Gilbarco Veeder-Root and Coulomb Technologies Partner On Charging Infrastructure for Plug-Ins
Odyne Awarded Patent for Battery Energy Management and Monitoring System

Audi Introduces A4 TDI concept e: 59 mpg US

Au080413_medium
The A4 concept e at the Paris show. Click to enlarge.

Audi introduced the A4 TDI concept e at the Paris Motor Show. The diesel A4 TDI concept e offers fuel consumption of 3.99 L/100km (59 mpg US) and CO2 output of 105 grams per km (168.98 g/mile). The car accelerates from 0 to 100 kph (62 mph) in 10.7 seconds, and tops out at 206 kph (128 mph).

Audi achieved the fuel savings through what it calls the systematic use of efficiency modules, including the use of a start-stop system and energy recuperation system.

The powertrain of the Audi A4 TDI concept e uses a 2.0-liter direct-injection TDI engine with an output of 88 kW (120 hp) and 290 Nm (214 lb-ft) of torque from 1,750 to 2,500 rpm. The piezo injectors in the common-rail system inject the extremely finely atomized fuel at a pressure of up to 1,800 bar, and the special piston geometry provides optimized thermodynamics in the combustion chambers.

The 2.0 TDI also features a comprehensive package of additional efficient technologies. The oil cooler, the oil nozzles for cooling the piston crowns, the oil pump and the water pump have been designed so that they can be switched off—when inactive they do not require any power. New piston rings resulted in lower tangential forces, the spring pressure on the intake valves was reduced slightly, and the vacuum pump for the brake booster received a new actuator. These measures as a whole reduce emissions by 5 grams of CO2/km.

Other engine-related modifications include reduced internal friction, a new thermal management system during the warm-up phase and an electronically controlled fuel pump. Just as in the production version, Audi is using a thermostatically controlled cooling circuit with an internal heat exchanger for the automatic air conditioning system. It responds in a highly efficient manner—the system uses 20% less fuel than its predecessor. The A4 TDI concept e uses a new controller: the engine disconnects the air conditioning system’s compressor from its drive whenever possible.

Like other Audi production models, the A4 TDI concept e uses a recuperation system that converts the energy of motion during deceleration into usable electrical energy. In the deceleration and braking phases the A4 TDI concept e operates with increased secondary voltage. At this point, it is able to convert the kinetic energy into electrical energy; it is buffered in an absorbent glass mat battery. Whenever the sedan accelerates again, the battery feeds the energy back in, thus reducing the load on the alternator.

The 2.0 TDI transfers its power to a six-speed manual transmission with considerably reduced internal friction. It was specially customized to the high-torque TDI engine and has somewhat taller ratios for gears three through six. Most of the housing consists of ultra-light magnesium, which reduces weight by nearly 5 kg. A foam-packed skin serves as insulation, ensuring that the transmission oil heats up faster after the vehicle has been started. The drive shafts from the differential to the front wheels have also been redesigned.

The transmission is coupled to a start-stop system that switches the engine off whenever the sedan comes to a standstill. The TDI is deactivated whenever the A4 TDI concept e comes to a standstill, the shift lever is in the neutral position, and the driver’s foot is off the clutch pedal. It starts up again as soon as the driver steps on the clutch—a specially developed starter handles this in around two tenths of a second, which is faster and smoother than a traditional component. While the driver puts the vehicle in gear, the TDI speeds up; when the driver’s foot comes off the pedal, it drops down to idle speed.

An electro-mechanical part replaced the electro-hydraulic power steering. This yielded a further reduction of 4 grams of CO2/km. It does not have to circulate any hydraulic fluid, nor absorb any energy while the vehicle is traveling in a straight line—the electric motor which provides power assistance only kicks in if the driver turns the wheel.

