New Spectroscopy Technique Clarifies Structural Changes of Silicon Anodes in Li-ion Battery
27 March 2009
Stacked plots of in situ 7Li static NMR spectra and electrochemical profile of the first discharge (C) of an actual crystalline Si vs Li/Li+ battery. Credit: ACS. Click to enlarge. |
Using a new spectroscopy technique, researchers at SUNY at Stony Brook (New York) and Université de Picardie Jules Verne (Amiens, France) have clarified some of the structural changes undergone by silicon anodes in lithium-ion batteries. The researchers also identified a previously unknown self-discharge mechanism that can be countered. A paper on their work was published online 19 March in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Silicon is conceptually a much more attractive anode material for lithium-ion batteries than the currently predominant carbon electrodes because of its very high gravimetric energy density (3,572 mAh g-1 vs 372 mAh g-1 for carbon) and “massive” volumetric capacity (8,322 mAh cm-3)—approximately 10 times that of graphite. Lithium-ion batteries with silicon anodes could offer much greater capacities than current generation lithium-ion batteries, making them especially attractive in applications such as plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles.
However, silicon anodes are problematic because the material’s volume changes by up to 300-400% upon the insertion and extraction of lithium ions during charge/discharge cycles. This results in pulverization and capacity fading, as well as design issues, since the expansion needs to be managed within the cell.
Researchers are exploring a variety of approaches to address those problems, including using composite electrodes of silicon and carbon, coated with a binder such as CMC (carboxymethylcellulose), to maintain particle-particle contact after many charge/discharge cycles; limiting the voltages over which the material is cycled, thereby limiting the extent of volumetric expansion by sacrificing some capacity, and using nanoparticles and nanowires to improve capacity retention.
Such work, note the authors in their paper, “may result in the commercialization of a next generation of Li-ion batteries with silicon negative electrodes in the near future.”
However, the exact nature of the processes that limit the cycle life has been poorly understood up to now.
The binary phase diagram of Li-Si system consists of four reported crystalline lithium silicides, from Li12Si7, to the increasingly lithium-rich phases Li7Si3, Li13Si4 and Li21Si5. However, at room temperature, silicon does not form any of these phases on electrochemical lithiation, but instead undergoes a crystalline to amorphous phase transition, forming a lithiated amorphous silicide. This phase then recrystallizes at deep discharge to form a metastable phase, Li15Si4, which is isostructural to the thermodynamic phase, Li15Ge4. This final composition provides the theoretical capacity of 3.75 Li per Si (3,572 mA hg-1). Interestingly, lithiated nanoparticles of crystalline and amorphous thin films less than 2 µm thickness of silicon do not recrystallize at deep discharge. Unfortunately, due to the amorphous nature of the lithiated silicides, it is not possible to monitor all the structural changes that occur during lithium insertion/removal with conventional methods such as diffraction. The short-range order of the amorphous materials remains unknown, preventing attempts to optimize performance based on electrochemical-structure correlations.
—Key et al. (2009)
In their work, the researchers used a flexible plastic lithium-ion battery (LIB) design and a combination of static, in situ and MAS, ex situ 7Li and 29Si NMR spectroscopy as local structural probes in order to monitor/identify the changes in the short-range order that occur during the first discharge of crystalline silicon in a working LIB. They showed that their method can be used to capture changes that cannot be readily seen by ex situ methods.
They also found that one of the various lithium silicide phases formed during battery operation reacts with the battery electrolyte in a self-discharge process.
This excess-Li phase is extremely reactive in the electrolyte and the Li-Si cell “self-discharges”, leading to the loss of Li from this phase, and an accompanying increase in the open circuit voltage. The amorphous lithium silicides also appear to be reactive and the self-discharge mechanisms at lower stages of discharge are currently under investigation, along with a more detailed analysis of the changes that occur during the first charge and in subsequent discharge-charge cycles.
The self-discharge mechanism could represent a mechanism for capacity loss in Si batteries if they are discharged to too low voltages, which can occur if the batteries are cycled at too high rates. Furthermore, the reactivity of this phase may also be a safety concern. However, our preliminary experiments indicate that CMC inhibits this discharge process significantly, cells taking days to months to relax. These results indicate that the strong binding of CMC to silicon is important in preventing capacity loss due to side reactions with the electrolyte.
Finally, the results highlight the ability of in situ NMR methods to capture dynamic processes that are not straightforward to observe by using ex situ NMR methods. A wide range of different applications of the method to investigate different LIB electrode materials and intercalation/conversion processes, along with side-reactions such as those associated with SEI formation can be foreseen.
—Key et al. (2009)
Resources
Baris Key, Rangeet Bhattacharyya, Mathieu Morcrette, Vincent Seznc, Jean-Marie Tarascon and Clare P. Grey (2009) Real-Time NMR Investigations of Structural Changes in Silicon Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc., Article ASAP doi: 10.1021/ja8086278
Comments