Beijing Won’t Restrict Private Car Purchases to Ease Traffic, Pollution
Evaluation of Shared Low-Speed Link to Public Transit Finds Demand Higher Among Day Users Than Commuters

Report: Climate Change Puts Forests and People At Risk; Adaptation Required to Avert Crisis

Cifor
Examples of measures for forest adaptation. Click to enlarge.

Unless immediate action is taken, climate change could have a devastating effect on the world’s forests and the nearly 1 billion people who depend on them for their livelihoods, according to a team of scientists from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

In their report—Facing an Uncertain Future: How Forests and People can Adapt to Climate Change—released in conjunction with the UNFCCC Conference of Parties meeting in Poznán, Poland, the CIFOR researchers call for the implementation of adaptation measures to reduce the vulnerability of the forests and forest-dependent communities that will experience an unprecedented combination of climate change-associated disturbances like flooding, drought, wildfire, and other environmental challenges in the next 100 years.

The imperative to assist forests and forest communities to adapt to climate change has been poorly addressed in national policies and international negotiations. The adaptation challenge is being treated as secondary to mitigation, and yet the two are inextricably linked.

—Frances Seymour, Director General of CIFOR

If managed properly, forests can greatly assist vulnerable communities adapt to the impacts of climate change, yet if they are not managed sustainably, forests will exacerbate these impacts. Similarly, because of their ability to take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, forests have the potential to be a big part of the solution to climate change. However, if forests are destroyed, the increasing amount of carbon in the atmosphere could lead to the destruction of what remains. It is a self-perpetuating cycle, according to the report.

“For many forest communities, adapting to climate change is already a matter of survival. We need to act now to ensure a better future.”
—Frances Seymour

Forests provide millions of people with income, food, medicines and building materials and deliver many vital ecosystem services like flood or drought regulation and water purification, according to CIFOR’s report. They are, therefore, critical to the ability of human societies to adapt to climate change.

The report identifies two related but distinctive adaptation responses. One of these would aim to adapt forest management and conservation to reduce the impacts of climate change on forest ecosystems.

We have identified two broad categories of adaptation measures for forest ecosystems. The first is to buffer ecosystems against climate-related disturbances like improving fire management to reduce the risk of uncontrolled wildfires or the control of invasive species. In plantations, we can select species that are better suited to coping with the predicted changes in climate. The second would help forests to evolve towards new states better suited to the altered climate. In this way we evolve with the changing climate rather than resist it.

—Bruno Locatelli, CIFOR scientist and lead author

A second adaptive response is to help the people who are managing, living in or conserving forests to adapt to future changes.

The report reviews the scientific literature on the effects of climate change on forests. Among the findings are:

  • By the end of the 21st century, tropical regions in Africa, South Asia, and Central America are likely or very likely to be warming at a faster rate than the global annual mean warming.

  • Rainfall in East Africa and during the summer monsoon of South and Southeast Asia is likely to increase.

  • Annual precipitation in most of Central America is likely to decrease; this region is the most prominent tropical hotspot of climate change. It is unclear how rainfall in the African Sahel and the Amazon will change.

  • Peak wind intensities of tropical cyclones are likely to increase, in particular in tropical Southeast Asia and South Asia, bringing extreme rainfall.

  • Droughts and floods are expected to increase globally, making water management more difficult.

In many forests, relatively minor changes in climate can have devastating consequences, increasing their vulnerability to drought, insect attack and fire. Burning or dying forests emit large quantities of greenhouse gases, so there is a chance that an initially small change in climate could lead to much bigger changes.

—Markku Kanninen, co-author

Mountain forests might be the first to disappear. Mangrove forests in coastal parts of West Africa, which help mitigate storms and underpin many commercial fisheries, are highly vulnerable to rising sea levels, according to the report. Some mangroves are expected to dry out almost completely—droughts in Senegal and The Gambia have already had devastating effects on mangrove communities.

