Researchers Developing Better Models of Combustion Chemistry; Could Lead to Cleaner, More Efficient Engines
BMW to Display Liquid Hydrogen Storage System and Bi-fuel Engine at NHA 2006

Honda: “Striving to be a Company that People Want to Exist”

Defining Sustainability: Part Five of Eight

By Jack Rosebro

Honda’s simplified rendition of its life cycle assessment (LCA) system, dividing corporate activity into domains and identifying the environmental impact of each, as well as policies designed to reduce or remove such impacts.

Perhaps no automaker is more closely associated with environmental performance than Honda Motor Company. Honda has a long track record of building vehicles that produce exhaust emissions that are far below allowable limits. Its CVCC engine, popular in the 1970s, was the first internal-combustion engine that could meet Clean Air Act requirements solely through engine performance, rather than exhaust after-treatment.

And twenty years ago, when California was still one of the few parts of the world with a vehicle emissions inspection system, even high-mileage older Hondas in that state—some of which were so clean that they did not require catalytic converters—were statistically some of the cleanest cars on the road, often besting later-model vehicles built to more stringent requirements.

Honda has also often enjoyed holding the prize for US-market car with the highest EPA fuel economy rating. For example, their 1991 CRX HF—a quasi-predecessor to the company’s first hybrid, the Insight coupe—was rated at 49/52 miles per gallon by the EPA.

But times change, and although today’s Insight is indeed thrifty at EPA’s rating of 61/68 miles per gallon, Honda also produces the Ridgeline, a 4,500-pound truck that is EPA-rated at 16 miles per gallon in the city, 21 on the highway—a dubious milestone in Honda’s environmental history.

Still, Honda’s overall portfolio of environmental research and development is impressive, and the company is not known as a follower: in 2004, Honda CEO Takeo Fukui emphasized, “The words of our founder, ‘Do not imitate others,’ are burned in the minds of everyone at Honda.

Honda’s R & D department is legendary in the automotive world, and the engineers in that department have been quite busy in recent years. Some of Honda’s most recent initiatives include:

  • Hydrogen and polyfuel solutions. Honda is aggressively pursuing hydrogen fuel cell commercialization, including its Home Energy Station (HES) cogeneration concept (earlier post) that would use natural gas to supply a home with heating and electrical power, as well as hydrogen for home refueling of a fuel-cell vehicle, while producing less greenhouse gases than conventional energy systems. Honda commercialized a simpler home cogeneration unit, which can power dwellings but does not produce hydrogen, in 2003. Honda also recently announced its next-generation hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle, currently called the FCX Concept (earlier post).

  • Solar energy. Honda plans to enter the solar energy market in 2007, producing its own CIGS (copper/indium/gallium/selenium) photovoltaic cells for use in homes—and, intriguingly, vehicles (earlier post).

  • Jrhondarice
    Results of Honda’s rice work.
  • Genetic research. A collaborative program between Honda and Nagoya University has led to the isolation of a gene which accelerates the rate of growth of Koshihikari, the most popular variety of rice in Japan.

  • Aviation. The HondaJet prototype business jet reportedly gets 40% better fuel economy than comparable aircraft—a promising achievement, given that few solutions are available to lower the massive greenhouse-gas production inherent in commercial air travel.

  • Robotics development. One of Honda’s next-generation ASIMO robots, designed to “help people and live with people,” starts work as a receptionist next month at a Honda office north of Tokyo. ASIMO can run at about 4 miles per hour.

But when it comes to the challenge of sustainability—tying environmental and social initiatives together to form an integrated business model that allows a corporation to flourish without degrading the world around it—Honda is silent.

The HondaJet.

Indeed, the word “sustainability” is completely absent from Honda’s corporate 2005 Environmental Report, which covers activities in Japan during the 2004 fiscal year. “Sustainable” is used only twice, and only then in passing. Even Honda’s North American environmental report does not mention the word.

