Intensified Global Ag Research Effort to Blunt Impact of Global Warming
05 December 2006
The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)—the world’s largest alliance of international agricultural research centers—in consultation with the global environmental change science community, is embarking on a new effort to intensify and streamline research to reduce developing countries’ vulnerability to climate change caused by global warming.
The climate change research agenda is already generating climate-resilient innovations, including crops bred to withstand heat, salt, submergence or waterlogging, and drought, and more efficient farming techniques to help poor farmers better use increasingly scarce water and fragile soil. Researchers are also focusing on boosting agriculture’s role in reducing greenhouse gases.
Wheat is of particular interest. A new study from one of the participating research centers—Can Wheat Beat the Heat?—forecasts a 51% decrease by 2050 in the amount of India’s most favorable wheat-growing land. According to the study, sustained periods of hotter, drier weather will dramatically shrink India’s breadbasket and diminish yields, placing at least 200 million people at greater risk of hunger.
As a result of rising temperatures, the climatic conditions best suited to wheat growing will shift away from the tropics—where most of the world’s poorest countries are situated—toward the poles and to higher elevations.
According to the study, North American wheat growers will be able to farm new lands as far as 65 degrees north, 10 degrees beyond their current planting limit. In North America, wheat growing would extend from its current limit—extending from Ketchikan, Alaska in the West to Cape Harrison, Labrador in the East—to less than two degrees beneath the Arctic Circle. In Eurasia, much of Siberia would become farmland. While poor tropical countries’ capacity for food production will diminish, developed countries—most of which are located far from the equator—will, in many cases, experience an increase in productive capacity as land that was previously frost-bound opens to cultivation.
Meanwhile, a second study finds that projected increases in temperature and changes in rainfall patterns will decrease growing periods by more than 20% in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa. According to the findings in CGIAR’s research report Mapping Climate Vulnerability and Poverty in Africa, Africans living in the continent’s poorest countries are at greatest risk from environments that will become even less hospitable to agriculture. Most vulnerable of all are farming families in East and Central Africa, including Rwanda, Burundi, Eritrea, and Ethiopia as well as Chad and Niger.
The authors’ findings were based on analysis that examined such factors as land degradation, renewable water supply, infant mortality, crop suitability, disease prevalence, governance, and public health.
Main approaches in the new climate change agenda outlined by the research centers include the following:
Developing climate-ready crops. Researchers are developing more reliable varieties of food crops capable of withstanding increased temperatures, drought, and flooding. Heat-resistant cereals currently under development will provide greater yield reliability, especially in the tropics and subtropics, where many crops are grown at or near their thermal optimum, and where a 1 degree Celsius increase in temperatures during the growing season can result in a decline in yields of up to 10 percent. Under these conditions, photosynthesis slows or even ceases altogether, pollination is prevented, and dehydration sets in.
With increased rainfall and flooding forecast in many parts of Asia, new breeds of rice benefiting from a trait that allows the plant to survive prolonged periods of submergence are already helping farmers on millions of hectares in India and Bangladesh. Researchers are also looking to boost rice yields from a shrinking land base by reconfiguring the plant’s photosynthetic engine so that it more efficiently converts solar power and atmospheric carbon into grain.
For drought-prone regions like Southern Africa, researchers using an innovative molecular approach to breeding have made progress in developing maize that withstands prolonged dry periods and infertile soils. This and other drought-related work, including research that allows crops to be programed so they mature at the time of year when conditions are most likely to be favorable for grain development, regardless of when they are planted, is beginning to have an impact in farmers’ fields.
Plant breeders will continue to develop new varieties that can better tolerate the impacts of climate change, but there are limits to the ability of new varieties to counteract the effects of heat, drought, and submergence.
Adaptation does not guarantee that farming will be able to continue in an area, or if it does, that farmer income will remain unchanged. Some adaptation will involve shifting production from one location to another.
—Dr. Robert S. Zeigler, Director General of the International Rice Research InstituteMore efficient use of resources. Improving farmers’ ability to use water more efficiently and to better manage their fragile soil is essential if they are to adapt to the shocks of climate change. In many farming systems, as much as 70% of the rain falling on a crop is lost to evaporation and runoff and cannot be used by the plants.
Several CGIAR-supported centers are refining and introducing new and better methods for rainwater harvesting and storage, shifting to less thirsty crops and perfecting drip irrigation to deliver precise amounts of water when and where it is most needed. Conservation farming techniques refined by CGIAR researchers, such as low- or zero-tilling in which farmers refrain from plowing their fields, help to increase the water-holding capacity of soils and infiltration so more water is available for the crop, moderate soil temperatures, and have the added benefit of preventing carbon from escaping from the soil into the atmosphere.
