Researchers Develop New Bacterial Strain with Higher Butanol Tolerance; Potential to Double the Output of Biobutanol from Conventional Bacterial Fermentation
Massachusetts to Accept Only Waste-Derived Biofuels to Qualify for Mandate for Diesel and Home Heating Oil

IIHS Finds smart fortwo Has Strongest Roof Among Tested MY2009 Micro and Minicars

The Smart Fortwo has the strongest roof among MY2009 micro and minicars recently tested by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The Smart earns the highest IIHS rating of “good”; IIHS rated the Honda Fit, Hyundai Accent, Mini Cooper, and Toyota Yaris as “acceptable”, and the Chevy Aveo as “marginal”.

In the Institute’s test, a metal plate is pushed against 1 side of a roof at a constant speed. To earn a good rating, a roof must withstand a force of 4 times the vehicle’s weight before reaching 5 inches of crush. This is called a strength-to-weight ratio. For an acceptable rating, the minimum required ratio is 3.25. A marginal rating value starts at 2.5; anything lower than that is poor. The current federal standard is 1.5.

Compared with the current federal standard of 1.5, a strength-to-weight ratio of 4 reflects an estimated 50 percent reduction in the risk of serious or fatal injury in single-vehicle rollover crashes.

—IIHS President Adrian Lund

Roof strength testing results. Source: IIHS. Click to enlarge.

The smart withstood a force of 5.4 times its weight. The Aveo withstood a force of just over 3 times its weight.

The IIHS rating system is based on Institute research showing that occupants in rollover crashes benefit from stronger roofs. Vehicles rated good must have roofs that are more than twice as strong as the current minimum federal safety standard requires. The ratings, products of the Institute’s new roof strength testing program, add to consumer information tests that rate vehicles for front, side, and rear crashworthiness. The roof test is designed to help consumers pick vehicles that will help protect them in rollover crashes.

Roofs have gotten stronger during the past few years, Institute research shows. Part of the reason is that automakers have made structural improvements to earn better front and side ratings in Institute tests. Strong A and B pillars help prevent intrusion in these types of crashes. They also help hold up the roof.

Small cars should have an easier time with the roof strength test. Their light weight means their roofs don’t have to work as hard to keep the structure around the occupants intact in a rollover.

—Adrian Lund

About 10,000 people a year are killed in rollovers. When vehicles roll, their roofs hit the ground, deform, and crush. Stronger roofs crush less, reducing the risk of injury from contact with the roof itself. Stronger roofs also can prevent people, especially those who aren’t using safety belts, from being ejected through windows, windshields, or doors that have broken or opened because the roof deformed. Roofs that don't collapse help keep people inside vehicles as they roll.

The best protection is to keep vehicles from rolling in the first place. Electronic stability control is significantly reducing rollovers, especially fatal single-vehicle ones. When vehicles do roll, side curtain airbags help protect people. Belt use is essential.

Cars have been built to meet the same roof crush standard, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 216, since 1973. The rule was extended in 1994 to include all passenger vehicles up to a gross weight rating of 6,000 pounds. Many SUVs and pickup trucks are heavier, so they’re exempt.

In April, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration unveiled a new rule that doubles the current roof strength requirement (strength-to-weight ratio of 1.5) for vehicles with weight ratings up to 6,000 pounds. Roofs on vehicles with weight ratings 6,000 to 10,000 pounds will be required to withstand a force equal to 1.5 times their unloaded weight. Another requirement is that roofs maintain sufficient headroom during testing. For the first time, the government also will require the same performance on both sides of the roof when tested sequentially. Phase-in begins in September 2012, and all vehicles must comply by September 2016.

A good roof strength rating will be a new requirement to earn the Institute’s TOP SAFETY PICK award for 2010. This is the second time criteria for this award have been tightened since the first winners were announced in 2005. Availability of electronic stability control became a requirement starting with 2007s.



Is it a surprise that the best results for roof strenght for Minis and SUVs are VW products (Smart & Tiguan) with 5.14 and 5.82 respectively. That's way better than other units in the same category. The small Honda Element did very well with 4.31.

The worse products are the Chevy Aveo and Ford Escape with 3.02 and 2.77 respectively.

Does anybody know what are the results for Hummers and other very heavy SUVs?

fred schumacher

Smart is a Daimler, not VW product. Give credit to Daimler's Tridion safety cell concept. As cars become smaller, they will have to be better designed for safety, a serious concern of motorists.

Consumers tend to equate safety with size. They forget that rollovers cause a disproportionate percentage of traffic deaths, and larger, high center of gravity vehicles are more prone to roll overs.



I stand corrected. Of course, Smarts are from DB, not from VW.

Yes, SUVs with higher centre of gravity and proned to more roll-over should have stronger roofs.

The Element may be one the (good) exception.


Did you know that large SUVs (like the 10,300 lbs Hummer 1) do not have to meet any roof crush test or ratings at all.

According to my neighbour, a very heavy Hummer H1 roof crush rating rating could be about 1.0 to 1.5 and heavy weights such as the Ford 8900 lbs Excursion, the 8600 lbs Chevy Suburban and Hummer H2 and many other similar overweight vehicles could have roof crush ratings as low as 2.0.


Are there many deaths from collapsed roofs?

Trucks have all sorts of exemptions.

Here in AZ, it is legal to transport kids in the back of pickups. Yikes !
Even on freeways, as far as I know.

Special interests (rural).

Little day care "centers" rarely do - Oh my !

The comments to this entry are closed.