This is not to say that Honda does not recognize the gravity of the environmental problems that its products have helped to create—in fact, there are signs that Honda is willing to be more frank about the subject than most of its competitors.

In a marked departure from the positive spin so often present in automakers’ environmental reports, Honda’s CEO Takeo Fukui tackles the problem head-on, flatly stating the challenge: “We aim to become a company that people all over the world want to exist.”

Honda’s Environmental Statement adopted by the company in 1992, states:

As a responsible member of society whose task lies in the preservation of the global environment, the company will make every effort to contribute to human health and the preservation of the global environment in each phase of its corporate activity. Only then will we be able to count on a successful future—not only for our company, but for the entire world.

The statement is supplemented by four guiding principles, covering recycling, waste disposal, individual responsibility, and influence of the corporation on its local environment and society. Assessment of the environmental burden that Honda places upon the world is divided into domains such as development, production, purchasing, and sales.

Information is given on environmental targets set by Honda, and it is notable that the reduction or elimination targets for “substances of concern”—natural toxins such as lead, mercury, and chromium—are pursued more aggressively in Honda’s facilities in Japan than in their facilities outside Japan.

The Wako building and the CO2 benefit.

As Ford has done with its revitalized Rouge River complex (earlier post), Honda has taken to constructing new facilities with an eye on environmentalism. Its Wako Building, completed in late 2004, was designed to reduce total life cycle CO2 emissions during all phases from construction to operation.

Natural light and Honda’s proprietary solar panels help to reduce energy-related CO2 output by more than half compared to a comparable yet conventional building, according to Honda. The building’s roof is partially landscaped to offset CO2 production and collect rainwater, minimizing runoff.

Recycling is, not surprisingly, a large part of Honda’s environmental efforts, given that the Japanese government enacted the End-Of-Life (EOL) Recycling Law in January 2005 for automobiles. Despite referring to its recycling efforts as “cradle-to-cradle”, these efforts are more in line with conventional recycling philosophy.

The fate of old filters.

“Cradle-to-cradle” generally refers to a nature-inspired product design in which materials never become waste, but are nutrients that can remain in the biological cycle by either feeding healthy soil or returning to the manufacturing processes instead of moving downstream.

Honda now collects automobile components from its dealerships in Japan, and reuses some of those components in replacement parts. Although more than 80% of the average car sold in Japan is reclaimed or recycled, the remainder is pulverized into automobile shredder residue (ASR).

As landfills in Japan are rapidly filling up, government regulations required the reduction of previous ASR levels by 30% as of 2005, with further reductions of 50% by 2010 and 70% mandated by 2015. Honda also recovers refrigerant CFCs and airbag inflators from vehicles it accepts for recycling.

As is so often the case, Honda’s report does not suffer from a lack of data. But data is data; data with context is information. As with the sustainability reports that have been examined in previous weeks, this reporter finds the information in Honda’s 2005 environmental report to be, more often than not, lacking that context.

For example, Honda reports that about 400,000 kilograms (around 440 tons) of xylene were released into the atmosphere from Honda’s Hamamatsu, Suzuka, and Kumamoto factories during the fiscal year 2005. However, the report does not explain how and why xylene is harmful (it is a powerful aromatic solvent that can affect the brain and mucous membranes, but is broken down into less harmful chemicals by sunlight or soil), does not compare xylene discharge for fiscal 2004 to previous years, does not describe whether or not such emissions led to unhealthy air surrounding the factories, nor does it explain what methodology was used to arrive at such figures.

The absence of such data, tedious though it may be to present, makes it impossible for the reader to decide whether or not Honda is moving forward or backward with respect to its handling of xylene at those factories.

A random data point, therefore, highlights a key drawback of this and indeed all of the sustainability reports examined thus far in our series: If a company does not employ and display a transparent methodology for measuring, comparing, and presenting data, how can potential consumers and investors compare that company’s information with the information presented in successive or previous environmental reports?

