Porous germanium oxide anode material for Li-ion batteries shows high capacity and long cycling life
17 December 2011
|
GeOx anode performance in half cells. Credit: ACS, Wang et al. Click to enlarge. |
Researchers have developed a nanostructure of amorphous hierarchical porous germanium oxide (GeOx)—with primary particle diameter of 3.7 nm—that has a very stable capacity of 1250 mAh g–1 for 600 cycles.
They also built full cells using a Li(NiCoMn)⅓O2 (NCM) cathode with the GeOx anodes. A full cell exhibited a discharge capacity of 164 mAh (g of NCM)−1 at a constant current/constant voltage (CCCV) rate of C/20 [based on Li(NiCoMn)⅓O2] between 2.5 and 4.2 V, with an initial 85% Coulombic efficiency. The cell realized a capacity of 144 mAh (g of NCM)−1 at the following C/2 rate. Cycling was stable, with an average loss over 200 cycles of only 0.028% per cycle.
While there is great interest in developing novel anode materials for high-performance Li-ion batteries for electric vehicles (EVs), the researchers note in a paper published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society, all of the high-capacity anode materials such as silicon, germanium, and tin suffer from the major problem of poor capacity retention, which prevents them from being used in large commercial applications.
The intake and removal of Lithium ions causes anode volume changes and stresses, resulting in particle cracking and pulverization, resulting in irreversibility. The volume change can also cause disconnections between the active materials and the current collector, interrupting the charge-transportation pathway. All this translates into a loss in capacity and failure of the battery.
The authors noted that different approaches to solving the problem have included:
- Tolerance enhancement;
- Accommodation;
- Buffering (which may involve making composites with carbon and/or inactive components, carbon coating, alloying, thin filming, and modifying binders and the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer coating); and
- Limitation, such as narrowing the voltage window and fixing the lithiation level.
Tailored nanostructures are showing some good stability in other work, the authors note. These nanostructures generally are grouped into two classes: carbon composites and thin films.
However, both classes have several disadvantages. In carbon composites (in which the added carbon constituted over half the weight of the composites in some cases), the following drawbacks were evident: (i) the presence of low-capacity carbon suppresses the overall energy density; (ii) the synthesis usually involves multiple complicated steps; (iii) the intact surface coating decreases the electrode’s kinetics; and (iv) carbon affords only limited accommodation, so the composites either must be porous to provide preformed voids or require inactive oxides to buffer the volume change, which magnifies the effects of the other three disadvantages. On the other hand, thin films are suitable only for microbatteries, and their performance must be stabilized via thick inactive substrates.
Therefore, searching for an inexpensive, high-performance material without a carbon coating has always been greatly attractive but very challenging. Here we present a simple, cheap, and easily scaled-up synthetic procedure for making GeOx powders with a high capacity of ∼1250 mAh g−1 for 600 cycles when used as anodes. Interestingly, the resulting nanostructure exhibits features of hierarchical porous agglomerates, is amorphous, and contains ∼3.7 nm primary particles that afford us an ideal model system for studying the mechanism whereby this nanostructure exhibits extended cycling in the absence of extra carbon compositing or confinement from substrates.
—Wang et al.
The team attributed the performance of the GeOx material to the synergy of its four characteristics: small primary particles; porous structure; amorphous state; and the incorporation of oxygen. They suggested that the small size of primary particles might play a crucial role for the following reasons:
Avoidance of the widespread problem of pulverization of high-capacity anode materials. Other work had reported that micrometer-sized Ge particles used as anodes in Li-ion batteries were broken into 5−15 nm particles after some cycles. Because the size of the primary particles in their samples is already only ∼3.7 nm, “it is hard to envision their further reduction”, the team said.
Small per-particle absolute volume change—good for preserving electrical contact as well as the particle’s integrity.
Small particle size facilitates the charge transfer (both ionic and electronic) over shorter distances, and having more surfaces for transfer enhances the reactivity.
The small primary particle thus is the basis for efficiently maintaining the hierarchical porous structure’s stability and integrity upon high-capacity cycling. Growing the particles to 20 nm resulted in lower capacities but still good stability at this level of lithiation (cf. the 300 °C sample). Besides the very small particles, the amorphous structure is another important factor directly related to a stable capacity.
—Wang et al.
Resources
Xiao-Liang Wang, Wei-Qiang Han, Haiyan Chen, Jianming Bai, Trevor A. Tyson, Xi-Qian Yu, Xiao-Jian Wang, and Xiao-Qing Yang (2011) Amorphous Hierarchical Porous GeOx as High-Capacity Anodes for Li Ion Batteries with Very Long Cycling Life. Journal of the American Chemical Society doi: 10.1021/ja208880f
These guys appear to be far behind the innovation happening at Northwestern University:
http://www.extremetech.com/computing/105343-graphene-improves-lithium-ion-battery-capacity-and-recharge-rate-by-10x
http://gov.aol.com/2011/11/22/engineering-team-finds-way-to-increase-lithium-battery-life-ten/
Magnitude better performance than germanium.
Posted by: Reel$$ | 18 December 2011 at 09:31 AM
Reel
And you are surely qualified to decide if graphene is better then germanium for that matter...
Posted by: Treehugger | 18 December 2011 at 03:58 PM
Tree, Northwestern claims 30,000mAh with their graphene anode compared to 1250mAh for this chemistry. It's a numbers game - they say.
Posted by: Reel$$ | 18 December 2011 at 04:07 PM
No matter, only the power density, but also the reliability, scalability (and thus the price) and also as it is near the date of marketing..
1250 mAh g−1 (or only half of this) for 600 cycles, within 1-2 years would be good
Posted by: joe.vanni | 19 December 2011 at 12:02 AM