Maxwell Technologies to Design and Produce Ultracapacitors for Mercedes Hybrid Program
Renault 3.0L V6 dCi Concept Diesel to be the Basis for Nissan 2010 Tier 2 Bin 5 Maxima Diesel in US

IEA Calls for Greater Efforts on Energy Efficiency

Iea1
Car-kilometers per capita and personal consumption expenditures, 1990-2004. Click to enlarge.

Although improvements in energy efficiency have played a key role in limiting increases in energy use and CO2 emissions in IEA countries, the rate of these efficiency gains is currently only about half the rate seen in the 1970s and 1980s, according to a new publication by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Since 1990, the rate of energy efficiency improvement in IEA countries has been less than 1% per year.

The study, Energy Use in the New Millennium: Trends in IEA Countries, examines how changes in energy efficiency, as well as other factors such as economic structure, income, prices and fuel mix, have affected recent trends in energy use and CO2 emissions in IEA countries. Despite some positive developments, the new publication shows that IEA countries are not on a path to a sustainable energy future.

Iea2
Energy Savings from Improvements in Energy Efficiency since 1990, IEA14. Click to enlarge.

Energy efficiency savings since 1990 have resulted in CO2 emissions in the IEA being 14% (or 1.2 Gigatons of CO2) lower than they otherwise would have been, according to the study. (See chart at right.)

These savings are approximately equivalent to the annual final energy consumption and CO2 emissions of Japan and, by the end of the period analysed, resulted in annual fuel and electricity cost savings of at least US$ 170 billion.

The study notes that while new engine technologies and vehicle design have produced significant efficiency benefits in passenger cars, in many countries the benefits of introducing more efficient vehicles have been eroded by increased congestion, changes in driver behaviour and additional in-car amenities.

Electricity use in the household and service sectors is increasing much more rapidly than consumption of fuels, such as gas and oil, in these sectors. As a result, appliances and air conditioning are rapidly approaching space heating as the most significant source of CO2 emissions from households. On a more encouraging note, strong efficiency improvements are having a substantial impact in manufacturing. Energy use and CO2 emissions in this sector have remained almost unchanged since 1990, even though output has increased by nearly one-third.

The study calls for more timely and better information with which to judge the value of existing energy policies and to identify the stronger policies needed to meet the challenges identified by the G8 leaders.

Governments need to put substantially greater resources into developing and improving end-use data to enable effective monitoring of energy consumption and CO2 trends at deeper levels of detail.

We must find new ways to accelerate the decoupling of energy use and CO2 emissions from economic growth. The good news is that there is still substantial scope for cost-effective energy efficiency improvements in buildings, appliances, industry and transport. The bad news is we need to move much faster in realizing this potential. This will require strong and innovative action on the part of governments.

—Nobuo Tanaka, Executive Director of the IEA

Nobuo Tanaka began serving as the Executive Director of the IEA on 1 September, succeeding Claude Mandil. Mr. Tanaka, a Japanese citizen who most recently served as Director for Science, Technology and Industry at the Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), is the first non-European to head the IEA.

Resources:

Comments

Neil

Interesting chart! I would have thought for sure that Canadians would be driving as far as Americans. I've seen other charts that indicated that our energy use was on par or exceeding that of Americans. The difference must be space heating.

jack

Interesting chart! I would have thought for sure that Canadians would be driving as far as Americans. I've seen other charts that indicated that our energy use was on par or exceeding that of Americans. The difference must be space heating.

I don't think that US number is reliable. 25K km is 15.5K miles. The real number is about 1/2 of that -- around 8,100 miles per person. If once includes non-personal use of light vehicles, it's around 9,300 miles.

Brian

I think that number is spot on. I drove 25K miles last year.

jack

I think that number is spot on. I drove 25K miles last year.

Clearly your individual situation proves the average, even though the average is 15,500 miles, not 25,000.

Try harder, please.

Harvey D

Jack;

I agree with you, the 25 Km per Yr per Capita for USA seem to be very high and looks more like per car or light truck per year.

According to my insurance people, 15.5 Km per year for Canada may also correspond more to the per car usage than per capita.

Western Canadians use as many per capita gas guzzlers as Americans and drive a lot. Eastern Canadians drive smaller cars and smaller SUVs.

Canadians may drive less but use slightly more energy per capita than Americans mostly due to much colder climate and much longer per capital freight tonnes/miles.

Cheap gas seems to translate into more mileage per vehicle. Cheap energy translates into more energy used per home. Americans and Canadians used about twice as much energy per home than Europeans and the climate is not the major factor.

sjc

Jack,

Cut the arrogant comments like,

"Try harder, please."

You try to sound like some intellectual superior when we have no evidence that this is the case.

jack

Cut the arrogant comments like, "Try harder, please." You try to sound like some intellectual superior when we have no evidence that this is the case.

GFU

jack

I agree with you, the 25 Km per Yr per Capita for USA seem to be very high and looks more like per car or light truck per year.

Harvey, after looking into this a bit, I think the 25K km (15.5K miles) figure refers to the average vehicle-miles for a new light vehicle in the US.

The average for all household vehicles (as of 2001) was 11,100 miles and the per capita miles for all vehicles (including all forms of transport) was a shade over 10K miles in 2005.

The comments to this entry are closed.