And finally, if Honda is to remain a company that people want to exist, how long can it do so without a specific mandate to work toward a sustainable existence?

Next week - Defining Sustainability, Part 6: Hyundai and the Hydrogen Economy




Been on an interstate lately, like I-70 in Colorado? The issue of sustainability goes way beyond the frame of the cars themselves. We have an entire world that is unsustainable because of the ripple effects of the automobile. Nothing will change this until we find a way to largely to do without them. At least Honda is not engaging in the silliness of Ford by pretending that they are striving for some reasonable notion of sustainability. Sustainability would include a campaign on their part to do away with their product.

By all means, let's build the cleanest cars possible, but let's never think that that cars will be part of the solution.


Personal transportation is part of freedom, being able to travel at will. Litter and massive roads, which we need to minimize, are the down side of the freedom. So please Car makers, give me your Hybrids and your EVs. Enjoy life now with no guilt, because within a few million years natural will have its way, anyway.


I'm very disappointed with Honda. I do not recommend purchasing their hybrids. The Toyota Prius and Ford Escape Hybrids are technologically far more advanced, and unlike the Honda and GM's psuedo-hybrids, they can evolve into Plug-in Hybrids.

The Plug-in hybrid incorporates a larger battery pack (100-300 lbs), which create a long list of advantages that hydrogen fuel cell technology cannot match.

They're a homepower system invaluable in an emergency, that naturally leads to public power. The batteries lower vehicular center-of-gravity for improved stability and reduce the potential for accidental rollover, perfect for top-heavy SUVs. Plug-in Hybrids are applicable to all weight classes, from compact to full-size to freight truck; not so with hycrogen fuel cell. Hybrids can utilize any practical fuel and perfect its combustion through the strictest regulation of engine speed and load.

The Plug-in Hybrid's most important advantage: a car that runs only a limited distance on batteries creates an economic incentive to drive shorter distances, leading motorists to patronize and build local economies. In time, more destinations become accessible without having to drive! Get it? Walking, bicycling and mass transit finally become viable means of travel, enabling enormous investment in infrastructure - sidewalks and streetscapes, plazas and bike pathways, electric rail transit will take back the asphalt streets!

Sorry, but Honda hybrids and fuel cell developments are bogus. Plug-in Hybrid is the future of vehicular techonolgy!


Several of Honda's most lucrative markets are just environment-degrading toys -- off-road motorcycles and ATVs especially, but also street motorcycles bought for recreational cruising, the entire Acura division, boat motors, etc etc. For every forward step Honda makes with Civics, they take another step back with their other products.

As for the comment that "Personal transportation is part of freedom..." -- what does that have to do with cars? Does that mean that I'm not free if I don't have a jet plane? Ride a bicycle to learn what freedom really is!

Joseph Willemssen

"Enjoy life now with no guilt, because within a few million years natural will have its way, anyway."

Great approach! Since everything will ultimately come to an end, do nothing to make life better while you're here. Brilliant! Nihilism rules!


I'm 74. My 100 mile a day bicycle rides are over.

We can argue all we want but the automobile will still be with us for as far in the future as we can see. What we need is a way to minimize their effect on our environment.

Joseph Willemssen

"We can argue all we want but the automobile will still be with us for as far in the future as we can see."

You're 74? Then perhaps you should go read some books that came out a few decades before you were born. At the turn of the century there were many books that predicted what would happen in the next 100 years. I've looked at a lot of them. And you know what their "vision" of the future was? Bigger trains. Faster trains. Trains that went more places.

No mention of cars.

Time passes and technology changes. One hundred years from now, the technology we know as automobiles will be niche, at best - much like trains are today.


What are you talking about, tonychilling? The Honda system is less complicated than the Toyota system; does that make it less sophisticated? It delivers comparable fuel economy, and does better on the highway. And the new Civic has an EV mode. Perhaps you misunderstand how their system works...What do you think specifically prevents the Honda system from evolving into a plug-in hybrid?


