Emirates Airline to Trial Environmental Program on Inaugural Dubai-San Francisco Flight
US House Passes $14B Auto Industry Restructuring Package

Report Concludes That 19% of World’s Coral Reefs Already Lost

The world has lost 19% of its coral reefs, according to the 2008 global update of the world’s reef status. The Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2008 report is the 5th global report since the GCRMN (Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network), was formed in 1996 as an operational network of the International Coral Reef Initiative (ICRI).

Estimates assembled through the expert opinions of 372 coral reef scientists and managers from 96 countries are that 15% of reefs are seriously threatened with loss within the next 10–20 years, and 20% are under threat of loss in 20–40 years. The latter two estimates have been made under a ‘business as usual’ scenario that does not consider the threats posed by global climate change or that effective future management may conserve more coral reefs.

However, 46% of the world’s reefs are regarded as being relatively healthy and not under any immediate threats of destruction, except for the ‘currently unpredictable’ global climate threat. Another positive sign is the ability of some corals to recover after major bleaching events, caused by warming waters, and to adapt to climate change threats.

Climate change is considered the biggest threat to coral reefs today. The main climate threats, such as increasing sea surface temperatures and seawater acidification, are being exacerbated by other threats including overfishing, pollution and invasive species.

If nothing changes, we are looking at a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide in less than 50 years. As this carbon is absorbed, the oceans will become more acidic, which is seriously damaging a wide range of marine life from corals to plankton communities and from lobsters to seagrasses.

—Carl Gustaf Lundin, Head of the IUCN Global Marine Programme, one of the organizations behind the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network

The report shows that, globally, the downward trend of recent years has not been reversed. Major threats in the last four years, including the Indian Ocean tsunami, more occurences of bleaching, outbreaks of coral diseases and ever-heavier human pressures, have slowed or reversed recovery of some coral reefs after the 1998 mass bleaching event.

The report details the strong scientific consensus that climate change must be limited to the absolute minimum. If nothing is done to substantially cut emissions, we could effectively lose coral reefs as we know them, with major coral extinctions.

—Clive Wilkinson, Coordinator of the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network

Corals have a higher chance of survival in times of climate change if other stress factors related to human activity are minimized. Well-managed marine protected areas can also boost the health of coral reefs, but proper enforcement is difficult, especially in remote areas where the most pristine reefs are found.

The report makes a number of summary recommendations, including:

  • Urgently combat global climate change. Current rates of climate change pose the greatest threat to the long-term sustainability of coral reefs and human coastal communities.

  • Maximize coral reef resilience by minimizing direct human pressures on reefs. The second major threat to reefs derives from direct human activities: over-fishing and destructive fishing; sediment pollution from poor land use; runoff of nutrients and other pollution; and habitat loss through unsustainable development. Control of these threats, which are damaging reefs around the world especially in developing countries including small island developing states, will improve the resilience of coral reefs in the face of climate change.

  • Scale up management of protected areas. There is a need to improve the management of existing marine protected areas (MPAs) to accelerate restoration of depleted fish stocks and protect coral reef goods and services that underpin coastal economies and livelihoods. This includes managing adjacent catchment areas to prevent nutrient and sediment pollution to create buffer areas that will reinforce MPA management activities.

  • Include more reefs in MPAs. A proven and effective governance approach for conserving coral reefs and promoting sustainable use is to include them in effectively managed MPAs.

  • Protect remote reefs. There are many coral reefs remote from continental land masses and human populations that, if they are protected, will be able to act as reservoirs of biodiversity to replenish depleted reefs. The report recommends establishing more MPAs to include many of the remote island reefs, such as those to the west of Hawai‘i, in Kiribati, and the Coral Sea east of the Great Barrier Reef.

  • Improve enforcement of MPA regulations. Enforceable governance systems will be required to deal with the formidable problem of regulating access to managed ecosystems (including types and rates of resource exploitation).

  • Help improve decision making with better ecological and socioeconomic monitoring.

A second new report, this one on the state of Indian Ocean coral reefs, launched by CORDIO, an organization aligned with the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, states an overall trend of continued degradation, only alleviated by signs of recovery in some areas.

