GM Introduces New Engines for 2007 Astra; More Power, Less Fuel
17 November 2006
2007 Vauxhall Astra. |
GM is introducing a set of new engines for the 2007 Astra (Opel/Vauxhall): two gasoline engines that offer improvements in fuel economy and CO2 emissions as well as increased performance and two versions of a 1.7-liter diesel engine.
The Astra line-up now offers a total of 11 different engine choices ranging from 90 to 240 hp.
A 177 hp (132 kW) 1.6-liter gasoline turbo engine replaces the older 168 hp (125 kW) 2.0-liter unit. With 230 Nm (170 lb-ft) of torque, the 1.6-liter model accelerates from 0-60 mph in 7.8 seconds (5-dr hatch) and has a top speed of 137 mph, making it quicker than the outgoing 2.0-liter model.
The 1.6-liter car is also both more economical and cleaner than the model it replaces. It posts a combined fuel economy figure of 7.7 liters/100 km (31 mpg US)—a 16% improvement over its predecessor. As a result, CO2 emissions drop from 216 g/km to 185 g/km.
The current 1.6 TWINPORT gasoline engine is also being replaced by a revised unit, with power increased from 105 hp (77 kW) to 115 hp (85 kW). Continuous variable control of both camshafts is the main reason for the performance benefits. With this “Cam-Phase”system, valve timing can be varied depending on the speed and load range of the four-valve unit for optimal performance or consumption. The new engine offers fuel consumption of 6.3 l/100km (37 mpg US) on the combined cycle—a 4% improvement over the older model—with a decrease in CO2 emissions from 166 g/km to 158 g/km.
The new 1.7 CDTI engines with 110 hp/81 kW and 125 hp/92 kW both come with six-speed manual transmission and feature common-rail injection, four-valve technology with swirl control and a maintenance-free particulate filter. Available from spring 2007, they will replace the 1.9 CDTI units with 100 hp/74 kW and 120 hp/88 kW.
Average fuel consumption for the outgoing 1.9-liter engines is 5.8 l/100km (41 mpg US); fuel consumption data for the new 1.7-liter diesels will be available in the spring of 2007.
I think they are replacing the current Saturn Ion with the Astra. A 4 gas (1, 1.4, 1.8, 2.25L)+ 3 diesel (1.2, 1.6, 2.0L) engine setup, w/BAS options on all, would be suitable for US market.
Posted by: allen_Z | 17 November 2006 at 02:39 PM
When will GM be bringing their 1.9L CDTI engines to the US?
Posted by: Icelander | 17 November 2006 at 03:53 PM
It even looks nice. Will *any* of options make it into N.A.?
Posted by: John W. | 17 November 2006 at 05:08 PM
Engines certified for the European market must be adapted and re-certified before they can be sold in the US. In particular, CA emissions standard are significantly stricter, especially for diesel. Afaik, GM has not announced any plans to bring small-displacement diesel engines to market in the US, presumably because of the high cost of Tier 2 Bin 5 NOx aftertreatment systems.
There has, however, been a substantial shift in attitude in GM product management. Instead of designing a "world engine" in the US and expecting the rest of the world to jump for joy, there is now a global powertrain division with 85,000 employees.
Even so, customer expectations don't change overnight. Germans put up with the higher noise and vibrations levels of inline fours because their annual vehicle license fee is based on engine displacement to depress the market for gas guzzlers (Germany has no domestic oil fields). Fuel economy and CO2 emissions are also high priorities for consumers. By contrast, American consumers expect to pay much less for their cars, their license fees are based on residual value and their fuel is dirt-cheap compared to Europe. Therefore, an engine option that is popular in one geography may not be in the other.
GM's previously rather weak Pontiac and Saturn brands are currently leveraging Opel platforms as a shortcut to revamping their model line-up. Regular car development had become something of an ugly stepchild in the US organization, which had focussed on higher-margin trucks and SUVs and got caught flat-footed when gas prices almost doubled. Unfortunately, GM is still saddled with inflexible truck production lines in the US and its beancounters are loath to write them off prematurely. Expect GM to proceed with some caution.
The US operations of Ford and Chrysler are in a similar position, albeit weaker. Mercedes has not announced any plans to bring its A- and B-class models to North America. Ford may yet end up talking to Renault-Nissan, in which case you could see some French flair in a future line-up.
Posted by: Rafael Seidl | 17 November 2006 at 06:35 PM
125hp out of a 1.7L turbodiesel....thats what my obselete 03 2.2L was puttin out 4 years ago. Whats next? 150hp out of 1.3L twinturbos? Diesels in F1?
GM get this stuff over here!
