Snapshot of the California Zero Emission Vehicle program credit balances
Cobalt Technologies and Rhodia jointly to develop bagasse-based bio n-butanol market in Latin America

Volvo Car led CO2 reductions among European automakers in 2010 due partly to diesel success

2010 Fleet-average weight and fleet-average CO2 emissions by carmaker, compared with EU target line. Source: T&E. Click to enlarge.

The sixth annual analysis conducted by T&E, the European Federation for Transport and Environment, of new car CO2 emissions in Europe (2011 Cars & CO2 Report: How clean are Europe’s cars) found that Volvo Car Corporation led the pack with a CO2 reduction of 9%. Europe’s eight largest carmakers cut their CO2 emissions by an average of 2% to 6% in 2010. Mazda and Honda were both negative outliers, with small increases in emissions.

Overall, carbon dioxide emissions from new cars sold in the EU dropped by 3.7% in 2010, and today the average figure for new cars sold in Europe is 140 grams per kilometer. The analysis found that the top four in terms of fleet-average CO2 emissions remained unchanged. Fiat leads with 126 g/km, followed by Toyota, PSA and Renault. Daimler remains last on the list, having reduced CO2 in 2010 by a below-average 3%.

The current European regulation on cars and CO2 strives to achieve a 130 g/km average figure by 2015. Automaker targets for 2015 are differentiated on the basis of the weight of the vehicles they produce in 2015 compared with the average weight of the vehicles the entire industry will produce over the 2011-13 period.

Toyota is again closest to hitting its regulatory CO2 target, T&E found; the company is virtually there, five years ahead of time. PSA and Fiat are very close too with 3 and 5% cuts left to make respectively. Daimler is still furthest away with a 15% gap yet to close. Volvo is ranked tenth by this criteria, with an 8% gap.

The headline conclusion of last year’s report therefore remains unchanged: all available evidence points towards carmakers in Europe heading for very significant ‘over-compliance’ with the CO2 regulation and are hence likely to hit the 130 g/km CO2 target for 2015 several years in advance.

—2011 Cars & CO2 Report

Volvo said its 2010 results derived from a concerted focus under the “DRIVe towards zero” banner; sales of fuel-efficient diesel engines from the DRIVe range have been highly successful and are one of the explanations behind the major reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.

Examples of popular models are the V50 DRIVe with emissions of 99 gram/km and the V70 DRIVe with 119 gram/km. The Volvo Car Corporation’s CO2 strategy also includes electrified cars with varying degrees of hybridization, more efficient diesel and gasoline engines, and alternative fuels.

The aim is to come down to an average of 95 grams of carbon dioxide per kilometer across our total car sales in 2020. In theory that is entirely feasible, but a lot depends on developments in legislation, incentives, energy availability and of course customer demand. In addition, the EU intends to introduce a new method for calculating carbon dioxide, and this too will impact our plan.

—Peter Mertens, Senior Vice President Research and Development at the Volvo Car Corporation

In the report, T&E notes it has always opposed linking CO2 standards to vehicle weight, arguing that it takes away important incentives for vehicle lightweighting. Research commissioned by T&E found that basing CO2 standards on the car’s footprint—i.e., like the approach being taken in the US—is likely to allow cheaper and deeper CO2 reductions, and likely to lead to safer vehicles than weight based standards.

According to T&E, based on the analysis of the 2010 data, a change towards ‘footprint’-based standards would hardly change the relative positions of carmakers towards their regulatory targets. For most, in particular the volume carmakers like Volkswagen Group, PSA, GM, Toyota and Hyundai, the change would be in the 0-1% range. Volvo would also end up ranked 10th under this scheme, with an 11% gap to close by 2015.

Comparison of distance to 2015 targets for a weight-based versus a footprint-based set of CO2 standards. Source: T&E. Click to enlarge.




What a useless study!

Who cares what the CO2 emissions are, when the real toxic killers are almost unregulated in Europe?

What were the SOx releases?
What were the NOx releases?
What were the CO releases?
What were the PM10 releases?
What were the PM2.5 releases?

All these will kill you. CO2 is a harmless trace gas and a necessary plant food. Anyone's breath contains up to 44,000 ppm CO2.

In fairness, Europe is one of the places in the World where Man does put CO2 on net, into the atmosphere, so they should be mildly concerned with it, but only AFTER the real killers are in control. In Europe they most definitely are not being controlled as they should. But then the government dweebs can't tax any of the killer toxics, while taxing CO2 makes them appear to be heroes, due to their propaganda.


While it's good to lead in reductions let's not forget where the starting point is. Volvo reduced their g/km emissions by 9% but that still had them at 156.8 in 2010. Fiat was unchanged but they started out at a very low 126. All this means is Volvo had more low hanging fruit to pick


Europe is making huge strides in CO2 reduction and fuel efficiency.
Euro 6 will reduce the NOx and particulates further.
The main purpose [IMHO] is to get the European car fleet ready for really expensive fuel which will happen sooner or later. In the mean time, the EU states get to raise loads of tax from hydrocarbon fuel.
If a large trading block makes a clear statement as to which direction the motor industry should go, it can do it, and this is what we are seeing now.
Europe and Japan have chosen different routes to fuel efficiency (diesel vs. hybridisation) combined with lightweighting, aerodynamics Etc. Etc.
All the US has to do is pick and chose the bits that suit them.
As all the major US car companies already manufacture in Europe, this should be easy.


EURO V regulates Co, NOX, Particulates, Total HC,Non-Methane HC. SOX is regulated under a different standard around industrial, shipping and power due to more emissions from that than transport.
EURO VI will be tighter yet.
I doubt anyone can emit the same volume of Co2 in a lifetime as that of an average car in a year. Nothing is harmless in over abundance. Not even peanut butter.
What propaganda are you listening to EX?

The comments to this entry are closed.