Electrically actuated brakes are fitted at the rear. With active brake control, residual brake torque is almost non-existent. It only arises if the small air gap that is necessary for a stiff feel to the pedal and immediate brake response results in a slightly unevenly shaped disk rubbing on the lining. Using electrical rear-axle brakes will achieve the same effect on the front axle: here, an enlarged air gap is also possible since the power brake system only has to carry out the lining displacement for one axle.

Audi engineers further enhanced the aerodynamics of the concept e. A trunk lid with a restrained separating edge, the partially closed grid in the single-frame grille and sporty suspension tuning with optimized ride height contribute to the excellent drag coefficient of 0.25 (production model: 0.27).

The underbody of the technology study painted in Daytona Grey is faired much more extensively than the production model; the rear lights feature LED technology, which uses much less power than regular bulbs. Newly designed, dip-polished cast aluminum wheels, of the size 7.5 J x 17 improve the flow of air around the wheels and wheel housings. The tires are designed for smooth running, but also provide sporty grip due to their 225/50 R17 wide format.

The driver has two major aids in the A4 TDI to support eco-driving. An efficiency program that shows up on the instrument panel display acts like a trainer, pointing out open side windows or recommending rapid upshifting. The navigation system will always offer an especially fuel-saving route as an alternative whenever the driver enters a destination.

Audi has deployed a several ‘e’ models: the A3 1.9 TDI e and A3 Sportback 1.9 TDI e, the A6 2.0 TDI e and the A8 2.8 FSI e. Audi says it plans to expand its ‘e’ model line in the near future and start putting further technologies from its modular efficiency assembly into production.

Comments

mahonj

Sounds great - all doable, no crazy stuff.
So when will it trickle into production E cars?
Nice to see that it is a decent sized car with "reasonable" acceleration - none of this 7.9 seconds stuff.
Even if the production cars aren't quite as good as this, it will still be fantastic if they work (nearly) as well on the road as they do in tests.
But: a) lets see the cars and b) lets see independent tests.
And: Well done Audi!

Alex Kovnat

The tremendous job done by Audi, is another argument for the American road-going public to be allowed access to European and Asian automotive technology (Japanese, Korean, Chinese) without interference from politicians caving in to the "buy American" lobby.

Technically, the Audi concept car is a mild hybrid, rather than a full hybrid like the Toyota Prius. But then, when you're using a Diesel rather than an Otto-cycle engine, you don't need highly sophisticated full hybrid add-ons to achieve the same energy economy. I believe the American public is entitled to a wide range of choices, and Audi has certainly made their contribution to that.

GdB

If they could add a scaled down version of the larger hydraulic hybrid systems, a 150 lb system could accelerate it up to 40MPH. Cheap, lightweight, full hybrid, 100MPG city.

GrKEnvTech

There are two problems in the case of diesel engines:

1. Emissions control. Is there any particulate matter filter in audi e model?

2. Cost. All that complicated classic mechanical design increases the total cost and I don't believe would be a viable and economically attractive product. It's another Audi exercise!!!

The best solution seems to be a serial hybrid, like GM Volt. In this case the engine operates only at high efficiency areas in order to charge the batteries. In the case of Audi e, the most of the time, the engine will work in areas of extremely low efficiency.

The European car industry invested a lot of money in diesel technology but finally they are going to have real problems because diesel is not the solution!!! It's the real problem (cost + environment).

GrK

clett

"2. Cost. All that complicated classic mechanical design increases the total cost and I don't believe would be a viable and economically attractive product. It's another Audi exercise!!!"

Not necessarily. BMW have already applied almost all of the refinements of the Audi e concept to their entire current production range, under the banner 'efficient dynamics'. These are not expensive modifications when mass manufactured - there are still low hanging fruit to be had.

HarveyD

Well done Audi!

This is a good demonstration that most practical size cars could do 60+ mpg and pollute a lot less.


Similar techniques applied to HEVs could do 80+ mpg. Is that what the Prius III will do?

The same techniques applied to enhanced PHEVs could do 120+ mpg. That's probably what the Prius PHEV (and many others) will do in 2010+.

