DuPont invests in NexSteppe; collaboration on new sweet sorghum and high biomass sorghum hybrids for feedstocks for renewable fuels and chemicals
Delphi MyFi systems connecting through Azure-based cloud

New silica-organic hybrid absorbents deliver among highest performance yet reported for CO2 capture from air

Goeppert
Adsorption of CO2 from the air at 25 °C on FS-PEI-50 and FS-PEI-33 under dry and humid conditions. Credit: ACS, Goeppert et al. Click to enlarge.

A team from the Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute and Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, reports on an improved material for capturing carbon dioxide from the air—silica−organic hybrid adsorbents—in a paper published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Reported capture values under humid conditions are among the highest reported for CO2 adsorption from the air.

After capturing carbon dioxide, the materials give it up easily so that the CO2 can be used in making other substances, or permanently isolated from the environment. The capture material then can be recycled and reused many times over without losing efficiency.

It is now widely accepted that anthropogenic CO2, due to its role as a greenhouse gas, is the major contributor to climate change. Other environmental implications of these emissions, such as ocean acidification, are also becoming increasingly apparent and worrisome. Thus, CO2 management is one of the most challenging issues of our century. Capture and sequestration of CO2 (CCS) underground has been proposed, but none of the existing technologies has been proven on the enormous scale needed. We also need to make sure that if billions of tons of CO2 are pumped underground it also remains there and does not leak out over time.

While fossil fuels will be used for as long as they can be easily and economically produced, it should also be clear that their amounts are finite and that they are increasingly depleted. Post-fossil fuel alternative sources of carbon therefore need to be found to fulfill our needs for fuels, hydrocarbons, polymers, and other products presently derived mostly from petroleum oil and natural gas. Instead of considering CO2 as a problematic and unwanted combustion byproduct, it should be seen as a valuable feedstock for the production of fuels and materials. While the required CO2 can be presently captured from concentrated industrial sources, eventually it will have to be obtained directly from the atmosphere.

...While about half of the anthropogenic CO2 emissions are the result of large industrial sources such as power plants and cement factories, the other half originate from small distributed sources such as cars, home heating, and cooking. For those, CO2 capture at the emission source is not practical and/or economical. A possible pathway to deal with these emissions is to capture CO2 directly from the air.

—Goeppert et al.

The study of the separation and recovery of CO2 from ambient air on a larger scale is in its infancy and has only relatively recently attracted increased interest, they note. Adsorbents based on Ca(OH)2, NaOH, and combinations thereof have been suggested, but their regeneration is generally energy intensive. Amine and polyamine based sorbents either chemically bound or physically adsorbed on a support such as silica, mesoporous solids, and carbon fibers have also been proposed and in some cases tested for CO2 capture from the air. Hyperbranched aminosilicas (HAS) have also been reported as adsorbents for CO2 capture from the air.

The Loker group turned to solid materials based on polyethylenimine (PEIs), a readily available and inexpensive polymeric material. They selected branched PEI with a high molecular weight (Mw = 25,000) as an adsorbent material in large part because of its very low volatility and coated it on the surface of fumed silica. The CO2 adsorption and desorption measurements were performed in an all-glass, grease-free flow system.

Under dry conditions, on FS-PEI-33 the amount of CO2 adsorbed per g of PEI was 156 mg/g, whereas it was 150 mg/g for FS-PEI-50. In the presence of water, these values were 230 and 124 mg CO2/g PEI, respectively. PEI use was almost two times more efficient at a lower loading. A similar trend was already reported in the case of adsorption of pure CO2.

Our reported values under humid conditions are among the highest reported for CO2 adsorption from the air! The 1.74 mmol/g adsorption of FS-PEI-33 obtained under humid conditions was noticeably higher than the one reported for a hyperbranched aminosilica (1.44 mmol/g) with a comparable organic amine content of 36% and closer to the ones obtained on an HAS with a higher organic content of 42.5% (1.72 mmol/g). Triamine-grafted pore-expanded mesoporous silica (TRI-PE-MCM-41), on the other hand, exhibited a CO2 adsorption capacity of 0.98 mmol/g. Operating under humid conditions has a further advantage: Recently, the presence of water has been shown to greatly improve the stability of solid amine based adsorbents by avoiding the formation of urea.

—Goeppert et al.

The researchers suggest the materials may be useful on submarines, in smokestacks or out in the open atmosphere, where they could clean up carbon dioxide emissions that comes from small point sources such as cars or home heaters.

Resources

  • Alain Goeppert, Miklos Czaun, Robert B. May, G. K. Surya Prakash, George A. Olah, and S. R. Narayanan (2011) Carbon Dioxide Capture from the Air Using a Polyamine Based Regenerable Solid Adsorbent. Journal of the American Chemical Society 133 (50), 20164-20167 doi: 10.1021/ja2100005

Comments

A D

Start to make green algae farming with this method, is it clear ?

Engineer-Poet

Nothing specific about the method or energy cost of desorption, and the full paper is behind a paywall.

It's probably not as cheap as potassium carbonate, but it's always a question of "better for what?"

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)