Nikkei: higher auto output raises fears about parts shortages
General Motors launches Buick LaCrosse eAssist in China

Nielsen global survey finds concerns about climate change slipping behind concerns over other environmental issues; air and water pollution top worries, pesticide use #3

Nielsen2
Other environmental concerns have pushed ahead of climate change on a global average basis. Source: Nielsen. Click to enlarge.

Concern about climate change/global warming among online consumers around the world took a back-seat to other environmental issues such as air and water pollution, water shortages, packaging waste and use of pesticides, according to Nielsen’s 2011 Global Online Environment & Sustainability Survey of more than 25,000 Internet respondents in 51 countries.

The latest findings, which were compared to 2007 and 2009 results, show that while 69% of global online consumers say they are concerned about climate change/global warming (up from 66% in 2009, but down from 72% in 2007), concern for other environmental issues are taking a higher priority in the minds of consumers and are rising with greater intensity.

Three out of four global consumers rated air pollution (77%) and water pollution (75%) as top concerns, both increasing six percentage points compared to 2009. But the areas where concern is mounting fastest among 73% of global online consumers is worry over the use of pesticides, packaging waste and water shortages, with reported concern increasing 16, 14 and 13 percentage points, respectively.

There are many possible reasons for declines in concern about climate change/global warming. Focus on immediate worries such as job security, local school quality, crime and economic well-being have all diminished media attention for climate stories in the past two years. In the face of other pressing concerns, a public ‘caring capacity’ for climate change has been tested. Without continued attention paid to global warming/climate change in the media, such concerns may have faded from the collective public conscience.

—Dr. Maxwell T. Boykoff, Senior Visiting Research Associate, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford

Top environmental concerns among Asia Pacific consumers include water shortages and air pollution, while water pollution was the main concern for Latin Americans, Middle Eastern/Africans, Europeans and North Americans.

Nielsen1
Climate change/global warming concerns falling in US, uneven in China, and rising in India. Source: Nielsen. Click to enlarge.

The USA recorded one of the steepest declines in concern about climate change/global warming among global markets over the four-year period from 2007 to 2011, dropping 14 percentage points. Today, less than half of Americans (48%) say they are concerned about climate change, which contrasts sharply with reported concern across the regions of the world: Latin America (90%), Middle East/Africa (80%), Asia Pacific (72%), and Europe (68%). Among the 21% of Americans who are decidedly not concerned, 63% indicated they believe natural variation—and not people—causes climate change/global warming.

During this period, Nielsen’s Global Online Consumer Confidence Survey found heightened American consumer concern around the economy, rising gas prices, and debt. With financial concerns still on the minds of many Americans, they’re indicating less and less concern about climate change and other environmental issues.

—Todd Hale, SVP Consumer & Shopper Insights, Nielsen US

In China, concern about climate change/global warming dropped 17% in the last two years from 77 percent in 2009 to 64% in 2011. Fully 86% of Indians are concerned about climate change, an increase of one percentage point compared to 2009.

The study found that there are a number of consumers who are either indifferent or not concerned about this issue. One-in-five global online consumers say they are neither concerned nor unconcerned about climate change/global warming and one-in-ten are not concerned at all. While half (48%) of unconcerned global online consumers cite “more urgent and serious matters in the world today” as the main reason for climate change apathy, 37% believe that climate change is not the result of human behavior and 23% believe future technologies will solve the problem.

Globally, Latin Americans remain the most concerned about climate change/global warming, at 90% up from 85% in 2009, while Middle East/Africa consumers posted the highest increase regionally as concern grew from 69 to 80% in the two year span.

Latin America has experienced a number of distressing and impactful environmental events over the last several years, and the region’s consumers are increasingly attributing these events to broad climate change. People are expressing clear concern about unusual weather patterns including increased rainfall, hurricanes, and floods in some parts of Latin America, and severe droughts in others.

—Arturo García, President, Nielsen Latin America

As for the sharp rise in concern in the Middle East/Africa:

The hot and dry climates in many Middle Eastern and African countries and the widely held perception that temperatures are rising every summer has likely led to an increased concern about climate change and weather variation.

—Ram Mohan Rao, Managing Director, Nielsen Egypt

Climate change/global warming concern increased 10 points in Europe to 68% , fell three points in Asia Pacific to 72% , and North America was the least concerned region with a two point decline to 50%. Global increase for climate change concern was driven largely by Middle East/Africa markets where awareness rose significantly in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Israel, and remained high in South Africa.

Thailand, Mexico, and Portugal were the world’s most concerned countries about climate change, with 93% of respondents from each market indicating concern. Portugal and Mexico were also the world’s most concerned countries about water shortages and air and water pollution.

In Portugal, severe weather patterns of extreme and uncharacteristic heat waves in the summer and snow in the winter over the past few years have heightened consumer concern and awareness over global warming and climate change issues, said Luís Bio, Marketing Director, Nielsen Portugal. In Mexico, as in the rest of Latin America, the media has been an influential force in raising awareness about the environment, with extensive coverage of environmental issues, said Paola Fonseca, Strategy and Innovation VP, Nielsen Latin America, who also noted that, having recognized vast consumer concern, manufacturers, retailers and service companies are increasingly implementing environmentally-friendly social responsibility programs.

