California ARB Begins Process to Revise Diesel Control Regulations
Burlington Hydro Takes Delivery of First EV in Commercial Fleet Application in Canada

National Research Council Study Finds CO2 Emissions Causing Ocean Acidification at Unprecedented Rate

The chemistry of the ocean is changing at an unprecedented rate and magnitude due to anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions; the rate of change exceeds any known to have occurred for at least for at least 800,000 years, concludes a congressionally requested study by the US National Research Council.

Unless anthropogenic CO2 emissions are substantially curbed, or atmospheric CO2 is controlled by some other means, the report finds, the average pH of the ocean will continue to fall. Ocean acidification has demonstrated impacts on many marine organisms. While the ultimate consequences are still unknown, there is a risk of ecosystem changes that threaten coral reefs, fisheries, protected species, and other natural resources of value to society.

The ocean absorbs a significant portion of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from human activities, equivalent to about one-third of the total emissions for the past 200 years from fossil fuel combustion, cement production and land use change, the report notes. While the uptake of CO2 by the ocean benefits society by moderating the rate of climate change, it also causes unprecedented changes to ocean chemistry, decreasing the pH of the water and leading to a suite of chemical changes collectively known as ocean acidification.

It is important to note that the concentration of atmospheric CO2 is rising too rapidly for natural, CaCO3-cycle processes to maintain the pH of the ocean. As a consequence, the average pH of the ocean will continue to decrease as the surface ocean absorbs more atmospheric CO2.

—Ocean Acidification

Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the average pH of ocean surface waters has decreased approximately 0.1 unit—from about 8.2 to 8.1—making them more acidic. Models project an additional 0.2 to 0.3 unit drop by the end of the century.

Studies on a number of marine organisms have shown that lowering seawater pH with CO2 affects biological processes, such as photosynthesis, nutrient acquisition, growth, reproduction, and individual survival depending upon the amount of acidification and the species tested. For example, some of the strongest evidence of the potential effects of ocean acidification on marine ecosystems comes from experiments on organisms with calcium carbonate shells and skeletons. The results showed decreases in shell and skeletal growth in a range of marine organisms, including reef-building corals, commercially important mollusks such as oysters and mussels, and several types of plankton at the base of marine food webs.

The ability of various marine organisms to acclimate or adapt to ocean acidification is unknown, but existing data suggest that there will be ecological winners and losers, leading to shifts in the composition and functioning of many marine ecosystems, the committee said. Such ecosystem changes could threaten coral reefs, fisheries, protected species, and other natural resources.

Although changes in ocean chemistry caused by increasing atmospheric CO2 can be determined, not enough information exists to assess the social or economic effects of ocean acidification, much less develop plans to mitigate or adapt to them, the committee noted.

The committee recommended six key elements of a successful National Ocean Acidification Program:

  • An integrated ocean acidification observation network that includes the development of new tools, methods, and techniques to improve measurements;
  • research in eight broad areas to fulfill critical information gaps;
  • assessments to identify stakeholder concerns and a process to provide relevant information for decision support;
  • a data management office that would ensure data quality, access, and archiving, plus an information exchange that would provide research results, syntheses, and assessments to managers, policymakers, and the general public;
  • facilities to support high-quality research and training of ocean acidification researchers; and
  • an effective 10-year strategic plan for the program that will identify key goals, set priorities, and allow for community input, in addition to a detailed implementation plan.

The study is funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NASA, the US Geological Survey, and the National Science Foundation. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies.

These are independent, nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and health policy advice under an 1863 congressional charter. Committee members, who serve pro bono as volunteers, are chosen by the Academies for each study based on their expertise and experience and must satisfy the Academies’ conflict-of-interest standards. The resulting consensus reports undergo external peer review before completion.




Being a simple soul I would of course see this rapid rate of acidification, directly correlated to increased CO2 emissions, and unprecedented in the last half a million years or so, as prima facie evidence that man's extravagant burning of fossil fuels is the cause.

It seems to me so much more likely than corrupt scientists manipulating the data to secure Wall St bankers lifestyles, or carelessly losing weather stations, or finding hockey sticks where there are none......

But no doubt there is an obvious explanation I have missed. Perhaps it's the fault of big government.

Will S

We are poisoning the future of our children, their children, etc.

Sanity Chk

Gee, what's happened to all the fossil mouth pieces? It seems only a week ago and forever before that when they would have beat everyone else to the punch commenting on a post like this.

Are they finally seeing the light? Has some Karmic repercussion hit them? Has their funding dried up?

On the one hand, I miss shaking my head their sarcastic, deceitful and obfuscatory diatribes. On the other, its a relief to imagine we might engage in some meaningful dialog on the subject postings.


Remember Dan Quayle's tantrum, in his debate with Al Gore, that Gore's book says that taxpayers will have to pay for wetlands restoration? It won't be long before republicans and democrats will have to tell us that taxpayers will have to pay more taxes for gasoline, oil, etc. in order to mitigate GW and OA. In the 90s I argued about GW and many said "The oceans can absorb the carbon." So now what do we have? Ruined atmosphere AND poisoned ocean.

There is plenty of solar energy. So if we raise the price of fossil fuel, solar and renewables will be the choice. But it will mean sacrificing football tickets, restaurant dinners, etc., in this country. What can people in China sacrifice in order to save the planet?

Chris O

Ah, the National Research Council...isn't that the same organization that reported last december "PHEVs and EVs To Cost Tens of Thousands More Than Gasoline Counterparts for Next 20 to 30 Years"? And here we are a few months later and Nissan has just priced it's Leaf at $32.700 and it turned out that the group that the National Research Council assigned to do the report on plug-in was non other than the Committee on the Assessment of Resource Needs for Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Technologies. Climate gate proved it already: even scientific reports have very little meaning in a world in which everybody has an agenda and everybody lies...



That's what peer review is about. To check the background and facts of papers.

So called climategate was and is a hack job designed to appeal to people through sensationalist methodologies. On review, there has been shown to be no scientific faud although there was problems with FOI requests with known denialists, who use the tactics to interfere with people trying to do their work.

Anyway, ocean acidification is being studied across many different places and none of it's good news.

The comments to this entry are closed.