Removal of “Super-Polluters” Can Reduce Nanoparticle Pollution by 25%
19 October 2008
A study by researchers from the University of Alcalá (Spain) shows that if “super-polluters”, the highest-polluting vehicles such as older buses and trucks in poor condition, were removed from urban streets, pollution from nanoparticles could be reduced by up to 25% and 48%, depending on the parameter analysed.
Sign of a superpolluter. Click to enlarge. Credit: Credits: Philip Siegmann-UAH/SINC |
The report concludes that were these vehicles removed from the flow of traffic, the total active surface (TAS) concentration of the nanoparticles (the particle surface that interacts with the environment) could be reduced by up to 25%, and the concentration of particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PPAH) absorbed by the nanoparticles, which are known toxic substances, could be reduced by up to 48%.
Usually you can see the ‘super-polluters’ simply just by looking; particularly when they accelerate or climb a hill and a cloud of smoke comes out of the exhaust pipe. People usually complain about the bad smell and the smoke, but the worst thing is that the nanoparticles that nobody can actually see or smell are always present in Madrid, for example, even when you think that you are breathing in clean air.
—Philip Siegmann, Department of Signal Theory and Communications at the University of Alcalá (UAH) and co-author
The study, published recently in the journal Atmospheric Environment, has focused on distinguishing and quantifying which types of vehicles have a higher emission rate of ultrafine nanoparticles (<100 nm) that are implicated in the development of different diseases. Their reduced size enables them to be distributed within the body with hardly any detection by the defences of the organism, and can even cross the cell membranes. Some studies have already shown that these small particles stimulate allergic reactions, such as asthma, and the development of multiple sclerosis. Moreover, under continued and prolonged exposure, they can produce cancer.
The researchers noted that one of the main emission sources of these ultra-fine particles comes from diesel powered vehicles, but this is less so for gasoline-powered vehicles.
To obtain measurements, the scientists followed moving vehicles and, through the window, recorded the data using two sensors located at the end of a tube. The recordings were taken every ten seconds and were made by sucking in the air so that the sensors could pick up the measurement peaks when they entered the trail of smoke emitted by a vehicle. In the case of the super-polluters, the PPAH measurement peaks ranged from 100 to 1,000 nm/m3, but in some cases this even exceeded this high quantity.
The study data were taken in Madrid in 2001 and 2006 and in Mexico City in 2001, one of the most polluted cities in the world. Although they do not appear in the report, measurements were also taken in Boston (USA). The highest number of emissions of nanoparticles corresponded to Madrid, and the scientists relate the data to the fact that a high percentage of the cars in this city are diesel (nearly 30% in 1999-2001 and 50% in 2006), whereas in Boston there are fewer emissions of this type because nearly all the vehicles travelling on the roads are gasoline driven. Mexico City finds itself in the middle, although there is a plethora of super-polluters in this city.
Nevertheless, in Madrid, the results confirm that over the last 6 years pollution from nanoparticles has reduced by nearly 65%. The researchers say this is because of the improvements that have been incorporated into new vehicles in order to comply with the European regulations regarding emissions, such as the Euro 4 level which will be replaced by the Euro 5 level in 2009.
Resources
P. Siegmann, F. J. Acevedo, K. Siegmann, S. Maldonado-Bascón. “A probabilistic source attribution model for nanoparticles in air suspension applied on the main roads of Madrid and Mexico City”. Atmospheric Environment 42 (17): 3937–3948, 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.021
They don't say what percentage of the vehicles they are talking about - is it < 1% or 5% ??
Nonetheless, all it really takes is a limit for nanoparticles for all diesel vehicles, starting now, which can be tightened up year by year over say 3-5 years and you have the worst polluters off the roads with minimum pain.
You could give a grant towards buying new vehicles, which could come for the health budget.
and/or
You could also provide low interest rate loans to help small businesses replace their vehicles.
The point is the very worst vehicles need to come off the roads immediately, without a starting revolution.
Posted by: mahonj | 19 October 2008 at 11:27 AM
Wondering what % reduction of nanoparticle pollution would be achieved there if ALL diesel burning vehicles were removed from urban streets.
It would be interesting to know what is the percentual contribution from burning aviation fuel (kerosene) to global nanoparticle emission.
Also the same data from coal burning and emission from large ships.
How long on average those particles remain in the air, and how do they get removed, with rain or ...?
Posted by: MG | 19 October 2008 at 01:20 PM
I dont know about anyone else, but I enjoy my 1984 F250 Indirect Injected, Non-Turbo diesel. I dont think I want anyone telling me I cannot operate or own it just because its old. It is a super polluter, just like the day it was made.
And what exactly is "poor condition" anyways? Rust? Discoloured paint? Mismatching hubcaps? Does this pollute? I think an old diesel can be in great operating condition (like mine) and still be a super polluter in their minds.
Shall we do this with out-of-date people, too? Perhaps gas-chambering everyone at age 50. Imagine what we could save on health care and Social Security benefits.
Nate H.
Dover, Ohio
Posted by: Nate H | 19 October 2008 at 03:38 PM
What is interesting is that up until the late 1990's, in many cities most taxis were powered by noisy, fuming diesel engines.
They're pretty much gone now, thanks to various financial incentives to switch to clean-burning compressed natural gas (Japan has been doing this since the late 1970's). In Hong Kong, every taxi is powered by CNG-fuelled engines by law.
Posted by: Raymond | 19 October 2008 at 04:46 PM