ZeroTruck Debuts at AFVI Expo
Toyota Launches Redesigned Alphard As Two Different Vehicle Series; Fuel Economy Gain Up To 20%

California ARB Revises Proposed Rule To Clean Up In-Use On-Road Diesel Trucks, Buses

The California Air Resources Board has revised a draft regulation that will require retrofits and engine replacements for the estimated privately owned 300,000 diesel trucks and buses on California roadways beginning in 2012. The proposed regulation now calls for truckers to retrofit pre-2007 model year trucks with soot filters and then requires a gradual modernization of trucks beginning in 2012, so that ultimately all trucks are the cleanest, 2010 or newer models.

Staff re-worked an earlier version of the draft regulation, presented in January, to eliminate the need for truckers to replace two trucks in a nine-year span, instead relying more heavily on retrofits for the first two years of the regulation. The revised proposal has a lower cost while preserving important public health benefits.

The regulation is projected to cost the trucking industry somewhere between $3.6 to $5.5 billion from 2010 to 2021. ARB is in the midst of allocating $1 billion in Proposition 1B funds, much of which will go toward helping truckers retrofit and replace trucks. Other entities, including the US EPA and several California ports are offering financial assistance.

ARB is hosting a set of public workshops to discuss the revised regulation later this month and in June—the fifth set of workshops since the initial regulatory concept was presented during public workshops in April 2007. At the workshops, staff plans to discuss:

  • Revisions to the proposed regulatory language presented in January 2008, and staff’s revised emission benefit and cost analyses. The proposed revisions include requirements for the installation of diesel particulate filters (DPFs) for some vehicles beginning in 2010 and 2011, and engine turnover requirements starting in 2012. The proposed revisions do not require more than a single engine/truck replacement.

  • Revisions to the Public Agency and Utility Regulation to include light heavy-duty diesel engines operated by municipalities and utilities in that regulation, and to clarify the best available control technology requirements.

  • Revisions to staff’s proposed concepts for efficiency improvements from tractors and trailers operating in the state. The proposed revisions include limiting the requirements to tractors/trailer combinations that are hauling 53 foot long box trailers.

Staff will also separately discuss in breakout sessions how school districts may be affected by the requirements in the proposed regulation for the installation of DPFs on public and private school buses.

The language of the proposed regulation will be available from the ARB On-Road Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles (In-Use) Regulation site.

This draft regulation addresses the largest unregulated source of diesel emissions in the state. Between 2010 and 2020, ARB estimates that the regulation will prevent 11,000 premature deaths associated with exposure to diesel exhaust, and save roughly $500 million in health care costs during that same period.

Emissions from diesel particulate matter are associated with causing a variety of health effects including premature death and a number of heart and lung diseases. A recent study looking at the health impacts to West Oakland, California residents posed by diesel emissions estimates the yearly non-cancer health impacts resulting from exposure to port-related diesel particulate matter emissions in the area: 18 premature deaths (age 30 and older), 290 asthma attacks, 2,600 days of work loss, and 15,000 minor restricted activity episodes. Most of the risk comes from diesel particulate matter emissions from trucks traveling on nearby freeways and marine vessel traffic in the San Francisco Bay Area unrelated to the Port of Oakland.

Later this year, ARB will also consider adopting another proposed regulation involving ocean-going vessel main engines to further reduce diesel soot. State control measures will contribute to an approximate decrease of 80% in harmful emissions by 2015.

Comments

stas peterson

For once CARB does something positive. They can do useful work, when they concentrate on the job that they have been chartered to do.

This forces retrofits for all on-road heavy duty diesel engines to match 2010 T2B5 equivalent standards.

Bravo. This way the heavy duty trucks in Caliofornia, will achieve reasonalble pollution emissions standards a few years earlier than if the fleet just aged and were repaced with vehicles conforming to 2010 T2B5 "clean diesel" standards.

Dave

Emissions from trucks is certainly most noticeable to your senses when driving on the road.

I frequently find myself changing from "fresh" to recirculated air to avoid the stench - and I'm sure a host of other nasties.

It would be very nice if trucks were clean enough that you could drive down the road without being assaulted by diesel exhaust.

Another major source of pollutants are small gas engines - two cases which I found highly annoying recently were a train ride powered by a small gas engine with no emissions controls and a tractor ride. If you ended up downwind of the engines, you could smell the raw fuel in the air.

Not to mention all those leaf blowers and lawn mowers out there. Electrifying these machines or perhaps converting them to natural gas would make things a lot more pleasant to be around.

Jared

18 premature deaths
290 asthma attacks
2600 days of work lost
15,000 minor restricted activity episodes ???

Apparently slipery bathtubs are more dangerous.

NCyder

@Jared

The slippery bathtub argument is a strawman. It would be a better analogy if you were forced to use the bath standing up and people came by at random and pushed you.

Not unlike the exposure all air-breathers are subjected to when a particularly particulate diesel drives by them.

Jared

It was a joke in reference to the small number of injuries.
I hate breathing diesel fumes as much as anyone else.

sulleny

@Stan: Does this mean the CARBs don't get gold watches now?

stas peterson

@ sulleny,

I am not incapable of recognizing good works in anybody.

Even Mr. Hitler and Mr Stalin both offered socialized health insurance, not to mention the sacrament of Abortion. Mr. Hitler even had the People's car designed for the world. And Both actively addressed problems of overpopulation, a subject dear to eco-Greens.

If the CARBite idiots had been paying attention to doing their own jobs instead of gallivanting off in twenty different directions to force the hydrogen chimera, and starving plants of necessary nutrients, they could have done more useful work.

They could have promulgated these standards for Class 8 diesels, two or three years ago.

They could have addressed non-road small gasoline engines, (lawn-mowers, leaf-blowers etc) several years ago rather than several months ago.

The big marine diesel standards would already be issued rather than merely being studied.

The fact that they are forced to address these secondary and tertiary pollution sources, show how far we have come. Their work is (and should have been already) done.

sulleny

Noted. However I prefer the name Mr. Shicklegruber.

Charles

Some thought about one aspect of the numbers.

ARB's cost of replacement numbers, "The regulation is projected to cost the trucking industry somewhere between $3.6 to $5.5 billion from 2010 to 2021."

Now for the real calculations/ not projections:(average number of trucks registered in California 450,000 +/- 50,000 so 400,000 registered trucks x average replacement value on one truck $100,000 = 40,000,000,000 billion.

Also not stated or commented on is intrastate trucking. Say good bye to 85% of the small trucking and construction businesses in California. What is the country made up of, small businesses? 1 billion in subsidies just won't cover it and should not be subsidized with tax money anyway!

One thing good that ARB will produce is the forced reduction of state tax revenue and the mandatory economic reduction of government.

I say BRAVO to that.

The comments to this entry are closed.