Alberta Unveils New Royalty Plan for Energy Sector; 20% Increase Projected Over Current Levels
Flybrid Flywheel Hybrid System Passes First Crash Test; Developing for Road Cars as Well

Ontario Biomass Could Provide 1.6B Liters of Ethanol or 6.9 TWh of Electricity

Currently available agricultural residues could provide up to 1.6 billion litres (423 million gallons US) of ethanol for transportation fuel or 6.9 terrawatt hours of electricity in Ontario, according to a recent study examining the near-term potential of cellulosic biomass in the Canadian province.

Researchers at the University of Toronto used life cycle analyses to determine that co-firing available residues (an estimated 2.3 to 4.2 million tonnes annually) in existing coal-fired power plants could reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the province by 2.3 million tonnes. Alternatively, using the residues to produce ethanol/gasoline blends for transportation would reduce emissions by up to 2.5 million tonnes.

Using other sources of biomass, such as dedicated bioenergy crops, could provide additional emissions reductions; however, the near-term supply of such crops is uncertain and thus was not considered in the study.

At current oil prices, the most cost-effective option for reducing greenhouse gases is co-firing the residues, in large part because it would benefit from existing capital; in contrast, producing cellulosic ethanol would require a standalone facility.

Despite the difference in cost-effectiveness, the researchers say that producing ethanol is still an attractive end-use for the biomass for several reasons, including the need to meet the province’s 5% renewable fuel standard, the potential for improvements in cellulosic ethanol technology and economics, and the lack of other alternatives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation.

(A hat-tip to Bob!)

Resources

  • Y. Zhang, S. Habibi and H.L. MacLean. 2007. “Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada.&rduqo; Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 57:919–933.

Comments

Harvey D

(A) ...the lack of other alternatives for reducing GHG emissions from trnasportation.....

It seems that this research group may not have looked that much into other alternatives, such as:

1) Multiply the use of hybrids
2) Use more PHEVs
3) Use more BEVs
4) Use smaller more efficient vehicles.
5 Increase efficiency of current ICE vehicles (from 18 to 36+ mpg).
6) Use more public transport.
7) Electrify trains, subways, buses etc
8) Use electric 2 and 3 wheels bikes (19+ millions in China)
9) Etc.

(B) with the current consumption rate, the identified alternative fuel potential would be sufficient for about 500 000 vehicles or about 8% to 10% of Ontario's needs. Unless improved Hybrids, PHEVs and BEVs are massively introduced, the fuel shortage will still be very significant.

AES

Couple points:

1) Couldn't the rotting biomass be used as a fertilizer as well, thus controlling erosion, reducing pollution caused by runoff, GHG emitted by manure, etc?

2) Implementing the ethanol strategy would require not just a cellulosic ethanol plant, but a conversion of the vehicle fleet. Until flex-fuel (>E10 capable) vehicles become more common, the electrical route is probably more sound. So whoever is the steward of the biomass should divert the supply proportionate to each infrastructure's current capabilities.

3) Who is in charge of all this biomass anyway? Is it the product of different farms under different owners? Who will supervise its collection and distribution? Should the farmers form a coop to best manage their collective biomass?

This company..

www.greenenergyresources.com is attempting to create an inventory of wood waste for the US which is Kyoto Compliant. The inventory would be waste wood from storms etc and which is normally burned unproductively.

domenick

"Using other sources of biomass, such as dedicated bioenergy crops, could provide additional emissions reductions; however, the near-term supply of such crops is uncertain and thus was not considered in the study."
That's too bad. Hemp is grown in Ontario.

DS
1) Couldn't the rotting biomass be used as a fertilizer as well, thus controlling erosion, reducing pollution caused by runoff, GHG emitted by manure, etc?
rotting biomass emits methane which is 20 times more affective than CO2 for trapping heat!

The comments to this entry are closed.