Scientists have already found examples of biodiversity loss due to climate change. In the highland cloud forests of Costa Rica, the lifting of the cloud base associated with increased ocean temperatures has been linked to the disappearance of 20 species of frogs. Several studies have predicted that decreased rainfall in the biodiversity-rich Amazon would cause massive dieback of the forest and its large-scale substitution by savannah.

Tropical dry forests are also highly vulnerable. Only slight decreases in rainfall, predicted in many regions, will make them more susceptible to fire and to long-term ecological shifts that potentially could cause the extinction of thousands of species.

—Markku Kanninen

According to the report, adaptation policy must be multi-sectoral. For example, ministries of transportation have an interest in conserving healthy forests. Haze from forest fires in Indonesia is often thick enough to close airports, while landslides often close roads. Drinking water or hydroenergy companies in South America are starting to consider upstream ecosystem management, including forests, in order to reduce their vulnerability and ensure the quality and quantity of their water supply.

Headquartered in Indonesia, the Center for International Forestry Research is an international forestry research organization established in response to global concerns about the social, environmental, and economic consequences of forest loss and degradation. CIFOR is one of 15 research centers within the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).

Resources

Comments

sulleny

In a recent study conducted at the Aspen FACE (Free Air CO2 Enrichment) program, investigators observed effects of elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and ozone (O3) on radial growth, wood chemistry and structure of five 5-year-old trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) clones and the wood chemistry of paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) saplings.

http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/8894

The researchers found that, "elevated CO2 in the presence of ambient O3 tended to increase, and elevated O3 in the presence of ambient CO2 tended to decrease, stem radial growth in aspen after a 5-year exposure, whereas stem radial growth of trees in the combined elevated CO2 + O3 treatment did not differ from controls."

The birch saplings also exhibited "a tendency for increased stem diameter in elevated CO2," they write that "elevated CO2 caused ... an increase in extractives" -- such as fats, waxes, triterpenoids and steroids -- "which have important roles in defense against pathogens and other biotic attacks."

Conclusion: is that elevated atmospheric CO2 demonstrates growth fertilization and (in birch) pathogenic defense. This "can be foreseen to shorten (forest) rotation lengths, with only moderate changes in wood properties,"

Elevated O3 indicated reduction in stem wood production and vessel properties.

Aussie

There is no doubt there will be tension over forests even if the GHG and rainfall effects are unclear. In Australia banks declined to finance a $A1.8bn wood pulp mill. People are clearly unhappy about cutting down the remaining stands of tall native trees. I think a key factor will be liquid fuels. Logging and tree planting could slow down dramatically if diesel disappears but it could speed up if there is a breakthrough in cellulosic ethanol.

Mr. Environment

"Climate Change Puts Forests and People At Risk..."

Well, thank God! The indisputable scientific consensus is that much of the Midwest portion of the USA was covered by glaciers at one time. When Global Warming came about, melting said glaciers (sorry, no SUVs traipsing around mother Earth at that time) animals had to adapt to living in the Midwest in moderate climates, no longer covered by ice. OH, THE HORRORS!!!

You Global Warming = Global Cooling = Climate Change people are so silly! Focus our resources on the pollution problem, not on regulating breathing (CO2), a non-pollutant.

how to write a management report

it really exchange

Stew Dent

Mr. Environment:

You apparently fail to understand the gravity of the CO2 situation. While it may be true that we are headed into a new modern cool period - maybe you didn't know that CO2 saved planet earth from the "snowball effect" 600 million years ago in the geologic "cryogenic period."

Without CO2 to warm the crustiferous buns of the planet - we all might still be in a deep freeze. As the (retracted GCC article) points out - CO2 can be both saint and sinner. Maing your point about religious fanaticism moot... er, a hoot! Gobless.

Mark_BC

From a link today after I logged out of hotmail:

Regarding the Wilkins Ice Shelf in Antarctica,

"Earlier this week, another section broke away, meaning the shelf itself - which scientists believe is more than 1,000 years old - is also weakening.

