ZAP’s New Flex-Fuel Minicars
31 October 2005
|The Obvio! 828|
ZAP has broadened its future minicar offerings by becoming the exclusive North American distribution for a pair of new flex-fuel minicars to be produced by Obvio! in Brazil. The two companies expect to unveil prototypes of the two in the US by the end of 2005. Initial plans are to roll out the vehicles in 2007.
Unlike its approach with the Americanized Smart Car, where ZAP takes the responsibility for converting imported smarts to meet US requirements, ZAP, which has taken a 20% stake in the company, will work closely with Obvio to ensure the vehicles are fully compliant when they leave the plant.
|The Obvio! 012|
Under the terms of the agreement, ZAP is ordering 50,000 vehicles from the Brazilian company during the three year period following initial delivery.
Both models, the 828 and the 012, may be small, but they feature an engine more than twice as large as that in the smart car: a 1.6-liter Tritec engine mated with a ZF Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT).
Tritec started out in 1997 as a joint venture, based in Brazil, between Chrysler and the Rover Group (then a subsidiary of BMW) to design a new small straight-4 engine for small cars. When BMW sold Rover Group, BMW retained the stake in Tritec.
Chrysler designed the Tritec engine, which is related to the 2.0-liter Chrysler Neon engine. The Tritec comes in three versions: 1.4-liter, 1.6-liter and supercharged 1.6-liter, and has been used in models of the Mini, the Neon and the PT Cruiser. (BMW will replace the Tritec in the Mini with an engine it is developing with PSA Peugeot Citroën.)
Both Obvio! models offer a “low consumption” model with an 85 kW (114 hp) entry-level version of the Tritec with combined estimated fuel consumption (using gasoline) of 33 mpg US (29.4 mpg city; 40.69 mpg highway). Obvio says it will also offer 170- and 250-hp versions.
|1The EPA disagrees with ZAP’s 60 mpg figure. (Earlier post.)|
|Engine displacement (cc)||1,598||698|
|Power kW (hp)||85 (114)||45 (60)|
|Combined fuel economy (mpg US)||33||601|
The result is a car more along the lines of a zippy Mini, rather than a fuel-sipping smart. (The 2006 Mini Cooper for the US delivers 31 mpg combined.)
The major difference, though, is the flex-fuel (gasoline or ethanol blend) capability of the Brazilian cars.
The Obvio 012 is a very striking vehicle for styling. Gas mileage is nothing to write home about but with Ethanol perhaps a marginally better eco-choice.
Posted by: Lance Funston | 31 October 2005 at 04:24 PM
It reminds me of a squashed AMC Gremlin.
Posted by: Schwa | 31 October 2005 at 04:55 PM
What are we looking at in terms of price? I'm trying to figure out why somebody would buy one of these instead of a Ford Focus or some other fairly cheap 30+ MPG vehicle...
Posted by: stomv | 31 October 2005 at 05:03 PM
More BS from ZAP. Whatever...
Posted by: chuckie | 31 October 2005 at 05:57 PM
The Obvio 012 has a pretty cool design, reminds me of Lexus concept from "Minority Report".
But the 828 is almost the ugliest car on earth. Who should buy this thing?
Anyway, MPG is unacceptable.
Posted by: evilkraut | 01 November 2005 at 07:32 AM
Why does a car this size need a 1.6L engine?
If it gets 33mpg with gasoline, just imagine how bad the mileage is running on E85.
Posted by: Biob | 01 November 2005 at 09:45 AM
There are far better small cars in Europe, and I thought the ugliest was the Renault Twingo. The Twingo looks good compared to the 828 and apparently gets better mpg and of course its probably cheaper.
I applaud zap in TRYING but their gas cars seem irelivent. Why get a small overpriced smart that only gets a few more mpg then the Prius? I like the smart but its just to expensive at $20k+ when brought in through an importer like zap.
