Satellite and GPS Measurements Show Ice Loss from Greenland Ice Sheet Spreading to Northwest Coast
24 March 2010
Ice loss from the Greenland ice sheet, which has been increasing during the past decade over its southern region, is now moving up its northwest coast, according to a new international study. The research indicates the ice-loss acceleration began moving up the northwest coast of Greenland staring in late 2005.
|The Greenland Ice Sheet|
|Greenland is about one-fourth the size of the United States and the massive ice sheet covers about 80% of its surface. It holds about 20% of the world’s ice, the equivalent of about 6.4 meters (21 feet) of global sea rise.|
|Air temperatures over the Greenland ice sheet have increased by about 2.2 °C (4 °F) since 1991, which most scientists attribute to a build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.|
|A 2006 study by Wahr and Velicogna using the GRACE satellite indicated that Greenland lost roughly 684 cubic kilometers (164 cubic miles) of ice from April 2004 to April 2006—more than the volume of water in Lake Erie.|
The team drew their conclusions by comparing data from NASA’s Gravity and Recovery Climate Experiment satellite system, or GRACE, with continuous GPS measurements made from long-term sites on bedrock on the edges of the ice sheet.
The data from the GPS and GRACE provided the researchers with monthly averages of crustal uplift caused by ice-mass loss. The team, which includes researchers from Denmark’s Technical Institute’s National Space Institute in Copenhagen and University of Colorado at Boulder, combined the uplift measured by GRACE over United Kingdom-sized chunks of Greenland, while the GPS receivers monitored crustal uplift on scales of just tens of miles.
“Our results show that the ice loss, which has been well documented over southern portions of Greenland, is now spreading up along the northwest coast,” says Shfaqat Abbas Khan, lead author on a paper that was published 19 March, in Geophysical Research Letters, a publication of the American Geophysical Union (AGU).
The team found that uplift rates near the Thule Air Base on Greenland’s northwest coast rose by about 4 centimeters, or roughly 1.5 inches, from October 2005 to August 2009. Although the low resolution of GRACE—a swath of about 250 kilometers, or 155 miles, across—is not precise enough to pinpoint the source of the ice loss, the fact that the ice sheet is losing mass nearer to the ice sheet margins suggests the flows of Greenland outlet glaciers there are increasing in velocity, said the study authors.
When we look at the monthly values from GRACE, the ice mass loss has been very dramatic along the northwest coast of Greenland. This is a phenomenon that was undocumented before this study. Our speculation is that some of the big glaciers in this region are sliding downhill faster and dumping more ice in the ocean.
—John Wahr, CU-Boulder physics professor and study co-author
|This animation depicts the spread of ice loss into northwest Greenland observed by GRACE from 2003 through 2009. The shift in the color spectrum beginning with turquoise and ending in black over the seven-year time span shows the decreasing mass of ice relative to 2003. Courtesy John Wahr, University of Colorado.|
Other co-authors on the new study are Michael Bevis and Eric Kendrick from Ohio State University, Columbus; and Isabella Velicogna of the University of California-Irvine, who also is a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.
A 2009 study by Velicogna, published also in Geophysical Research Letters, showed that between April 2002 and February 2009, the Greenland ice sheet shed roughly 1,605 cubic kilometers (385 cubic miles) of ice. The mass loss is equivalent to about 0.5 millimeters (0.02 inches) of global sea-level rise per year.
These changes on the Greenland ice sheet are happening fast, and we are definitely losing more ice mass than we had anticipated. We also are seeing this trend in Antarctica, a sign that warming temperatures really are having an effect on ice in Earth’s cold regions.
Researchers have been gathering data from GRACE since NASA launched the system in 2002. Two GRACE satellites circle Earth 16 times a day separated by 220 kilometers (137 miles) and measure changes in Earth’s gravity field caused by regional shifts in the planet’s mass, including ice sheets, oceans and water stored in the soil and in underground aquifers.
In addition to monitoring the Thule GPS receiver in northwest Greenland as part of the new study, the team also is taking data from GPS receivers in southern Greenland near the towns of Kellyville and Kulusuk. An additional 51 permanent GPS stations recently set up around the edges of the Greenland ice sheet should be useful to measure future up crustal uplift and corresponding ice loss, says Wahr.
If this activity in northwest Greenland continues and really accelerates some of the major glaciers in the area—like the Humboldt Glacier and the Peterman Glacier&mash;Greenland’s total ice loss could easily be increased by additional 50 to 100 cubic kilometers, (12 to 24 cubic miles) within a few years.
—Shfaqat Abbas Khan
The study was funded by NASA and the National Science Foundation.
Shfaqat Abbas Khan, John Wahr, Michael Bevis, Isabella Velicogna, Eric Kendrick (2010) Spread of ice mass loss into northwest Greenland observed by GRACE and GPS. Geophysical Research Letters doi: 10.1029/2010GL042460
Look at the plus-side: in a few decades Greenland will be green.
Posted by: dursun | 24 March 2010 at 09:40 AM
...South Florida and other low lands will be blue....
Posted by: HarveyD | 24 March 2010 at 12:57 PM
Somehow this just seems unimpressive.
Posted by: sulleny | 25 March 2010 at 04:00 PM
You mean the article that says "there is not anything inherently contradictory that extreme cold is replaced by higher temperatures than average. Or that melting sea ice occasionally is replaced by expanding ice sheets ... global warming hasn't been called off". Please a temporary weather blip used as an excuse by the denialist crowd yet again. Too bad the article doesn't agree with your sentiments S.
Or the fact that the article is talking sea ice which will be all melted and then some in 6 months and not glacial ice as this article.
Or all the GRACE data showing consistant ice mass lost.
I've see things haven't changed much during my hiatus. Same old misinformation being sold as .... when its really pure ....
Posted by: aym | 27 March 2010 at 04:24 PM