Soon, the ice could break away from the continent entirely, becoming a free-floating iceberg about half the size of Vancouver Island. The slab of ice is so large that seventy countries are actually smaller in area."

http://news.sympatico.msn.ctv.ca/abc/home/contentposting.aspx?isfa=1&feedname=CTV-TOPSTORIES_V3&showbyline=True&date=true&newsitemid=CTVNews%2f20081129%2fAntarctic_Collapse_081129

Will S

Stew wrote:

> Without CO2 to warm the crustiferous buns of the planet - we all might still be in a deep freeze.

And without water, this would be a dry planet. What's your point? Yes, there is CO2 in the atmosphere, but current weather and precipitation patterns are being impacted by the reintroduction of carbon that had been sequestered for millions of years. Productive farmland which turns to marginal rangeland or desert means less food, at a time when the food stockpiles are at their lowest levels in recorded history.

Stew Dent

Thanks Will: I did a little homework on this and discover the following with regard to food stockpiles:

"Since government food stockpiles are largely a thing of the past, most US food aid is now purchased through government procurement systems (PL480). Over the past half century, PL480 programs alone have contributed more than 340 million metric tons of food aid to save and improve the lives of hundreds of millions of poor and hungry people around the world.

Program food aid (Title I) has declined more than 90% since 1980 in inflation-adjusted terms, while emergency and project food aid under Title II have increased significantly since the end of the Cold War in 1989-1990, when food security was made a formal objective of American food aid.

On CO2 - read the un-retracted GCC aticle on Snowball Earth. It's chillin.

Stew Dent

Thanks Will: I did a little homework on this and discover the following with regard to food stockpiles:

"Since government food stockpiles are largely a thing of the past, most US food aid is now purchased through government procurement systems (PL480). Over the past half century, PL480 programs alone have contributed more than 340 million metric tons of food aid to save and improve the lives of hundreds of millions of poor and hungry people around the world.

Program food aid (Title I) has declined more than 90% since 1980 in inflation-adjusted terms, while emergency and project food aid under Title II have increased significantly since the end of the Cold War in 1989-1990, when food security was made a formal objective of American food aid.

On CO2 - read the un-retracted GCC article on Snowball Earth. It's chillin.

Stew Dent

Thanks Will: I did a little homework on this and discover the following with regard to food stockpiles:

"Since government food stockpiles are largely a thing of the past, most US food aid is now purchased through government procurement systems (PL480). Over the past half century, PL480 programs alone have contributed more than 340 million metric tons of food aid to save and improve the lives of hundreds of millions of poor and hungry people around the world.

Program food aid (Title I) has declined more than 90% since 1980 in inflation-adjusted terms, while emergency and project food aid under Title II have increased significantly since the end of the Cold War in 1989-1990, when food security was made a formal objective of American food aid.

On CO2 - read the un-retracted GCC article on Snowball Earth. It's chillin.

pardon triple post error.

Will S

Stew,

I have no doubt that CO2 keeps the Earth warmer than it would be without CO2. The point is; Why would we want to alter the current temperature and rainfall patterns that support our agricultural output? Look at Australia as the canary in the coal mine (and northern China, southwest US, etc) in terms of dropping agricultural output.


The weather scares me as well...

aym

The ability of CO2 fertilization to effect plant growth is at times overstated. It is dependent on the plant types. Certain plants evolved in times when CO2 was higher. They will be able to take advantage, all thing being equal, of the situation. Others will not.

The point being, all things being equal, which will not happen in a higher CO2 environment. And not one in which CO2 levels have changed as fast as this one. Animals are mobile. Plants are not. Weather patterns will change. Some for the better. More for the worse. CO2 fertilization will mitigate but not solve the CO2 problem and as the article states, climatic changes and land use from climatic change may cause release of CO2 of already stored carbon in forests that exist now.

The comments to this entry are closed.