Overall, 83% of global online consumers say that it is important that companies implement programs to improve the environment, but only 22% say they will pay more for an eco-friendly product. Willingness to pay extra for environmentally-friendly goods is highest in the Middle East/Africa, where one-third of consumers are willing and lowest in North America, where only 12% of both Canadians and Americans say they will pay extra for eco-friendly products. Many consumers reported a personal preference for eco-friendly goods, but large percentages of respondents report setting aside this preference and buying whichever product is cheapest, including 48% in North America, 36% in Middle East/Africa, 35% in Europe, 33% in Asia Pacific, and 27% in Latin America.

Nielsen3
Unwillingness to pay more for eco-friendly product. Source: Nielsen. Click to enlarge.

Global consumers have mixed feelings about the environmental impact and benefits of particular sustainable practices. While 64% of consumers, globally, indicated they believe organic products are good for the environment, there is wide regional disparity of opinion. Eighty percent of Latin Americans and 72% of Asia Pacific respondents think organic products are environmentally-friendly, but fewer people are convinced in Europe (58%), Middle East/Africa (57%), and North America (49%).

Among other environmental and sustainability efforts manufacturers have taken, recycled packaging and energy efficient products are seen as the most broadly helpful. Fully 83% believe that manufacturers using recycled packaging and producing energy efficient products and appliances have a positive impact on the environment. Fewer consumers are convinced of the positive environmental impact of local products (59%), fair trade products (51%) and products not tested on animals (44%). Belief in the positive impact of “local” products is highest in North America, where 65% of consumers reported believing local goods have a positive impact on the environment.

The Nielsen Global Online Environmental Survey was conducted between 23 March and 12 April 2011 and polled more than 25,000 consumers in 51 countries throughout Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and North America. The sample has quotas based on age and sex for each country based on their Internet users, and is weighted to be representative of Internet consumers and has a maximum margin of error of ±0.6%. This Nielsen survey is based on the behavior of respondents with online access only. Internet penetration rates vary by country. Nielsen uses a minimum reporting standard of 60% Internet penetration or 10M online population for survey inclusion. The Nielsen Global Online Survey, which includes the Global Online Consumer Confidence Survey, was established in 2005.

Comments

Zhukova

Here's a very informative presentation about the effects of immigration policy on population growth in USA -https://www.numbersusa.com/content/resources/video/educational/immigration-numbers-charts.html

450 B would be a trick,but 450 million is also a disaster. In his presentation, Roy Beck mentions Earth Day. This happened when i started engineering studies. People like me were excited about the current policy of population stabilization, sustainable society, and the average person knew we were trashing the planet because of excessive population. We became inspired by the optimism of energy conservation and environmentalism. However, at the same time, because I was an engineer, several of my friends blamed engineers like me for creating technologies that are ruining the planet.

"The Population Bomb". "Silent spring", "1984" and other books created social cultures that pitted environmentalists against capitalists. The capitalists are winning in spite of the global warming, the greatest mass extinction in history, ocean acidification, etc. They want increased population to make and purchase their products. They do this without any inherent responsiblity to protect society or the environment. Immigration supplies the increase in population that they require.

How will we tap into resources on other planets when we can't even keep people on a low earth orbit space station? Birth rates are important, but a one-child policy is impractial when the religious right is so powerful. Americans cry all the time for the government to "stay out of our bedroom", but the child tax credit is exactly the government in the bedroom. But, to eliminate that is very unlikely. It would be much easier to eliminate the "birthright citizenship", which the author of the 14th amendment, Jacob Howard, said he was against. Lowering legal immigration to sustainable levels would have a very big impact. If capitalists win, we will all be riding bicycles like Ron Paul, no fish left in the ocean, continued habitat loss, and global warming, all for their bogus right to make a profit.

Roger Pham

@Zhukova,
I share your notion that uncontrolled population growth will damage the environment and will lead to a lot of misery in the future, if not already now, in many parts of the world.

High rates of immigration to any country should also be restrained, because that will dilute the original culture of the host country and lead to social unrest. Witness what just happened in Norway. Immigrants are generally more materialistic and less loyal to the host country in comparison to those who have roots there. I witness that immigrants tend to buy more import cars than Americans with roots here.

Selective legal immigration and selective birth control is the key here. I don't think that the religious right oppose birth control. As for the One-Child Welfare policy, the religious right are welcomed to support the second baby born to a welfare family. I am personally against abortion, and for that reason, I promote birth control and adoption as alternatives.

You are absolutely right about unregulated capitalism, even though free-market mechanism and capitalism offer the best way to achieve efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Unchecked capitalism was what lead to exploitation of the poor masses of people, leading to the communist revolution. Sadly, communism,too, proved to be disastrous.

This is why I have been proposing the Green Economic Principle as the direction for future economic growth and prosperity and stable employment. Democratic, Capitalistic and Free Market principles in an ecologically, economically, and socially sustainable way. To avoid Red from taking over, we must go Green.

D

I could tell that we’re on the same interest and obsession. Good to know someone I could share my ideas. Looking forward to know and learn some more from you. I'll be glad to share my own thoughts to you soon. Thank you for sharing such valuable articles. More power!
Replica Hermes Birkin

Tom Watson

All anybody has to do to find local recyclers at Earth911 is type in whatever you want to recycle, plus your address, and a list of recyclers that are closest to you will appear. View website here

The comments to this entry are closed.