Manufacturers who will not do it will fold.

Alain

Let's say on average a car drives 150.000 km (some do more, some crash after 10 km).
At 105 gr/km, that would make 15 tons of CO2 for a car's life.
If I would pay 300$ / ton to produce an adequate amount of agrichar to remove my CO2, it would 'only' be 4500$. That's much cheaper than than any battery or hydrogen solution could do in the near future.
I'm convinced many farmers could do it for that price.

To drive my 150000 km I would need 6000 liters of diesel. But since this car only uses half the fuel of a regular car, even adding the 4500$ would still be far cheaper than driving a normal car of today without paying the 'carbonsequestration-tax'.

This is a very nice step in the right direction.

Peter

I don't see the cost problems that others do. Look at the cost premiums of the hybrids. Either way, you will not get something for nothing, but I don't see that the diesel premium is more than the hybrid premium.

MG

Any car that does not meet US emission standards should be considered more dirty than green.
It's the case with most diesels, despite all the low consumption (and low CO2) claims.
The recent studies of harmfulness of diesel particulate polution are very convincing.

For public health is much better to encourage the use of less poluting gasoline (also CNG and LPG) powered cars on congested city streets, than diesels.
Leave diesel fuel for heavy machinery and produce more aviation fuel instead of diesel.
Speed up development and introduction of more efficient HCCI (DiesOtto) engines.
And of course keep increasing the level of hybridization as price of batteries goes down.

Peter

MG, if biodiesel from algae comes on line as promised, I think many of your concerns will disappear. VW managed to make its TDI 50 state legal and keep the price down. I'm not an engineer, but I figure if VW can make its TDI legal, then most of these other diesels we see posted on GCC as Euro-only models could also be made 50 state legal, and that's running on petroleum-based ULSD. On biodiesel, the numbers would be much cleaner, not to mention the part about not sending money to countries where the majority of the population would like to see the majority of Americans and other westerners dead.

arnold

As one who appreciates attention to design details, I'm always supportive of cos that bring this aspect to the public.
MG points out that It may not meet the strict emission requirements. (I'm not sure in this case, but It certainley in their interest to meet this)
MG, biodeisels apparently have much lower emissions than convenional and may be a solution in this regard!
I would like to see the recouperative braking and idle stop system better described and the extra underbody fairing pursued.
Audi are not about to start producing low cost models, so it is good that some of their kudos is reflected in these fuel saving touches.

Raymond

While all these high-efficiency models in Europe sound like a great idea, unless they meet EPA's Tier 2 Bin 5 emissions standard they're non-starters (literally!) in the USA.

Because T2B5 certification for diesel engines still costs a lot of money to achieve (that's great if you an expensive BMW or Mercedes-Benz model that can absorb the cost of the emissions control; I wonder how much money Volkswagen is losing per car on their Jetta diesel models because of the expensive emission controls), here in the USA we're still going to go the gasoline/electric hybrid route, mostly because the technology is already proven and in large-scale production.

gada cohen

My son has a 2003 VW Jetta TDI with 220K miles. I recently drove from NH to Utah and from NH to NC with him and that car has plenty of chutzpah and handles great...AND driving hard, we were logging 41 mpg. Now I'm feeling like I really should be driving a more efficent car myself. Even though I really love my A6, it only gets low 20's mpg. With the newer, cleaner technology, I'm really looking forward to trading my (second) A6 for a super-efficient A4 TDI. Let's hope it's reasonably priced like the new Jetta TDI is so it will be widely accepted (and I can finish helping my 2 kids through college!)

Reagan Shallal

Can you please tell me if there is going to be a us A4 A5 diesel model soon. I am ready to buy if there is.


Thank You
Reagan Shallal
619-746-3655.

Arkan

Yes reagan they are going to make an audi that runs on diesel but ill still run you over in my truck

The comments to this entry are closed.