Posted by: little shop | 01 November 2005 at 05:53 PM
Good grief! is that thing safe to drive on standard roads? looks like it would crumple like an aluminum can if it hit a speedbump too hard!
Posted by: Faction | 03 November 2005 at 08:34 PM
Hehe,. The obvio 828 is not ugly. Click on the link to see a bigger picture. Reminds me of a micro machine (the Hotwheels toy).
If I was made of money I'd buy it and put an RX8 rotary engine in it (because it might fit). But since I'm poor I'll agree with Little Shop and Chuckie's comments.
Posted by: Adrian | 12 November 2005 at 03:04 AM
Uh, hello....it runs on F'ing ethanol or gas. Can a Ford Focus do that? Then shut it.
Viva le Brazil!
Posted by: Obvio | 13 November 2005 at 12:37 PM
It remind me of the Smart. When the french company got into a technical bankruptcy for not paying the engines supplier (Italian), they raised the price and start exporting it to Canada with a limitation on availability in order to keep the price up. Nice deal n'est-ce pas? I suspect a similar fate for those cars.
Posted by: Giles Dufour | 18 November 2005 at 08:18 AM
The U.S. grows more corn than anywhere else in the world. Corn produces the greatest alcohol (ethanol) content percentage of any biomass used to make fuel, cosiderably higher than sugar cane which is used to fuel flex cars in Brazil (cars burning either a blend of gas and alcohol or just plain alcohol) and is extremely popular in that country. Ethanol is cheep to produce in the midwest and we have an over abundance of corn which is usually distilled into corn syrup and then used as a crappy sweetner in all the foods we love to hate. Talk about a goddamn conspiricy. Alcohol based fuels are so much better for the environment. What gives? Are we that stupid that we let the government get away with this obvious manipulation of an unused natural resourse that is cost effective and homegrown?
Posted by: Rip Goelet | 18 November 2005 at 08:29 AM
Ethanol from Corn is a poor choice. Just think of it as being a temporary patch due to political reasons. There are better ways. Here's a note I received from an expert:
Ethanol (aka grain alcohol) is made from corn starch currently. That's the stuff inside the kernel. Production has soared in recent years thanks to
high oil prices, low corn prices, and generous state and federal policies that encourage its production. Congress just passed a law requiring 5 billion gallons of production by 2010, up from about 2.5 billion now.
My foundation is launching an effort to promote making ethanol from cellulose rather than starch. To do this requires using enzymes to convert the sugars present in cellulose into the type of sugar present in starch.
There is one plant in commercial operation doing this presently, a company called Iogen (majority owned by Shell) in Canada. Iogen is considering opening a second plant in Idaho using wheat straw. We hope that advances in biotech will drive down the cost of the enzymes and make this process more competitive.
Why do we hope that? Because the world supply of cellulose is enormous compared to the world supply of corn starch. Cellulose is found in grasses like switchgrass, in woods like poplar and willow, in garbage, and in agricultural wastes like corn stalks. All of these are available at extremely low cost and in large quantities. Some take much less energy to
grow and process than corn starch, so yield much more energy. Because of this, they also reduce global warming emissions more effectively than cornstarch ethanol.
Estimates of maximum US ethanol production from corn starch go up to about 10 billion gallons, or about 8% of US motor fuel demand. After this it starts to compete with corn's primary use, being fed to cows. This would drive up prices for meat, milk, and cheese, not to mention the other outputs like corn sweeteners.
Corn requires substantial energy and chemical inputs, and has serious effects on wildlife habitat, soil erosion, and water quality. Switchgrass (and other prairie grasses) are the opposite on every count: low energy and chemical inputs, they ARE wildlife habitat, they BUILD soil, and they IMPROVE water quality.
If ethanol from cellulose were cost competitive it could produce up to 20-30% of current motor fuel demand. Combined with more efficient vehicles
it could take a serious bite out of US oil consumption, oil imports, pollution, and global warming emissions.