I agree that cars mean personal freedom and we should be entitled to have them, even in a future with global warming and oil scarcity. We just need alternatives/incentives to drive less. Even when the problems of fossil fuel combustion have been solved, the problem of coping with hundreds of thousands of people driving one person per car into metropolitan centres will still haunt us. But then again, who knows, maybe we'll be cluttering the skies instead...

In the mean time, anyone/company that strives to minimise the side effects of our way of life should be applauded. Go Honda!



Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

Ich habe ein HONDA CR-V Fahrzeug gekauft.

VIN SHSRE57508U024418
Baujahr 2008 Hergestellt in Großbritannien
Motor № 2024341

Meine Entscheidung, ein Fahrzeug Ihrer Gesellschaft zu kaufen, beruhte auf der weltweit bekannten Qualität der HONDA Motoren. Meine Tätigkeit ist mit vielen Reisen verbunden – ich bin Anwalt. Es verging kaum ein Monat nach dem Kauf, als Probleme bei meinem Fahrzeug auftauchten. Mein Auto verbraucht eine große Menge Öl, etwa 2 Liter auf 800 km, was die, in der Gebrauchsanleitung aufgeführten Höchstwerte, bei Weitem überschreitet.
Nach einer Untersuchung meines Fahrzeugs wurde festgestellt, dass der Verbrauch auf einen Fehler des Herstellers in Großbritannien zurückzuführen ist und Öl in den dritten Zylinder eindringt. Des Weiteren wird auch meine Autobatterie nicht aufgeladen. Mein Auto steht unter Garantie, allerdings weigert man sich sowohl die benötigten Ersatzteile als auch das Fahrzeug auszutauschen. Die Leitung der offiziellen Vertretung von HONDA in Russland erklärte, dass der besagte Fehler ein Massenfehler sei und die Wartezeit für die benötigten Ersatzteile mehrere Monate betrage. Auf Grund dieses technischen Mangels kann ich mein Fahrzeug, das ich bei Ihrer Gesellschaft erworben habe, nicht verwenden, was einen finanziellen Verlust für mich zur Folge hat, da man sich weigert mir ein Fahrzeug für die Dauer der Reparatur zu stellen, um meiner Arbeit nachgehen zu können – der Tätigkeit als Anwalt. Die Reparaturdauer meines neuen Fahrzeugs ist mir nicht bekannt.
Zusätzlich erleide ich einen moralischen Schaden, da ich der Bank den Kredit zur Anschaffung eines Fahrzeugs bezahle, dieses jedoch nicht benutzten kann.
Es gibt sehr viele Käufer mit ähnlichen Problemen, einem technischen Mangel am dritten Zylinder, und alle bekunden Unzufriedenheit gegenüber der HONDA Gesellschaft.
Wenn das gegebene Problem mit unseren Fahrzeugen nicht binnen kürzester Zeit gelöst wird, sind wir gezwungen die HONDA Gesellschaft bezüglich der technischen Mängel in unseren Fahrzeugen bei Gericht anzuzeigen, da die Leitung von HONDA sich über die vorhandenen Mängel der Fahrzeuge im Klaren war und den Vertrieb von offenkundig mangelhaften Fahrzeugen betrieb. Wir werden auch die finanziellen Verluste ausweisen, die durch den Erhalt von mangelhaften Fahrzeugen entstanden sind. Im Falle einer Absage, sehen wir uns gezwungen in den Massenmedien Russlands und einer Reihe von europäischen Zeitungen Warnungen, die Kunden vom Kauf bestimmter Modelle des Herstellers Honda abraten sollen, sowie Daten aus offiziellen Quellen bezüglich des Produktionsfehlers der Fahrzeuge, die in Großbritannien hergestellt wurden, zu veröffentlichen.


The comments to this entry are closed.