New Nanostructured Thin Film Shows Promise for Efficient Solar Energy Conversion; Potential Application in Hydrogen Production and CO2 Conversion to Hydrocarbon Fuels
09 January 2008
A team of researchers from California, Mexico and China have combined two nanotech methods for engineering solar cell materials to create a material that performs better than expected.
Two methods for engineering solar cell materials that have shown particular promise are the use of thin films of metal oxide nanoparticles, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), doped with other elements, such as nitrogen; and the use of quantum dots that strongly absorb visible light. These tiny semiconductors inject electrons into a metal oxide film, or sensitize it, to increase solar energy conversion. Both doping and quantum dot sensitization extend the visible light absorption of the metal oxide materials.
Jin Zhang, professor of chemistry at the University of California, Santa Cruz and his team combined the two methods and created a TiO2thin film doped with nitrogen and sensitized with cadmium selenide (CdSe) quantum dots (QDs) via a linking molecule, thioglycolic acid (TGA). When tested, the new nanocomposite material performed better than predicted.
CdSe QDs linked to TiO2/N nanoparticles using TGA were found to significantly increase the photocurrent and power conversion of the films compared to standard TiO2/N films without QD sensitization. The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) is 6% at 400 nm for TiO2/N-TGA-CdSe solid-state solar cells and 95% for TiO2/N-TGA-CdSe films near 300 nm in a Na2S electrolyte, which is much higher than that of undoped TiO2 with QD sensitization or TiO2/N without QD sensitization. The power conversion efficiency (η) was found to be 0.84% with a fill factor (FF%) of 27.7% with 1100 nm thick TiO2/N-TGA-CdSe thin films. The results show that combining nitrogen doping with the QD sensitization of TiO2 thin films is an effective and promising way to enhance the photoresponse in the near-UV and visible region, which is important for potential photovoltaic (PV) and photoelectrochemical applications.
The group’s findings were reported in the Journal of Physical Chemistry C. Lead author of the paper was Tzarara Lopez-Luke, a graduate student visiting in Zheng’s lab who is now at the Instituto de Investigaciones Metalurgicas, UMSNH, Morelia, Mexico.
We have discovered a new strategy that could be very useful for enhancing the photo response and conversion efficiency of solar cells based on nanomaterials. We initially thought that the best we might do is get results as good as the sum of the two, and maybe if we didn’t make this right, we’d get something worse. But surprisingly, these materials were much better.
—Jin Zhang
Zhang’s team characterized the new nanocomposite material using a broad range of tools, including atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy, and photoelectrochemistry techniques.
The hybrid material offered a combination of advantages. Nitrogen doping allowed the material to absorb a broad range of light energy, including energy from the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum. The quantum dots also enhanced visible light absorption and boosted the photocurrent and power conversion of the material. The nanocomposite’s IPCe was as much as three times greater than the sum of the IPCEs for the two other materials, Zhang said.
We think what’s happening is that it’s easier for the charge to hop around in the material. That can only happen if you have both the quantum dot sensitizing and the nitrogen doping at the same time.
—Jin Zhang
The nanocomposite material could be used not only to enhance solar cells, but also to serve as part of other energy technologies. One of Zhang’s long-term goals is to marry a highly efficient solar cell with a state-of-the-art photoelectrochemical cell. Such a device could, in theory, use energy generated from sunlight to split water and produce hydrogen. The nanocomposite material could also potentially be useful in devices for converting carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels, such as methane.
Sources of funding for this research included the US Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation of China, and the University of California Institute for Mexico and the United States (UC-MEXUS).
Research collaborators included Abraham Wolcott, Li-ping Xu and Shaowei Chen at UCSC; Zhenhai Wen and Jinghong Li at Tsinghua University in Beijing, China; and Elder De La Rosa of the Centro de Investigaciones en Optica, A.C., in Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico.
Resources
Tzarara López-Luke, Abraham Wolcott, Li-ping Xu, Shaowei Chen, Zhenhai Wen, Jinghong Li, Elder De La Rosa, and Jin Z. Zhang, “Nitrogen-Doped and CdSe Quantum-Dot-Sensitized Nanocrystalline TiO2 Films for Solar Energy Conversion Applications” J. Phys. Chem. C, ASAP Article 10.1021/jp077345p S1932-7447(07)07345-1
IN ADVANCE I'M NOT AN EE, SO SOMEONE PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I SCREW UP.
