Forecast: Demand for Catalysts in the Refining Industry to Reach $3.7B by 2011
EERC and Tesoro Partner on $1M Project to Produce Refinery-Based Renewable Drop-in Fuels from Crambe and Other Oilseed Crops

Glaciers Worldwide Continuing to Melt at High Rates

Glaciers around the globe are continuing to melt at high rates, according to data from the World Glacier Monitoring Service (WGMS) at the University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Tentative figures for the year 2007 indicate a further loss of average ice thickness from more than 80 glaciers of roughly 0.67 meter water equivalent (mwe). Some glaciers in the European Alps lost up to 2.5 wme.

Glaciers with available long-term observation series around the world (30 glaciers in 9 mountain ranges) show a thickness reduction of 1.3 and 0.7 meters water equivalent (mwe) during the hydrological years 2006 and 2007, respectively.

The new data continues the global trend in accelerated ice loss over the past few decades and brings the cumulative average thickness loss of the reference glaciers since 1980 at almost 11.3 mwe.

The average ice loss in 2007 was not as extreme as in 2006, but there were large differences between mountain ranges. Glaciers in the European Alps lost up to 2.5 meters water equivalent of ice, whereas maritime glaciers in Scandinavia were able to gain more than a meter in thickness. However, 2007 is now the sixth year of this century in which the average ice loss of the reference glaciers has exceeded half a meter. This has resulted in a more than doubling of the melt rates of the 1980s and 90s.

—Michael Zemp, glaciologist and research associate of the WGMS

Glaciologists express the annual mass balance, i.e. the gain or loss in thickness, of a glacier in ‘meter water equivalent’ (mwe). This standardized unit takes the different densities of change measurements in ice, firn and snow into account. One meter of ice thickness corresponds to about 0.9 mwe.

Comments

Andrey Levin

And this is from about 160 000 glaciers around the world. Quite representative sample…

kelly

Statistically more than enough to be representative..

Reel$$

“Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress...”
Dr. John S. Theon, January 27, 2009

Seeing that Dr. James (Gloom and Doom) Hanson has just been publicly rebuked by his former NASA boss - there is little the AGW cult can do but slink away in shame.

http://tinyurl.com/aawoj5

We have said many times now that the loss of credibility by the global warming cult has so damaged their reputation that NO ONE believes a word of anything they say these days. The unfortunate result of grandiosity and hubris consuming the priests of grandiosity and hubris.

Andrey Levin

Sure thing, Kelly, 80 glaciers out from 160 000 is representative sample. Especially if you already know politically correct answer.

Also would be interesting to hear explanations why glaciers in Southern Hemisphere are melting. Because according to all measurements climate in Southern Hemisphere did not warm at all in at leat 40 years.

Probably Southern glaciers are melting from precautionary principle? Or because it is right thing to do anyway?

The comments to this entry are closed.