California Energy Commission to award up to $1.75M for work on economic and environmental impacts of plug-in battery packs
IBM establishes the Smarter Energy Research Institute to accelerate transformation of energy and utilities market

Johnson Controls acts to facilitate A123 bankruptcy process, avoid delays by threatened actions from Wanxiang

In collaboration with A123 Systems, Johnson Controls has chosen not to be the debtor-in-possession (DIP) lender during A123’s bankruptcy process to avoid potential delays posed by threatened legal actions from Wanxiang. (Earlier post.) The parties believe this move is in the best interest of the estate by ensuring an efficient process that will best preserve value for creditors, employees and customers.

We are concerned that back-and-forth posturing by other interested parties may lead to confusion and anxiety for A123’s employees and customers and thus destroy underlying value in the estate. We have agreed to step aside as the DIP funder in order to keep the process moving and allow it to conclude in the most efficient manner possible. We want to reassure employees, customers and other stakeholders that Johnson Controls remains committed to our acquisition of A123, which will keep a source of critical jobs, intellectual property and advanced battery technology in the United States.

—Alex Molinaroli, president, Johnson Controls Power Solutions

Johnson Controls maintains its $125 million offer for A123’s automotive assets as well as the stalking horse position in the bankruptcy process subject to Bankruptcy Court approval, expected on 5 November. The company also plans to expand its offer to include A123’s government business, including military contracts, during the bankruptcy process.

A123’s technology provides a combination of performance attributes that make it well suited for a range of applications, including certain automotive and military applications that are complementary to Johnson Controls’ existing portfolio.

—Alex Molinaroli



Should USA's government block A123's sale to Wanxiang even if they offer more than JC if military contracts are not included?



Please point out one US company that cares anything about the US. Money is what matters, and more precisely, how much money the CEO can make in the next three months is what really matters. Wanxiang may be the evil Chinese, but our guys look just like them.

There are no military secret batteries. The people who sell ball point pens also have contracts with the military.

The comments to this entry are closed.