"The power conversion efficiency (η) was found to be 0.84%"
If I read this right, such a solar cell would produce 8.4w/m^2 assuming isolation of 1kw/m^w. Doesn't seem so great to me, however...
"The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency(IPCE) is... 95% for TiO2/N-TGA-CdSe films near 300 nm in a Na2S electrolyte."
This indicates to me that such a cell produces at a very low voltage and that perhaps it has issues with internal resistance/charge transport. Such issues, I would guess, can be dealt with fairly easily.
With such a high IPCE, perhaps specially engineered cells (that address above mentioned voltage and power issues) could replace multi-junction cells at a lower cost and a higher efficiency.
Posted by: GreenPlease | 09 January 2008 at 07:01 AM
the real question is, when will it be commercialized. not to worry of course, fortunately so many organizations are throwing their weight and cash behind solar now that this will be inevitably picked up by someone sooner rather than later.
Posted by: kert | 09 January 2008 at 07:57 AM
Recently NanoSolar brought their thin film solar panels to mass production and started shipping product. The entire first year's production, about 2 megawatts, has been sold out to power companies in Europe. They claim that $1 per watt solar panels is their production goal and they will meet it when they are able to ram up additional production.
The short-comings of many solar cells, including the NanoSolar cells, is their efficiency; if you produce a more efficient cell, it follows you can produce more electricity in a given amount of space. And, all things being equal, you can produce more power in fewer cells, thus; increasing the total output measured in megawatts.
Hurry up and get these guys into production; the world is waiting!
Posted by: Lad | 09 January 2008 at 08:07 AM
This is more of a scientific contribution than a commercial product. They have shown that QD can enhance the output more than the theoretical model suggests. This can lead to more investigation and more experiments to explain why this is so. This is one way science can lead to breakthroughs that can lead to commercial products. There is a lot of future work on this yet to be done.
Posted by: sjc | 09 January 2008 at 08:20 AM
NanoSolar has already shipped their first order:
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2007/12/nanosolar-ships.html#more
Posted by: Curtis | 09 January 2008 at 08:32 AM
It seems that in the not too distant future, the world may get access to more and more affordable clean solar energy.
Progressive electrification of most transportation vehicles, HVAC units, most commercial and industrial processus is a way to reduce GHG by at least 50% or more. This will require more electrical energy and solar is one of the best sustainable source.
If we eventually manage to convert CO2 (from many sources) to a useful gas such as methane and sunlight to hydrogen it would be another plus for humanity.
We have to continue to finance R & D and supply (public + private) *start-up funds* for early commercialization (at home) to ensure sustainable on-going development.
Interesting times ahead if we make the right decisions before it is too late. We will probably do.
Posted by: Harvey D | 09 January 2008 at 10:21 AM
I am NOT a chemist but it appears that the linking molecule used here is C2H4O2S, which derives from a byproduct of biofuels (esp. biodiesel). It would be elegant to apply such a byproduct to making better PV panels. Is there a curious synergy at work here?
Posted by: gr | 09 January 2008 at 01:35 PM
@gr
There are a string of bio fuel and similar (waste) byproducts, now looking for a purpose and available in quantity that appear to be finding industrial application.
I'm thinking of everything from salt to sulpher, plastic bags to paper,
Sorry I'm not able to be more specific but regular readers of this site will know what these are.
The days of waste disposal issues being ignored are turning to commercial use and demand at quite a pace.
This suggests that recycling concepts and methodology have validated themselves with outcome based results.
Exhausting the knowall's and knockers (who are really saying its not viable as its too difficult) eventaully.
Anti pollution regulation will drive more entirely new industries and be GOOD for the economy.
Posted by: arnold | 09 January 2008 at 03:47 PM
This is very technical language. Are they saying they've produced a solar cell with 95% conversion efficiency?
Posted by: Robert Marston | 10 January 2008 at 06:47 PM
No, they quoted that only at near 300 nm.
"The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) is 6% at 400 nm for TiO2/N-TGA-CdSe solid-state solar cells and 95% for TiO2/N-TGA-CdSe films near 300 nm in a Na2S electrolyte..."
Solar cells tend to be good converters in a narrow band. Since the sun's energy is spread across the spectrum of light, they do not do as well for all the wavelengths. There are two and three junction cells that do better, but they cost more.
Posted by: sjc | 11 January 2008 at 05:46 PM
I totally agree! gr, remcowoudstra
Posted by: making biodiesel | 12 July 2008 at 12:19 PM