Report for IPCC finds renewables could supply up to 77% of global energy by 2050 under most optimistic scenario; need for enabling public policies and investments
Duke study finds methane levels 17x higher in water wells near hydrofracking sites

Natural gas option available for Freightliner 114 severe duty trucks

Freightliner Trucks announced that its new 114 Severe Duty (SD) set-back axle (SBA) truck will be available with natural gas technology. Designed for severe duty segments such as construction and other markets, the new 114SD SBA is a lightweight yet durable truck targeted at heavy-duty vocational applications.

The 114SD SBA natural gas truck expands Freightliner’s alternative fuel product offerings. The company already offers the industry’s only turn-key conventional chassis natural gas solutions, and along with units sold under the Sterling brand, will have more than 1,000 trucks in customer hands by the end of 2011.

Designed for vocational and municipal customers such as dump, refuse and sewer vacs, the factory-built 114SD SBA natural gas truck will include the lightweight Cummins ISLG natural gas engine. The truck will also be equipped with the Allison 3000RDS transmission, which includes patented torque converter technology that results in improved startability at the launch of the vehicle, full power shifts, and a better performing engine.

Natural gas is quickly becoming the fuel of choice for the refuse market, and has started to gain traction with municipal customers. Based on our conversations with customers in other vocational segments, there’s an increased interest in natural gas, particularly with the recent spike in the price of diesel fuel.

—TJ Reed, director of product marketing for Freightliner Trucks

Production will begin on the natural gas 114SD SBA in December 2011.

Comments

Nick Lyons

Simple economics are going to drive widespread adoption of natural gas fuel for fleet applications.

SJC

This is what Pickens is advocating, but after 3 years of pushing he has made VERY little progress. It makes sense and we should do it, which is precisely why Congress will not. The GOP is in the pockets of big oil.

ejj

"The GOP is in the pockets of big oil." Don't forget Obama & all his campaign contributions from BP, as well as generous fast-track of Petrobras drilling permit in the Gulf of Mexico & promise to buy oil from them. In other words, it REALLY isn't going to happen.

ejj


Obama biggest recipient of BP cash
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/36783.html

SJC

It is up to Congress to make the laws and the GOP Congress from 2003-2006 set the ridiculously low $75 million liability cap. It was the Bush MMS that partied with the oil people and looked the other way while the oil companies cut corners in the Gulf. It was the GOP law that exempted the natural gas drillers from the EPA in 2005 and allowed them to fracture with no liability. It is the Bush administration that allowed coal companies to blow off mountain tops and dump the rubble in the rivers.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)