I want to be part of the 1%

Engineer-Poet

Note that "And Bri" is the latest instance of gor.  All the psychopatholgy is the same.

CheeseEater88

I was wondering if he was kin to gor. I was thinking that, then i read your comment.

I also would like to keep the two party politics out of here.

I don't think we need taxes on liquid fuels, we just need to launch better alternatives. Sure electrics are great, but they aren't as practical as people on here would like to claim, not yet at least. Soon as the model three, and subsequent competitors get a footing, things will start changing. It's not wise to force things on a population. People in capitalists societies vote with thier wallets, they don't like it when you take that power away, with sugary drinks, or with liquid petroleum products.

China, doesn't have that problem, they can quickly and quite decisively say, all cars must be electric by 2030, arbitrarily if they wanted to.

It would be interesting to see this battery come about, i do think lithium has stolen the spot light for far too long, i believe it's fairly mature, the technology and the processes we have currently, yet the cost just doesn't plummet like we were told to expect.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)