Posted by: fred | 17 November 2006 at 06:49 PM
The Astra (imported from Europe) for México is available with 2 engine options: a 1.8 L, 125 HP normally aspirated and a 2.0 L, 200 HP Turbo.
Previously GM México was selling here a different Astra imported from Brazil, but GM México received many complains from customers because of the poor quality assembly of the brazilian models.
Posted by: Jorge | 17 November 2006 at 07:00 PM
Fred -
the VW Golf RS32 features a 1.4L gasoline engine with a turbo PLUS detachable supercharger. It#s rated at 125kW (200hp). GM has the engineering capability to deliver something similar, but evidently they feel the cost/benefit ratio does not meet their corporate philosophy.
Audi won Le Mans this year with the R10 12-cylinder diesel engine rated at 650hp/1100Nm. A toned-down variant derated to a mere 500hp/1000Nm is expected for their Q7 SUV in Europe in 2008.
Posted by: Rafael Seidl | 17 November 2006 at 07:50 PM
Rafael:
Yearly license fee in US/Canada is about 50 bucks a year and is calculated as expenses of motor vehicle officials to maintain vehicle registration (differs from state to state). Residual value of vehicle is detrimental for comprehensive vehicle insurance, no more. Cars and trucks are considered to be a necessity for normal existence, not a luxury. For example, most states have provision to allow for severe drinking-driving offenders to have limited ability to drive to/from working place to earn a living.
Up level Opel Astra is well-respected performance car all around the world, notably in Australia. It is inherently safer (as being front-wheel drive), more agile, and fun to drive vehicle than 1.5 ton RWD (with traction control!) begemots fed to American market mainly by DC and BMW. And all the fun for half the price and half the fuel consumption.
I believe that GM made a strategic mistake for not introducing such car – already developed and accepted worldwide – to US market. Yes, it would not be a universal fit, but the same could be said about small GM econoboxes as current Chevy Aveo, widely sold in US/Ca. All in all, it is quarter billion vehicles market, and even a small niche could account for couple of millions of Astra’s.
Posted by: Andrey | 18 November 2006 at 02:03 AM
The change realy is the gm has dumped america and is now ekyed far more on china and other mar valuable markets.
Thus they make things for thier importsnt markets and then if it cant be adjusted cheaply enough for america they dont realy give a crap.
Posted by: wintermane | 18 November 2006 at 04:05 AM
Supposedly, Ford saved billions developing a bunch of their cars, crossovers, and car based SUVs on the CD3 and upcoming CD3-2 platform.
Posted by: allen_Z | 18 November 2006 at 05:47 AM
Rafael,
MB does sell its A- and B-class models in North America. Both are sold in Mexico, and the B-class is sold in Canada. As far as I can tell, the B-class is not doing well in Canada. There are two obvious reasons for this: it is an ugly car, and it is priced uncompetitively (even when compared to a C-class). Add to this the fact that it is not a fun car to drive, and the B-class does not make any sense as an emotional purchase or as a rational purchase.
Posted by: Bernard | 18 November 2006 at 07:31 AM
GM has been importing questionalble quality small cars to regain local market share. It did not work. They can't compete with Honda and Toyota (and many others) in that market sector.
Saturn has never realy taken off. Very few people will buy a second one. Improving its persistently pale image with Astra platforms and engines may and may not work. People associate Saturn with poor quality, especially the engines. Why not sell the Astra under its own name and do away with Saturn, if it doesn't sell. GM has too many cars for their diminishing market share.
Moving a major part of their production activities to China (and other low labour cost countries) and closing most USA plants may be a way to survive (if it is not already too late). The status quo would take them into receivership within 2 or 3 years.
Posted by: Harvey D. | 18 November 2006 at 09:24 AM
Harvey D. -
the Astra is a model, not a brand (Opel and Vauxhall are, but both are unknown in the US). GM is in a bind with its proliferation of brands and associated dealerships in the US - laws in many state require franchisees to be compensated. Shutting down Oldsmobile cost GM a pretty penny. Presumably, they feel the Pontiac and Saturn labels are worth revamping.
Moving production to China (and importing the finished vehicles from there) is not as straightforward as it sounds. First, the Big Three all have huge legacy obligations to their unionized workforce and retirees. Second, politicians in Michigan and elsewhere would quickly pass laws to stop or at least slow down such a move, because of the huge number of families whose livelihood still depends either directly or indirectly on automotive manufacturing.
Personally, I feel GM will be stuck in purgatory for a few more years and lose some more market share before stabilizing and competing effectively against the Japanese. GM has a solid R&D division, their problem is that the beancounters are in charge. Hence, their cars have lacked emotional appeal.
