DaimlerChrysler to Launch New Sprinter in March 2006; Platform for Plug-in Hybrid and Fuel Cell Work
22 November 2005
The plug-in hybrid (PHEV) Sprinter, based on the current model. |
DaimlerChrysler will launch a new version of its Sprinter commercial van in March 2006. Not only has the Sprinter sold some 1.3 million units in its 10-year existence, but it is the platform for testing and evaluation of a commercial plug-in hybrid drivetrain as well as hydrogen fuel-cell systems.
The new Sprinter will offer a greater range of body and engine variants than its predecessor: four body lengths, three roof heights and a range of diesel engines including a new V6 diesel. A new V6 gasoline engine will be an option as well. Gross Vehicle Weights will range from 3.0 to 5.0 tons, reflecting the different applications.
The four and six-cylinder CDI diesel engines offer outputs ranging from 65 kW (88 hp) to 135 kW (184 hp), and are all fitted with a particulate filter and meet Euro 4 specifications.
DaimlerChrysler displayed the current version of its plug-in parallel hybrid Sprinter at the International Commercial Vehicle Show in Amsterdam in October.
This is the model currently undergoing customer trials in the US.
The plug-in parallel hybrid Sprinter combines an 80 kW (109 hp) diesel delivering 270 Nm of torque with a 70 kW electric motor delivering 275 Nm of torque. The motor is integrated between the automatic transmission and the clutch.
A nickel/metal-hydride battery with a capacity of 14 kWh provides power (a lithium/ion battery will be used in future) and is recharged via regenerative braking. Grid-charging the battery takes around six hours at full discharge. The battery can support the Sprinter with a range of up to 30 km (18.6 miles) and a maximum speed of 120 km/h (74.6 mph) in all-electric mode.
The electric motor can function as a generator with an output of up to 40 kW for operating tools or equipment when on call in the field. The additional electrical equipment fitted in the Hybrid Sprinter weighs around 350 kg. If lithium/ion batteries are installed, the extra weight is reduced to just 160 kg.
DaimlerChrysler estimates a 10% to 20% reduction in diesel consumption, depending on the type of application.
Whether or not DaimlerChrysler implements the plug-in hybrid powertrain in the new Sprinter depends on the results of the on-going field testing, according to the company.
I'm happy to see a major auto manufacturer developinq a plug-in hybrid. The plug-ins especially make sense for short-haul delivery trucks with lots of stop & go. For this kind of driving I think a "series" hybrid makes even more sense than a "parallel" version. The "series" could utilize a smaller diesel engine running at optimal speeds to charge the batteries and/or power a larger electric motor. The diesel would stay off unless the batteries where nearly discharged or there was a call for more power than the batteries could deliver.
Posted by: James White | 22 November 2005 at 10:25 PM
There is a problem with series hybrids. Turning a gas motor then making electricity then turning it back into motion with an electric motor is less efficicent then doing it with a gas motor in the first place. Series/Parallel like the Prius is the best for many uses. The Prius system is often looked at as a 'small car' solution but the power split device in the Prius as well as all of the rest of the systems could easily be scaled way up.
A series hybrid problem is mostly the batteries. You loose more then 30% when you put the power into the batteries and take it out again. Supercaps solve this problem (and the battery wear problem) but you loose the juice when it sits too long.
Posted by: little shop | 22 November 2005 at 10:41 PM
I'm glad that at least one automaker has finally seen the light. My only vehicle is a van which i use for work. The 18 mile all electric range would suffice for 90% of may travel. I'd also be able to charge at work. Whats really special is the 75mph electric top speed, way better than the prius. I estimate this van would save me £1000 per year in gas, I wonder what the sticker price difference will be.
Posted by: Nick Flynn | 23 November 2005 at 04:17 AM
It's probably too early to accurately speculate on price since this is still only in evaluation mode, plus the cost uncertainties we all know about with lithium ion batteries in the near future, etc. But it does seem to me that this could potentially do a lot better than 10 to 20% improvement in fuel economy, just as in Nick's post. I see these kinds of vans used frequently for shuttles between a hotel and airport, for example. Plugging the van in during the time periods it was waiting to make the next run might extend the battery's range to cover most of the day, particularly where the hotel was within a few miles of the airport. In any case, a major manufacturer testing these systems is a great development. The wheels are rolling on this technology.
Posted by: Shirley E | 23 November 2005 at 05:59 AM
With a nice size roof like that why not fit it with solar panels to extend the range! Cover them with a plexiglass and you could still put things on the roof if you had to.
Posted by: Abraham | 23 November 2005 at 07:03 AM
I agree, why hasn't anyone started offering solar panels as options to any electric vehicles? With most trips under the full range of the batteries, solar panels could provide most of, if not all, of the energy to recharge them, and they would be charging during the day, all day. Another thing that has been very disturbing is that why don't the manufactureres offer electric versions of the same cars that they currently produce? Most electric cars, look like toys. If you don't mind driving a toy, that's great, but some of need our vehicles for carying things (like groceries). Come'on motor manufacturers, give us real options!
Posted by: Richard Farci (FL) | 23 November 2005 at 08:30 AM
Here's my idea. Put a plug in the front and the back of the vehicle. Use a standard power cord that computer power supplies and monitors use.
This way, if the vehicle was accidentally driven off with it still plugged in, the cord would more easily slide out.
Posted by: Smith | 23 November 2005 at 09:17 AM
There will probably be an interlock system that will prevent driving away while plugged in.
Posted by: tom deplume | 23 November 2005 at 12:45 PM
The charger takes more than 2 kW max; you're not going to handle this over a standard computer line cord at 110 V.
Using a twist-lock connector with a solenoid-operated unlock/eject mechanism would be perfect; put the vehicle in drive, and it pops itself loose from the cord. Add a cord reel and it would be close to perfect.
Posted by: Engineer-Poet | 23 November 2005 at 07:53 PM
Unfortunatly solar panels on the roof of a car provide very little power. A typical electric or hybrid car can go 2-4 miles on 1kwa of energy. So if you put a 1000w aray on top of the a car it would cost $8000 or so and give you 2-4 miles of range more each hour it was in full sun. So yes it could add 20 miles of travel a day but there is no escaping the $8000 cost. If you drove very little and had a large battery it would work well but otherwise its quite expensive.
Secondly you could not fit a 1000w array on top of most cars, though you could fit it on the sprinter pictured above.
Two factors also working against you, the weight of the array added to the car and that the array is not properly positioned so a 1000w array would almost never produce 1000w.
Posted by: little shop | 23 November 2005 at 08:21 PM
Any thoughts on sprinter for low emmissions? considering replacing my obnoxious ford cargo van with lower emmision vehicle but dont know if I can wait until technology catches up and offers hydrogen or other good energy choices.
Posted by: jr | 18 August 2006 at 07:39 PM