So, you cannot produce ethanol from switchgrass in your garage unless you are a biochemist. You could use corn starch I guess: this is called "a still." Moonshiners used them to make whiskey from cornstarch. Or you
could buy whiskey at the store and put that in your tank.
And yes, farmers could use biofuels to run their tractors which would reduce fossil fuel inputs to corn farming. And trains and trucks could run on
biodiesel to reduce fossil fuel inputs to shipping corn. And processors could replace natural gas and electricity with bioenergy inputs. But first we need to produce lots of biofuels.
And presumably the many new ethanol plants being built now are meeting stringent state and federal environmental rules. Like the one near Gowrie, Iowa.
To learn more, NRDC has a nice report on cellulosic ethanol on their web site, www.nrdc.org
Posted by: Rick | 23 November 2005 at 04:35 PM
Check out their website at
I drive a Scion xB...so I obviously like ugly cars. But check out all the features of the 828 for a projected price of $14,000! It's crazy. Mid engine. Rear wheel drive. Carputer. iMobile. Scissor doors. CVT transmission. 170 HP in a 1300 pound vehicle? That's awesome.
Posted by: Mike | 14 December 2005 at 12:57 PM
Here in Indonesia there is a lot of research going into the possible use of palm oil as a form of automotive and industrial fuel....a renewable green resource. They expect to have the details worked out by early 2008. The company doing this research is Musim Mas, the largest producer of palm oil in the country. They are active ecologists, who recognise the complications of balancing the fine line between business exploitation and smart business.
Posted by: Jeannie | 23 March 2006 at 09:20 PM
Either way, ethanol is the way to go until we get a hydrogen infastructure and hydrogen cars on the road that are affordable and profittable ... The middle east hit us where it hurts , well now it's time to hit them back where it hurts , Becoming independent of imported oil .. If Brazil can do it , the US can too w/ technology and innovation added w/ hybrid technology . We need to get out of 20th century ignorance and move into the the 21st century and start looking at what we have to gain from this adventure . And hopefully the oil cartels will keep the nose out of the way this.
Posted by: Darth Kleber | 08 May 2006 at 01:25 PM
As a native Texan, I know far to well about the correlation between Texas & Oil. But an old rancher once told me, there was the "Land" before they discovered oil & the land would still be there when the oil was gone. I, for one am sick of Big Oil & their bought & paid for politicians. It's obvoius they've sold us down the proverbial river to line their pockets at our expense. Using & improving upon Brazils technology in producing Ethanol, we would be able to free ourselves from terrorist oil suppliers, & bring this country back to energy independance. Now is the time for a new American Revolution, not volience, but new political parties with people elected to office vowing to observe a strict ethical code of honor, including dismantelment of Congressional perks, such as health care & retirement. This way something might be done about health care & Social Security. I'm sure the politicians think this is sedition, considering how many of them leave Washington as rich men & women at the tax payers expense. However, the facts are that oil is too valueable to waste as auto fuel. We will still need petroleum based lubricants, and the demand for plastics will continue to expand. However, plastics & carbon fiber plastics can be completely recycled. I wonder how long the American Automotive Industry will be the lackies of Big Oil, given the number of times they've the Oil Industry has kicked them in the face. Just look at the market share the U.S. Auto Manufactures have lost since the 1st oil crises in the 1970's. Then even after the U.S. Auto Industry has been abused, they've deep sixed inovative inventions & power sources that would free this country of having to purchase oil for fuel from countries that want to destroy us. It makes me question their patriotism and how much are they are paid by the Global Oil Empire to keep quiet. The idea of golbal economics, give the state mankind is in now, is foolish. In order for America to remain strong, we must not bee put in a position of feeding the "Oil Terrorist" in the Middle East. It is time for all of Americans to rise up & let our voices ring to the rafters. Our freedom is being usurped. It is time for a new American Revolution, and with God's will, a peacefule revolution to change this government & it's bought & paid for political parties.