With this report, the far-reaching degradation of Indian Ocean coral reefs has become evident. To save coral reefs, we must focus on helping corals to adapt to climate change and on diverting people away from destructive practices such as overfishing.

—Olof Linden of the CORDIO network and Professor at the World Maritime University (WMU), Malmö, Sweden
Clips from the press conference releasing the report.

Resources

Comments

Alberto G.

.

...does not consider the threats posed by global climate change...

Mother Earth is SOOoooo EVIL to be destroying coral reefs!!! Since Global Warming/Global Cooling (now termed Climate Change so that we can't be wrong no matter what we say - cool!!!) is increasing/decreasing Earth's temperatures we MUST find a way to extradite Mother Earth, lock her up, and see to it that she is STOPPED!

.

ai_vin

@Alberto G.

Just so you, us greens have always said (and still say) it's Global Warming. It was the AGW denier's spin doctors who insisted on calling it "Climate Change" because it sounded less threatening (people assume 'climate' is the same as 'weather' and we all know the weather is constantly changing)- http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=522784499045867811 -we just gave them that point because it wasn't the real issue.

But having been given that inch the AGW deniers (not us) have taken a mile and are now calling it Global Cooling. What they are doing is *cherrypicking* really hot years in the record and saying 'hey look all the years after this date were cooler so AGW must be over.'

bud

Alberto
No...actually mother earth is out of balance.
The ecosystem that was once in equilibrium, in terms of carbon flux, has now been shifted out of balance because people have removed fossil carbon from where it was in permanent storage and released it into the atmosphere. Since 1800 an additional 400 billion tons of fossil carbon (1.4 trillion tons of CO2 equivalent) has been dumped.

The oceans regularily absorb much of the carbon, a cumulative 135 billion tons, but have reached a point of chemical imbalance now. The oceans cannot continue to absorb this excess carbon and as a result the pH of the ocean has decreased by .1 unit which is a considerable amount in terms of chemical equilibrium, since these are logarithmic funtions.

Ocean acidification is a seperately quantified problem and has nothing to do with the temperature of the air, or climate or global warming or whether you think the air temperature is cooler or not. It also is not disputed by any scientific body that I know of.

The problem with GW deniers is that they find it difficult to accept reponsibility for the role of humankind in this; they want business as usual for whatever reason...oil/coal industry profit, laziness...inconvenience. I also think a big part of the problem is society wide scientific illiteracy, another issue but is at the heart of GW denial.

Mark_BC

It would be interesting to see what would happen by transplanting corals from the Red Sea to reefs hit by warming temperatures would. I've been on reefs there in very warm water, in excess of 35 C maybe even 40.

JamesG

What if the most important coral reef problem was the direct human problems mentioned above ie destructive fishing and pollution, and not ocean acidification? Then we'd be placing emphasis on the wrong thing and failing to solve the real problem. Is there evidence for that idea? Yes. While Florida's coral is in a really bad state, Cuba's coral is absolutely pristine. This is the same sea, 20 miles apart. The difference is that Cuba doesn't encourage fishing boats - for obvious reasons. Much as I want fossil fuel use to be controlled, this is a clear and obvious benchmark that ocean acidification is a red herring. And it's a symptom of the current collection of earth scientists that they hang everything on CO2. Why does this happen? Because that's where the funds are - while usually the real problem lies elsewhere and is more direct. Exactly the same scenario has played out regarding dead zones. Nobody can get any money to tackle the real source of the problem - runoff and pollution, so they have to tie it into global warming (eg warming makes the problem worse) in order to get money. Seemingly linking something to global warming or ocean acidification is by far the most likely way to get funds for environmental protection. But that's only because scientists have to link every problem to it in order to get funding. It's a ridiculous and ultimately self-defeating, vicious circle which everyone knows about yet few admit.

Bob Russell

Given that the above comments re AGW are correct, why does the green movement continue to fight nuclear power? Instead of solving the problems with storage, etc. for the past forty years, environmentalists have continued to spread FUD instead of working to resolve the political problems.

Hysteria and zealotry are at the base of most of today's energy problems. Nuclear power is the only source of energy that can be truly non-polluting. Those who have studied it have known this since before the movie that spread so much propaganda, China Syndrome.

The comments to this entry are closed.