Energy ministers agree to help speed up global deployment of carbon capture and storage
ALTe Powertrain Technologies and Manheim partner to retrofit ALTe range-extended electric powertrains in fleet vehicles

NASA awards $16.5M to four teams for additional research into reducing aircraft fuel consumption, emissions and noise

NASA is awarding $16.5 million to four industry and academic teams for additional research into ideas to reduce aircraft fuel consumption, emissions and noise in aircraft that could enter service between 2030 and 2035. NASA refers to this time period as N+3, representing technology three generations more advanced than what is in service today.

The teams first studied the ideas from October 2008 to April 2010. Under the new contracts, the teams will now develop concepts and models that can be tested in computer simulations, laboratories and wind tunnels.

The work is funded by NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate in Washington. The agency’s Fundamental Aeronautics Program is focused on developing technology that will enable aircraft to meet national goals for reduced fuel consumption, emissions and noise. The program’s Subsonic Fixed Wing Project oversees the work at the agency’s Glenn Research Center in Cleveland and Langley Research Center in Virginia.

The team leaders, projects, contract amounts and periods of performance are:

  • Boeing Research & Technology, Huntington Beach, Calif., Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research, or SUGAR, $8.8 million, three years

  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Mass., Aircraft and Technology Concepts for N+3 Subsonic Transport, $4.6 million, three years

  • Cessna Aircraft Company-Cessna Citation, Wichita, Kan., Star-C2 Protective Skins-Materials & Requirements Development, $1.9 million, 27 months

  • Northrop Grumman Systems Inc., El Segundo, Calif., High Lift Leading Edge Ground Test, $1.2 million, 14 months

Boeing. The Boeing Research & Technology (BR&T) award continues the work of the SUGAR (Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research) Project, which looked at truss-based wing aircraft designs and hybrid electric engine technology. The Boeing subsonic team, which includes BR&T, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, General Electric and Georgia Tech, looked at five concepts as part of the SUGAR (Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research) project. The concepts include two conventional reference configurations, similar in appearance to a 737 (nicknamed SUGAR Free and Refined SUGAR); two versions of a new design high span, strut-braced wing aircraft (referred to as SUGAR High and SUGAR Volt); and a hybrid wing body configuration (called SUGAR Ray).

In its earlier assessment, the team found that the SUGAR Volt concept (which adds an electric battery gas turbine hybrid propulsion system) can reduce fuel burn by greater than 70% and total energy use by 55% when battery energy is included. Moreover, the fuel burn reduction and the ‘greening’ of the electrical power grid can produce large reductions in emissions of life cycle CO2 and nitrous oxide. Hybrid electric propulsion also has the potential to shorten takeoff distance and reduce noise.

The SUGAR team’s report concluded that hybrid electric engine technology “is a clear winner, because it can potentially improve performance relative to all of the NASA goals.

The new contract will allow the team to start collecting higher fidelity data on its concepts. Under the contract, the team will design, construct and test wind tunnel mockups and computer models of the airplane. The team also will study lightweight materials and engine concepts for even more futuristic planes that could fly between 2040 and 2045.

MIT. The MIT team is moving forward with work on its “double bubble” airplane design. Its concept is a dual fuselage, two partial cylinders placed side by side, that would create a wider structure than the traditional tube-and-wing airliner. In the initial development of the design, the team also moved the engines from wing-mounted locations to the rear of the fuselage. Unlike the engines on most transport aircraft that take in the high-speed, undisturbed air flow, the D-series engines take in slower moving air that is present in the wake of the fuselage.

Known as the Boundary Layer Ingestion (BLI), this technique allows the engines to use less fuel for the same amount of thrust, although the design has several practical drawbacks, such as creating more engine stress.

Under the new contract, the team will develop the technologies identified during the first study and build a model for testing. MIT also will explore the challenges of high-efficiency, small-core engine technology—the idea that it is not necessary to increase an engine’s size to increase efficiency in delivering power.

Cessna. The Cessna Aircraft Company team will focus on airplane structure, particularly the aircraft outer covering. Engineers are trying to develop what some call a “magic skin” that can protect planes against lightning, electromagnetic interference, extreme temperatures and object impacts. The skin would heal itself if punctured or torn and help insulate the cabin from noise. The NASA funding will help the company develop, integrate and test the structural concept.

The skin will be made from a material called STAR-C2, which stands for “smoothing, thermal, absorbing, reflective, conductive, cosmetic”.

The Northrop Grumman team will test models of the leading edge of the wing. If engineers can design a smooth edge without the current standard slats, airplanes would be quieter and consume less fuel at cruise altitudes because of the smoother flow of air over the wings.

Comments

HarveyD

Here again, why private enterprises in this field did not do their home work, designed and built more efficient engine and airplanes in the last 50 years? Why wait for public $$$M to do it?

Mannstein

The expense of cerification for new engines and airframes is not insignificant.

Henry Gibson

Turboprop airplanes are more efficient already than fanjet engines. What is the most efficient design of a turbine or prop to get the desired thrust? Can electric wheel motors save on energy on take off as they can during taxi runs to the runway and back. They also can do some braking without overheating the tire. Are electric driven propellers efficient enough will the be more reliable. How about two generating turbines and four propellers for reliability and economy.

Most European flights and most US ones are short enough for turboprops or their electric hybrid equivalent.

Since the ZEBRA battery and its newer version, Durathon, are as light as most lithium batteries and can be made even lighter than they are now, there could be some aircraft use. They could be depleted just before landing and then recharged from the propellers motors acting as generators whilst supplying braking thrust along with the wheel motors. The battery energy is then used for the taxi runs. ..HG..

HarveyD

Good ideas HG but batteries energy density need to be one order of magnitude better to reduce weight to an acceptable level. It may not come for another 20+ years or so. Meanwhile better turbo-prop engines, lighter airframes, lighter on-board equipment and better overall design could reduce fuel consumption by 50+%. Oil at $200+/barrel would help.

Stan Peterson

Harvey D,

You have a very warped idea of the how Progress is made. Who said that private industry hasn't improved aircraft? We aren't still flying Wright Flyers are we?

Government funding is the most inefficient and useless investment vehicle that can be imagined. Funds flow to the politically connected, and NOT to the best ideas...

Meanwhile lots of money is diverted to extracting Taxes, to maintiaining the political relationships, and to governmental administrative costs that dwarf, the actual money spent on R&D. If your model was so true and accurate, then the Soviet Union would still be alive, its industries and products the envy of the World, for efficiency and modernity.

Your ideas are as dead as the totalitarian, bolshevik formula for political economy.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)