LiMn2O4 Nanorods Improve Li-Ion Cathode Performance
01 October 2008
![]() |
The nanorods, and capacity compared to commercial powders. Click to enlarge. Credit: ACS |
An international team led by Dr. Yi Cui at Stanford University has produced free-standing single-crystalline LiMn2O4 nanorods that, when used as a cathode material in Li-ion batteries, show a high charge storage capacity at high power rates compared with commercially available manganese spinel powders. A paper on their work was published online today in the ACS journal Nano Letters.
Lithium manganese spinel (LiMn2O4) is one of the current main cathode materials used and under development for Li-ion batteries for vehicles. The material is low-cost, environmentally friendly (compared to cobalt oxide cathodes) and abundant. It has high power capability and excellent safety, but relatively low energy—approximately 110 mAh/g, compared to 180 mAh/g in a nickelate system (e.g., LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2). It also faces known cycle life problems because of manganese dissolution, which is exacerbated at higher temperatures.
As a result, suggested Tien Duong, of the US Department of Energy (DOE), at the recent 1st International Conference on Advanced Lithium Batteries for Automobile Applications at Argonne National Laboratory, manganese spinel systems can meet HEV and PHEV-10 (plug-in hybrid with a 10-mile electric range) requirements, but would be harder pressed to be used in a PHEV-40 application.
The use of the nanorods could address some of those issues. In comparing their nanorod materials to a cathode material fabricated from commercial powders (LiMn2O4 electrochemical grade, Sigma Aldrich), the researchers observed that:
...the nanorod morphology has a much higher charge capacity than the commercial powders at higher power rates. At the lowest current (from cycle 1 to 5) both the samples have a specific capacity around 110 mAh/g but increasing the rate to 0.2 C (from cycle 6 to 10) leads a large difference in performance: the specific capacity of the nanorod electrode remains almost constant between 110 and 105 mAh/g while that of commercial powder decreases to 70 mAh/g.
In most of the literature a larger amount of conductive agent (up to 20%) is added to the active LiMn2O4 material and the specific discharge capacity obtained at moderate rates such as 0.2 C is comparable to that of our nanorods. However, we point out that in our nanorod case, reducing the amount of carbon black (10 wt %) and increasing the active material ratio means that more charges can be stored in the electrode regardless of the obtained LiMn2O4 specific capacity. This advantage results from the one-dimensional electron transport and large surface area of the nanorods.
The difference of specific charge capacity between the nanorods and commercial powders becomes larger with the further rate increase. At the highest current (148 mA/g), the nanostructured electrode can deliver a specific charge capacity (100 mAh/g) twice of the commercial powders (50 mAh/g).
Capacity retention after 100 cycles was 85%. The team suggests that the large surface-to-volume ratio of the nanorods enhances greatly the kinetics of the LiMn2O4 electrodes.
The research is supported by the Global Climate and Energy Project (GCEP) at Stanford and King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). In March, KAUST named Dr. Cui (one of the Stanford researchers who showed the potential of silicon nanowires for improving li-ion energy capacity and cycle life, earlier post), as one of its initial Global Research Partnership (GRP) Investigators. (Earlier post.)
Resources
Do Kyung Kim, P. Muralidharan, Hyun-Wook Lee, Riccardo Ruffo, Yuan Yang, Candace K. Chan, Hailin Peng, Robert A. Huggins, and Yi Cui (2008) Spinel LiMn2O4 Nanorods as Lithium Ion Battery Cathodes. ASAP Nano Lett., doi: 10.1021/nl8024328
Did I read that right? 100 cycles? That wouldn't even start to cut the mustard.
Posted by: OldNeil | 01 October 2008 at 10:40 AM
This does not sound very cool.
Posted by: | 01 October 2008 at 11:11 AM
That's probably 100 100% depth of discharge cycles. Still not very good. But it's a huge improvement over the old method.
Posted by: Dave | 01 October 2008 at 03:45 PM
As with many academic papers, the champion data look great but with questionable potential.
Just like Cui's Si nanowire work, the biggest hurdle they will face is to increase material loading (increase mA-hr) while keeping the resistance low enough to make a cell of any significance. After that, how to bring the cost down to a competitive $/KW level.
At this stage it's just academic fodder to lure investor money for a startup. Brilliant marketing maneuver though.
Posted by: Joe Martin | 01 October 2008 at 11:59 PM
I'd like to see a post test analysis on the nanorod size. I'll bet all the capacity fade is due to loss of surface area. Nano-anything is unstable because of the high surface to volume ratio.
Posted by: | 02 October 2008 at 09:21 AM
"Capacity retention after 100 cycles was 85%."
This project should be shut-down, the capacity retention is the worst I have seen in five years and is useless for EV apps.
Posted by: | 02 October 2008 at 11:38 AM
hehehe nobody can beat MIT's nLiFePO4 !!!
7,000 cycles 80% DoD, drops capacity to only 80%!
woohoooo - go A123 go!
Posted by: Mohsen | 02 October 2008 at 10:27 PM
Yeah, like the others said, these results are just plain bad. When Dr. Cui's work was first announced it was made out to be a huge advantage over other lithium battery technologies. Sure it beats the explosive qualities of lithium-cobalt but LiFePO4 batteries have already fixed that problem and some LiFePO4 makers are doing incredible things with their batteries (A123). 100 cycles is no good and this low energy density by weight is no good.
Posted by: David Herron | 13 October 2008 at 06:59 PM