Ford and Chrysler are arguably in even more precarious positions. Bill Ford has already handed over the reins to Alan Mulally. Perhaps Dieter Zetsche will invite Wolfgang Bernhard back to Chrysler, this time as CEO, now that VW has picked Audi chief Martin Winterkorn to succeed recently ousted Bernd Pischetsrieder. Tom LaSorda obviously bet the farm on oil prices dropping fast and is now stuck with a mountain of unsold truck and SUV inventory.
Posted by: Rafael Seidl | 18 November 2006 at 10:14 AM
Rafael:
I agree with you on most of what you said with one exception. Competition will come from China and India, not so much from Japan, except for the short term (10 or 15 years)
Historically China and India had the largest population and the largest share of the world Gross Product (WGP).
Two thousand years ago and up to around 1500, those 2 countries had 60% of the world gross product (WGP).
By 1870, with 48% of the world population their economic share had droped to about 30% of the gross world product (WGP)(British Empire etc)
By 2005 they had droped to 6.8% (market price) or about 23% (adjusted for buying power) (American Empire etc)
With yearly economic growth rates between 8% and 10%, China and India will regain their rightful economic place by 2050 or before.
By 2025 they may produce the majority of the vehicle batteries, PHEVs and BEVs. Their economy may represent as much as 35% of the world's total.
China + India markets may surpass Europe + USA markets sometime between 2025 and 2050.
For GM to move the major part of their porduction activities to China and/or India may not be such a bad idea, especially if the major market growth is there.
Posted by: Harvey D. | 19 November 2006 at 09:33 AM
Speaking of diesels, India, and hybrids, the Indian auto/equipment maker Mahindra & Mahindra is going to try its hand in the US auto market. The company is predominately concentrating on SUVs and light trucks, with diesel engines. They have a 2+ton diesel electric hybrid SUV, 30-35mpg, that is supposed to go into production in the next two years. They will attempt to sell it to the US market as well.
Google News- Mahindra & Mahindra US
Posted by: allen_Z | 19 November 2006 at 02:41 PM
"When will GM be bringing their 1.9L CDTI engines to the US?"
When monkeys fly out of my butt.
"the VW Golf RS32 features a 1.4L gasoline engine"
NO. R32 has a 3.2 VR6. You are thinking of the Golf GT.
Posted by: freeze | 19 November 2006 at 07:29 PM
Andrey, license fees in the US (i.e. registration in my state) vary a lot from state to state. Here in Michigan it varies greatly be vehicle weight, not value. I think $50/year will register a motorcycle here. Light cars seem to be around $100/year and trucks more like $200/year. And I don't think we have the highest fees around.
Anyone - I think it's high time that the major auto-using economies developed some common emissions and safety standards so that the same vehicles can be sold in Europe, North America and Japan without expensive testing and reengineering for each market.
Posted by: zach | 20 November 2006 at 09:11 AM
Vauxhall/Opel/Holden Astra is sold here ... as a Chevrolet Cobalt / Pontiac Pursuit. It's the same thing underneath.
Posted by: Brian | 20 November 2006 at 09:34 AM
"Vauxhall/Opel/Holden Astra is sold here ... as a Chevrolet Cobalt / Pontiac Pursuit. It's the same thing underneath."
They are completely different cars. They only share the basic platform architecture. The honda civic and element are the same car because they share the same platform. Its simply not true.
Posted by: freeze | 20 November 2006 at 11:34 AM
As freeze pointed out the R32 has a 3.2 V6. The GT has the 1.4 twin charged 4cyl with 170hp (not 200).
Posted by: James | 20 November 2006 at 02:03 PM
Personally, I don't think GM is aiming for pie in the sky in North America. They don't need to. They are already now one of the leading foreign car sellers in China. In fact, Toyota has barely scratched the surface in there. What's more is that GM seems to be experimenting with more technology there. They are already making plans to launch numerous hybrid vehicles in the Chinese market and have signifigant R and D labs in that country.They are in a market position in China that puts them in a positive cash flow situation.Since China has the potential of providing 10 times the sales that NA could provide, it is in my opinion rather wise of them to pend success by developing their portfolio in China early.
GM is essentially relying on China to prop up their sales, which in turn will help their NA operations. It worked for Ford in the 80's when sales of their European version of the Escort kept them in decent enough shape to develop the Taurus.
GM is one of the few companies that has made a admirable effort into developing legitimate hydrogen vehicles. While many have raised eyebrows over their program, I applaud it and hope they suceed. China will help.
Posted by: William | 21 November 2006 at 09:50 AM