Pakistan Plans More Nuclear Plants
GM Bails on Rail

More Details on GM’s Sequel H2 Vehicle

Sequel

GM’s newly announced hydrogen fuel cell concept vehicle, the Sequel (earlier post), is big.

Slightly larger in its dimensions than the Cadillac SRX crossover or Chrysler’s 300C, the Sequel weighs much more than either: 4,774 pounds compared to 4,164 for an SRX or 3,758 for the 300C.

Yet GM engineers have designed a new fuel cell power system that moves the Sequel along from 0–60 mph in less than 10 seconds and supports a 300-mile range.

GM’s goal is to design and validate a fuel cell propulsion system by 2010 that is competitive with current internal combustion systems on durability and performance, and that ultimately can be built at scale affordably.

We’ve achieved remarkable gains in range and acceleration by using our fuel cell system technology that exists today. That’s a real breakthrough. For anyone tracking the viability of fuel cell vehicles, this is encouraging news.

Today, with Sequel, the vision is real—not yet affordable, but doable.

—Larry Burns, GM vice president of research and development and planning

Sequel_skateboard

The Sequel combines a new fuel cell system, higher-pressure hydrogen storage, enhanced by-wire controls substituting for mechanical systems and new rear-wheel hub motors to deliver the large-vehicle-equivalent performance GM is seeking.

The GM-designed fuel cell delivers 25% more power than its predecessor in the Hy-Wire. The fuel cell power module consists of the fuel cell stack, the hydrogen and air processing subsystems, the cooling system and the high-voltage distribution system. This power module delivers 73 kW of high-voltage power for the electric traction motors, as well as auxiliaries like HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning), the by-wire electronics and the battery.

The new fuel cell also uses a new air intake system that is more efficient, quieter and lighter than its predecessor. Additional radiators are located under the Sequel’s hood, directly behind the headlights, and in the rear of the vehicle, behind the taillights. These necessary design features help pull heat away from the fuel cell system, allowing Sequel to operate in hotter ambient temperatures.

A fuel cell system is more efficient than an internal combustion engine, but its energy conversion is totally different and requires much more heat to be removed via the coolant. With its three openings in the front, the extra opening for the HVAC and the two additional openings in the rear, you can easily recognize that Sequel was designed for heat rejection. We expect excellent performance at high ambient temperatures, typical of what you would experience in the desert.

—Lothar Matejcek, project manager, GM Fuel Cell Activities, Mainz-Kastel

The Sequel uses three traction motors—a single transverse-mounted motor in the front and two rear wheel hub motors—that deliver a total of 110 kW of power.

The front traction system incorporates a 60 kW electric motor from Siemens that delivers 1,740 lb-ft (2,350 Nm) torque at the wheels. The system incorporates the requisite power electronics and planetary gear.

The rear traction system includes the twin 25 kW rear wheel hub motors (designed by GM), and power inverters. Each wheel hub motor delivers 369 lb-ft (500 Nm) of torque, giving the Sequel total torque at wheels of 2,506 lb-ft (3,398 Nm).

A 65 kW Li-Ion battery system from Saft provides extra power to the three electric motors during acceleration. It also stores power regenerated during braking to help extend the vehicle’s overall mileage range.

Advances in high-pressure hydrogen storage, developed by GM in conjunction with Quantum Technologies, support Sequel’s 300-mile range. Three lightweight, carbon composite tanks store hydrogen at 10,000 psi (700 bars), compared to 5,000 psi (350 bars) in Hy-wire, Sequel's concept predecessor. Sequel can carry 8 kg of hydrogen, more than double that of GM’s HydroGen3 fuel cell vehicle. The larger tanks also enable a better ratio of stored hydrogen mass versus fuel storage system mass.

Comments

Chuck

Too bad GM is backing away from their original plan of having x number of hydrogen powered cars on the road by 2010. Now they are talking about "design and validate".

This announcement from GM is a nice smokescreen directing attention away from more feasible already available options like deisel, hybrids, increasing CAFE numbers.

G Strand

If we all stop buying gasoline powered cars may be
GM and Ford will get the message that we want H2.

The government should start a Manhatten type project
to convert the transportation system to H2. Oil
prices will drop, the airline industry could recover,
and the balance of payment problem would get better, along with the air. This is a win win situation for
America, if we only had the leadership to push it.

Then again we could all stop buying gasoline powered
autos, once they can't sell that iron the message would
be clear. How many oil wars are there going to be to
keep us in our cars.

Thomas R. King Jr.

I am excited about the Sequel and the infrastructure plans that GM and Shell have in store for the coming years. I want to be apart of this global shift to alternative energy and supporting hydrogen as the answer. The most important piece to the future success of hydrogen is government leaders in the United States Senate and House. It is crucial that they write bills to support hydrogen and speed in which an automobile can reach the consumers. Also the appropriations committee needs to allocate more money to the Department of Energy to help fund engineers to develop better ways to store hydrogen and make it more affordable for the future consumer. These are just a couple of problems that may stall the future of hydrogen becoming a reality. I want this shift to be as soon as possible for the sake of the environment, and our economy because of its dependence on foreign oil. The war of energy has begun and I am ecstatic to see it be played out in my life time.

Thomas R. King Jr.

I WILL BE INVOLVED IN HYDROGEN'S FUTURE!

Peter Peterson

I am in favour of hydrogen so long as the technology is applied to fuel-cell and electric motor propulsion. Using straight hydrogen in an internal combustion engine, I am NOT in favour with! We MUST evolve from the interal combustion engine and use magnetic energy (i.e. electric motor) as the basic unit of propulsion. Presently, so far, I am pleased to see the fuel-cell technology move in this (electric motor) direction.

The comments to this entry are closed.