Posted by: Kirven Larkins | 08 May 2006 at 09:14 PM
I see I am a little late to be adding to this conversation but I tell you what I like the specs on this wee beastie. Got a nice potent engine and well while Ethanol may not be an answer it may not hurt. Brazil apparently uses a lot of it compared to us. I bet with a few changes like color scheme and some other exterior doo dads it could get to be reasonably decent appearance wise. Anyone who reads this article should go to the companies web site to see some better angles for this car.
This model of mini car looks good compared to a host of other uglies some manufacturers are producing, phew!
Posted by: Alan K | 31 August 2006 at 07:34 AM
Great site and pretty colors!
Red rock resort Treasure island resort wisconsin dells Mandalay bay resort Palm springs resorts Gulf highlands beach resort Big sky resort Gaylord opryland resort Colorado resorts Dicks last resort Mexico resorts Mexico resort mexico villa rental state of new mexico Wilderness resort in wisconsin dells Deerhurst luxury resort Key west resorts Turtle island resort All inclusive resorts cancun Fairfieldresorts.com Canyons ski resort Family vacation resort Last resort - papa roach Hidden beach resort All inclusive family resorts Princeville resort Sedona resorts Alaska fishing resort Poconos resorts Oscoda resorts Hawaii resorts Disney resort Indiana golf resort
Posted by: Resort e | 27 June 2007 at 05:19 PM
Hello. I love your!
Chutney music Karate teen music What is music therapy Sheet music for taps Crazy frog music videos Winmx free music downloads eminem Saint germain music Mario brothers music Myspace music song codes Free downlaod music Harry potter theme music Myspace flash music player Windup music box movements Fifty cent music Music video source Instrumental music free downloads Trance music downloads Free music notation software piano Download final fantasy music First quality music supplies Music video blogs Myspace profile music videos Behind the music vh1 Dramatic orchestra music The sound of music do re mi Cash money music Reggae music videos Free downloadable christian music Free music codes for myspace Myspace music url code
Posted by: Music i | 27 June 2007 at 08:20 PM
IF... the debate was about ethanol, cellulose is the ONLY option... get rid of waste and provide over 50% of US consumption of fuel/ new markets for our farmers without raising food prices.
BUT...this is just another diversion (not as hoaxy as hydrogen). If you read a little farther, the real hope is that the 828E and the 012E will arive in the States, and popularity and mass production will bring the price down a little farther...over 200miles a charge, over 100 miles an hour. gas motors canNOT match the power specs of electric motors.
Don't give me the polluting power plant arguement. If you consider the pollution and mess made drilling. The pollution made refining, The pollution made transporting- you reallize the snow-job. This doesn't even consider where we would be if you applied the new solar technology that absorbs 4x the energy, and if we started to focus our intelligences on real solutions instead of ways to perpetuate pocketbooks.
Posted by: Troy Thomas | 07 August 2007 at 08:21 AM
hey does the obvio.012 run on battery too if soo that car is complete
Posted by: | 05 October 2007 at 10:08 AM
and one more thing do you ever stop to think not only of the human's but of the environment too i think thet if you think of the environment it will be a reward of it's own (paper,home's ,clothes) basically every thing we own has a part of the environment in it
Posted by: | 05 October 2007 at 10:11 AM
Hey guys did you know that the currently hottest reggae singer Ava leigh who’s worked with the famous sly n Robbie ,Nick Mannesah ,and future cut has free music
You can download from her website which is avaleigh.co.uk come on and check it out.
Posted by: avaleigh | 21 November 2007 at 08:17 AM
Hey guess what? the hottest reggae singer Ava leigh who’s worked with the famous Sly n Robbie, Nick Manasseh, and future cut has free music you can download at www.avaleigh.co.uk ?check it out.
Posted by: avaleigh | 11 January 2008 at 05:40 AM