Cambodia Launches First Ethanol Plant
Electric Truck Exclusively Options Regenerative Magnetic Shock Absorber Technology from Tufts

Road Emissions Dominate Long-Term Global Transport Climate Impact

After 100 years today’s global road emissions will lead to a temperature increase that is six times greater than the temperature increase from today’s air transport, according to a study by researchers at the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research - Oslo (CICERO) in Norway.

The study—“Global temperature responses to current emissions from the transport sectors”—includes the effects of all climate-relevant components of the emissions, not only CO2. It will appear in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The study examines the effect of total global emissions, not emissions per passenger kilometer. The researchers will calculate climate impacts per passenger kilometer in a later study.

The study has investigated how the global emissions from different transport sectors (road, rail, shipping, and aviation) in year 2000 affect the future temperature. While air transport has some strong climate effects that decrease relatively quickly over time, emissions from road transport have a strong and long-lasting effect on climate. The reason is the much larger total fuel consumption and thus higher CO2 emissions from road traffic, while for aviation there is a strong short-term warming by aviation-induced contrails and cirrus clouds.

In contrast to road transport, air transport has several strong, but short lasting, effects on the global temperature. But there are large uncertainties in our understanding of these effects. It is important to work towards reducing this uncertainty.

—Jan Fuglestvedt, co-author

Current shipping emissions differ from emissions from the road and aviation sectors by having a cooling effect—resulting from the very high emissions of SO2 and NOx—on climate that lasts 30-70 years. However, the warming effect will dominate in the long term because shipping also emits significant amounts of CO2.

Neither international shipping nor international aviation is covered by the Kyoto Protocol today. Ongoing climate negotiations are debating whether one these emissions should be included in a post-Kyoto agreement.

Understanding the climate impact of transportation requires not only taking into account the total quantity of emissions, but also how emissions of various components interact with one another and the climate, the authors say. Transportation emits a broad mix of components with very different characteristics with respect to climate impacts. They operate on different timescales and cause both warming and cooling. Although aviation emits between 2-3% of the total human-produced CO2 emissions, effects down the cause-effect chain must be considered when assessing the climate impacts of this sector.

When we quantify and compare the climate impacts of the different transport sectors, the conclusions will vary strongly depending on which method and climate indicator is used and the adopted time perspectives. In this work we have looked at the emissions’ effect on global mean temperature. This is a significant step forward compared to earlier work. In our previous study we quantified the climate impacts in terms of accumulated radiative forcing, which is similar to the Global Warming Potential (GWP) method used in the Kyoto Protocol.

—Jan Fuglestvedt

Integrated radiative forcing and GWPs give equal weight to effects over time up to the chosen time horizon. When used on short-lived gasses and particles with strong climate effect, this characteristic of GWP can give results that are quite different from those obtained when using temperature as indicator, Fuglestvedt said.



"After 100 years today’s global road emissions will lead to a temperature increase..."

Another colossal WASTE of money paying for these reports. The people signing their names to these studies should begin to think about the cost of lost credibility. At some point not too far away, an analysis of money wasted on spurious studies and people supporting them is going to begin. The relatively small income these grants provide researchers will never counter the permanent damage caused to credibility.

It is sad to see these poor people delude themselves.


Well how bout that. The solution to Climate Change...



Low carbon fuel with RENEWABLE HYDROGEN(HCNG) can help to
reduce CO2 level in ambient air.

The comments to this entry are closed.