Managing greenhouse gases. The CGIAR-supported centers are working with farmers to develop and test innovative practices capable of contributing to the net reduction of atmospheric carbon on three fronts: stanching the loss of carbon from agricultural systems; returning carbon from the atmosphere to plants and soils; and better managing forests and soils.
Trees are at the center of one of the most important research efforts. CGIAR scientists are working to increase poor farmers’ participation in carbon sequestration projects by introducing satellite technologies that verify the carbon they are removing from the atmosphere, thus allowing them to receive proper compensation. According to estimates from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, agroforestry has the potential to trap an additional 170 megatons of carbon each year.
Agricultural systems also release greenhouse gases—accounting for an estimated 20% of man-made emissions—by clearing trees for fields and pastures, transforming soil into cultivated land, and burning crop residues.
To reduce the incidence of devastating slash-and-burn agriculture in the humid tropics, scientists from a number of the international centers are working with farmers to develop alternative livelihoods from the very forests they once cleared. In Mexico, CGIAR scientists have introduced infrared sensors to farmers to help them reduce the application of nitrogen fertilizer, which, when applied to crops, produces emissions of nitrous oxide. Another group of CGIAR researchers in Colombia has isolated a naturally occurring chemical in African grass that inhibits the production of nitrous oxide.
Better forecasts, policy options. To help farmers make better planting decisions, a consortium of CGIAR-supported centers is working with national and international meteorological services and leading climate-modeling researchers to provide local and regional information that combines forecasting knowledge with expertise in farming systems. In the local, national, and international policy arenas, CGIAR researchers are generating innovative options to foster adaptation to climate change. In addition, new research at CGIAR-supported centers focuses on understanding the impacts of climate on natural resources, such as water, fisheries, and forests, and on planning for improved management of these resources to meet the needs of growing populations as the climate changes.
Resources:
Hey! Not to worry, MM, we can have our SUVs and Sugar Ka-Booms.
Posted by: jcwinnie | 05 December 2006 at 07:19 AM
Another report predicts that the hard wheat and corn production belt will move north of the USA border (as far north as the Hudson Bay) by the end of the current century.
Modified engineered switchgrass may replace today's wheat and corn farms to produce enough ethanol and biofuel for our SUVs. Residues may be used to feed livestocks and humans.
Of course, chefs will have to be retrained to come up with new appetizing non-fat dishes from residuums.
Obesity, diabetes and air pollution may be solved by climate change.
Posted by: Harvey D. | 05 December 2006 at 08:36 AM
All the climate change in the world won't transform northern Canadian muskeg into farmland.
Posted by: Neil | 05 December 2006 at 09:04 AM
The good news is that methane levels have stabilized.
Posted by: Cervus | 05 December 2006 at 09:27 AM
Reading between the lines, is CGIAR condoning more genetically modified food?
Posted by: fyi CO2 | 05 December 2006 at 02:59 PM
There are current workarounds:
-Transplanting 2-3 week old seedlings of existing hardy, quick maturing varieties of crops will help by giving you added time. Take advantage of an earlier thaw too. That would take care of the cooler upper Midwest (Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, areas near the Great Lakes), and Canadian plains.
-For the other regions, more widespread winter crops would contribute. We currently plant winter wheat as a cover crop (erosion mitigation), and wheat flour for bread.
-Much of the wheat, soy and corn that we grow go into animal feed. Shift animals from current wheat and corn silage, to pasture crops (that also perform erosion control, nitro, and carbon fixing). That would cut the need for nitro, chemicals, and some labor/fuel as well. Natural/native plants (like switchgrass, clovers, and tobacco), when managed, can yield 5-40 dry tons/acre of rich feed (depending on climate, species, and management).
- An assortment of strains, from hotter parts of species’ range, would help with plant and animal breeding. Additionally, placing plants in hothouses, seeing if a few survive, and then selecting them for reproduction would be another way. Biotech (Gene Mod or no Gene Mod) will find a way to assist.
-Tobacco (grown for biomass/feed) would have to follow specific mowing schedule. Since one would want maximum leaf growth before nicotine (toxic) starts to take hold in leaves, the window is short, perhaps dicey. Not using Apatite (calcium phosphate) solves the Polonium issue. Apatite is useful if you require smoking grade tobacco (taste). This is not the case for feed grade. Thus, it is not necessary.
-The frost free zone in Florida, and Southwest would expand, include southern Texas, and provide greater opportunities to plant/transplant crops during autumn/winter, and harvest during spring/summer.
-Improving other countries' agricultural yields, utiization efficiency, water efficiency, and adding widespread double/triple cropping would ease many food and economic issues.
-Augment plant hardiness/resistance by physical implements, where possible. Shading with recycled white plastic sheets is one scheme. Using white/light colored (i.e. limestone) rock cover layer to prevent soil from reaching temperatures that kill/stunt the plant (offshoot of hot Desert farming...Israeli?), is another.
Posted by: allen_Z | 05 December 2006 at 04:11 PM