ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. expanding cleanup operations in Yellowstone River
04 July 2011
|
ExxonMobil Pipeline Silvertip system. The break reportedly occurred about 10 miles west of Billings. Click to enlarge. |
ExxonMobil Pipeline Company (EMPC) said it is expanding its clean up operation following a release of an estimated 750–1,000 barrels of crude oil into the Yellowstone River in Montana from the company’s Silvertip pipeline. (Earlier post.)
EMPC said no cause has been identified for the release of oil from the 12-inch pipeline, which it said met all regulatory requirements and has undergone inspection most recently in December. A field audit of the pipeline’s integrity management program was undertaken by US Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) in June. DOT had last year issued a warning letter to ExxonMobil citing seven safety violations along the pipeline.
|
Screen shot from the National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Public Map Viewer shows the Silvertip pipeline crossing the Yellowstone River on its way to Billings. Click to enlarge. |
The AP reported that EMPC and government officials speculated that high waters in recent weeks may have scoured the river bottom and exposed the pipeline—which is buried—to debris that could have damaged the pipe. Eastern Montana received record rainfall in the last month and also has a huge snowpack in the mountains that is melting, resulting in widespread flooding.
Pipeline pumps were shut down within seven minutes of a pressure loss and action to isolate the pipeline was immediately initiated. Air quality monitoring throughout the impacted area is ongoing and has confirmed no danger to public health, according to EMPC. Municipal water systems are being notified to monitor water quality but no reports of impacts have been received to date.
Montana refining |
---|
There are four operating petroleum refineries in Montana, according to the US Energy Information Administration, with a combined capacity of 187,600 barrels per calendar day. |
The Montana Refining Company in Great Falls has invested approximately $100 million in upgrades since 2006 and has 10,000 barrel per day capacity. |
The CHS Refinery in Laurel underwent a $400-million upgrade in May of 2008 and completed a $50 million benzene process upgrade in the fall of 2010. 59,600 barrels per day. |
ExxonMobil has invested approximately $90 million in upgrades to its refinery since 2005. 60,000 barrels per day |
The ConocoPhillips refinery in Billings has spent $500 million in upgrades since November 2006 and has plans to invest an additional $500 million in future improvements. 58,000 barrels per day. |
ExxonMobil Pipeline operates the Silvertip crude pipeline. This system originates at the Wyoming - Montana border. Receipt points include Cenex Front Range Pipeline, Conoco Glacier Pipeline, Marathon Pipeline, and Express Pipeline at Edgar Station, Montana. Deliveries are to Cenex at Laurel, Montana, and ExxonMobil at Billings, Montana. |
ExxonMobil Pipeline operates distribution terminals in Montana at Billings, Bozeman and Helena and Spokane, Washington. These terminals are supplied by Yellowstone Pipeline, a JV between ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil. |
The pipeline burst about 10 miles west of Billings near Laurel, where it crosses underneath the Yellowstone River, according to the company. EMPC said oil has been found as far as five miles down the river from the pipeline location and additional reports of oil sightings are being investigated. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said its staff had spotted oil at least 40 miles downstream, and other reports said oil was as far as 100 miles away.
More than 120 people were involved in the response and cleanup effort including ExxonMobil’s North America Regional Response Team, the Clean Harbors oil spill response organization, and additional contractors. An additional 80 people are expected on site Monday.
For the purposes of the response, the area downriver of the spill has been organized into four zones. Cleanup activities are focused in the first two zones, Laurel to Duck Creek Bridge, a distance of seven miles from the spill location; and Duck Creek Bridge to Johnson Lane (12 miles). Reconnaissance and evaluation activities are under way in the second two zones, Johnson Lane to Miles City (144 miles) and Miles City to Glendive (78 miles).
Cleanup crews are using absorbent pads to soak up oil, boom to isolate oil that has pooled adjacent to the river and vacuum trucks and tankers to pick up and dispose of the oil.
Air quality monitoring is ongoing and has confirmed no danger to public health, according to EMPC. Municipal water systems are being notified to monitor water quality but no reports of impacts have been received to date.
Daily aerial flights over the river are being undertaken to locate additional oil locations and monitor and direct cleanup activity. Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, among others, is calling for use of boats on the river for closer inspection.
More than 70 calls to the community claims line have been received. A claims hotline number (1-888-382-0043) was established to assist individuals who might have been impacted by this event.
Workers from the International Bird Rescue are expected to arrive on Monday. The Montana Audubon Conservation Education Center and Yellowstone Valley Audubon have offered to provide wildlife recovery services and facilities. One report of impacted wildlife has been received.
Contacts with senior government officials were made throughout the day. ExxonMobil is coordinating the response with the Environmental Protection Agency; the Montana Department of Environmental Quality; US Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration; Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks; Yellowstone County Disaster and Emergency Services; and Yellowstone County commissioners.
An investigation team has been established to determine the cause of the release.
A number of residents in nearby Laurel were temporarily evacuated from their homes early Saturday as a precaution but were able to return later that morning.
This disaster should never have happened in the first place. Good design and regular inspections would have prevented this all together.
Posted by: SJC | 04 July 2011 at 09:31 AM
I agree. But the silver lining is that while its going to get cleaned up eventually, a lot of cleanup personnel are going to be circulating cash in the local economy & with a major cleanup bill going to ExxonMobil, and workers getting plenty of overtime hours. Government will collect its tax revenue & local businesses will get an injection of cash --- gas, food, lodging, bars, strip clubs, etc.
Posted by: ejj | 04 July 2011 at 01:41 PM
This is minor and nothing compared to an oil tank truck (or load of H2, or PV panels) wiping out a family.
And sheet happens.
BUT
Since these things are (properly) viewed as something the oil companies just might consider a cost of doing business it might properly be viewed similarly to hate crimes.
Make the penalty 2 or more times the total damage.
Total claims are 10M$, make the fine $20M over and above that.
Why?
Because people are sensitized to these things, we now consider the environment second only to people (or sometimes ahead of)
And - the people ARE what counts.
Posted by: ToppaTom | 04 July 2011 at 06:51 PM
I see no silver lining here, there are productive ways of moving an economy that is a far better use of money. One of those better uses is to have better design requirements and regular inspections, so this never occurs in the first place.
Posted by: SJC | 04 July 2011 at 09:57 PM
SJC...that is not how they maximize their profits.
Posted by: HarveyD | 05 July 2011 at 08:41 AM
Yes I know, that is why we have laws and enforcement.
Posted by: SJC | 05 July 2011 at 08:47 AM
They're not going to maximize profits with steep cleanup bills & fines...BUT they have been making tens of billions of dollars every quarter in recently & during the Bush gas price spike, so even what would be considered expensive cleanup & fines may be relatively insignificant given the overall corporate balance sheet.
Posted by: ejj | 05 July 2011 at 03:02 PM
How can you make nuclear plants, coal fired power plants, pipeline operators, deep sea oil diggers, tar sands operators, and all other potentially polluting operations, responsible for their acts?
Contributions (by all potential polluters) to a huge clean up fund may work?
Posted by: HarveyD | 05 July 2011 at 04:25 PM
Bush told the superfund polluters not to pay into the fund for 8 years. The contributions they make are to parties, candidates and PACs. There is a better return on investment there.
Posted by: SJC | 05 July 2011 at 04:58 PM
I think these claims for the many things Bush was able to accomplish originate from the extreme right, cleverly scripted to illuminate the inability of Obama to do anything; to counter the bad accomplishments or match the good ones.
Unless campaign speaches are considered "good ones".
Posted by: ToppaTom | 06 July 2011 at 01:02 PM
I think Obama has done a spectacular job radically increasing the use of unmanned drones in the war on terror & also getting Osama Bin Laden.
"Bush told the superfund polluters not to pay into the fund for 8 years" --- either SJC is lying or the GAO is lying. I trust the GAO more the SJC. See figure 2 on page 7 of the report - there was an overall increase in Superfund fines, penalties and recoveries during the 8 years of GW's presidency, as well as an overall increase in Superfund funding. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08841r.pdf
Posted by: ejj | 06 July 2011 at 05:05 PM
ejj should know better than to resort to the use of facts.
I think Obama has done well by expanding the Bush strategy in the use of unmanned drones to kill terrorists and bystanders, raining cruise missile death on Tripoy and allowing the SEALS to execute Osama Bin Laden in his home (instead of bringing him back to NYC for trial), while prosecuting other SEALS for maybe punching or beating (can you believe it) a suspected terrorist.
Now, once he remembers and executes those at Guantanamo, he will be proud to be an American.
As a hawk, he ALREADY stands head and sholders above all other Nobel P.P. winners.
Posted by: ToppaTom | 06 July 2011 at 05:51 PM
Fact of the matter is not only was Superfund FULLY funded under Bush, funding actually INCREASED - general fund appropriations increased, and penalties/fines/recoveries (FROM THE POLLUTERS) increased. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08841r.pdf
Posted by: ejj | 07 July 2011 at 04:55 AM
"EMPC said no cause has been identified for the release of oil from the 12-inch pipeline, which it said met all regulatory requirements "
"EMPC said oil has been found as far as five miles down the river from the pipeline location"
Liars. Where the pipeline goes under the river it was buried at a fifth the depth that regulations require (5ft vs 25ft) and the river was in flood at the time of the spill and they don't know the cause?. And the river was flowing at a rate of 7MPH. Oil floats on water right? They can do the math and know how far oil will be found down the river from the pipeline location in the day or two they took to respond.
Posted by: ai_vin | 07 July 2011 at 07:50 AM
Washington, D.C. — The New York Times has reported that through a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) report, the Bush administration has cut the funds necessary to clean up 33 toxic waste sites in 18 states under the Superfund program.
http://waste360.com/news/waste_bush_cuts_superfund
Posted by: SJC | 15 July 2011 at 05:45 AM
Doesn't the spinning, smearing, and headline cherry-picking ever get old SJC?
Posted by: ejj | 15 July 2011 at 02:05 PM