High-performance micro-sized Si-C composite for Li-ion anodes offers high tap density for high volumetric capacity
23 January 2013
|
Cycling performance of the Si-C composite and porous Si at 400 mA/g. Source: Yi et al. Click to enlarge. |
A team at Penn State University has synthesized a micro-sized silicon-carbon (Si-C) composite consisting of interconnected Si and carbon nanoscale building blocks as anode materials for Li-ion batteries (LIBs). The Si-C composite, produced by a low-cost and large-scale approach, exhibits a reversible capacity of 1459 mAh/g after 200 cycles at 1 A/g with a capacity retention of 97.8%, with high-rate performance of 1100 and 700 mAh/g at current densities of 6.4 A/g and 12.8 A/g.
The material, reported in the journal Advanced Energy Materials, also features the highest tap density (0.78 g/cm3) of Si-based materials yet reported in literature and thus achieves a high volumetric capacity, the researchers said. (Tap density is bulk density of a powder after a compaction process.)
Silicon has been intensively pursued as the most promising anode material for high-energy-density LIBs because of its high specific capacity (>3500 mAh/g) and abundance. Despite its high capacity, Si suffers from fast capacity fading caused by its large volume change (>300%) during lithiation/delithiation and the serious issues stemming from this volume change, e.g., unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and disintegration (cracking and crumbling) of the electrode structure. The development of Si-C nanocomposites (e.g., nanowires, nano- tubes, or nanoparticles) has been widely studied.
These nanocomposites proved to be an effective method of improving capacity and cycling stability, since nano-sized Si can alleviate fracture during volume changes and the contact between Si and carbon can maintain electrical contact and improve conductivity of the nanocomposites. However, practical application of nano-sized Si materials in LIBs is difficult. First, achieving a high tap density is important for fabrication of high-energy LIBs for EVs and PHEVs, because it offers a high volumetric energy density. Unfortunately, the tap density of nano-sized materials is generally low, which in turn holds down their volumetric capacity. Furthermore, preparation of nano-sized Si either requires chemical/physical vapor deposition or involves complicated processes, leading to costly, low-yield synthesis that is difficult to scale up to practical levels. To date, the abundance of Si has not been fully capitalized upon due to lack of a low-cost strategy for large-scale synthesis of Si anode materials with superior performance.
—Yi et al.
While micro-sized silicon materials enable higher tap density than nanosized materials, they are more likely to undergo disintegration upon volume change during lithiation/delithiation compared with nanosized materials, resulting in severe capacity fading and also have long ion/electron transport paths that adversely affect high rate capability. A solution that some research teams have suggested would be to develop new materials that combine the advantages of both micro-sized and nano-sized Si materials to improve the cycling performance, rate capability, and energy density of Si anodes.
The Penn State team proposed that micro-sized Si-C composites should have the following features to obtain excellent electrochemical performance:
The size of primary Si building blocks should be small enough to avoid building block fracture induced by volume changes during the lithiation/delithiation process.
Si and C should be uniformly mixed at the nanoscale to improve the conductivity but also be highly packed to improve the tap density of the micro-sized particles.
The carbon and Si building blocks should maintain intimate contact even after the micro-sized Si-C particles are pulverized to prevent loss of electrical contact.
To produce the material, the team started with commercially available micro-sized SiO as the Si source at a gram scale. They heated the SiO to form an Si/SiO2 composite composed of interconnected Si nanoparticles embedded in an SiO2 matrix due to the disproportionation of SiO. This was followed by removal of the SiO2 via an etching route, transforming the Si/SiO2 composite into porous Si particles. Finally, thermal decomposition of acetylene fills a large portion of the original pores with carbon—creating a micro-sized Si-C composite in which Si and carbon are three-dimensionally interconnected at the nanoscale.
|
Preparation process from SiO precursor to the Si-C composite. Source: Yi et al. Click to enlarge. |
They characterized the electrochemical performance of the Si-C composite as well as the porous Si without the carbon filling at different charge/discharge cycles.
The excellent performance [of the micro-sized Si-C composite] is attributed to the nanoscale size of primary particles and interconnected carbon and Si networks which can maintain internal electrical contact and sustain cycling stability. The synthesis method is low-cost and easy to scale up, and is thus believed to have great potential in practical production of high-performance Si materials for Li-ion batteries.
—Yi et al.
Resources
Yi, R., Dai, F., Gordin, M. L., Chen, S. and Wang, D. (2012), Micro-sized Si-C Composite with Interconnected Nanoscale Building Blocks as High-Performance Anodes for Practical Application in Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201200857
Let's do it?
Posted by: HarveyD | 23 January 2013 at 07:14 AM
"The Si-C composite, produced by a low-cost and large-scale approach, exhibits a reversible capacity of 1459 mAh/g after 200 cycles at 1 A/g with a capacity retention of 97.8%, with high-rate performance of 1100 and 700 mAh/g at current densities of 6.4 A/g and 12.8 A/g."
http://news.rice.edu/2012/11/01/rice-team-boosts-silicon-based-batteries/ "that easily achieves 600 charge-discharge cycles at 1,000 milliamp hours per gram (mAh/g)."
This could more than meet the US 5/5/5 battery hub 8% improvements per month.
Think <$20,000, 100's of miles range Leafs.
Posted by: kelly | 23 January 2013 at 08:25 AM
So, let the JCESR people know about this and let mass produce it...right!
I think part of the problem with battery development is no one is talking to anyone else in the research communities and they are all shot gunning the problems. Hopefully, JCESR will gather the data in one place for all to know and work from.
Posted by: Lad | 23 January 2013 at 08:49 AM
There's another twist to this, which is that the properties of the matrix can probably be changed by adding either elemental Si or SiO2 to the initial SiO mix. This would leave less or more open pore space after etching, allowing either greater Si density or more pore space for carbon and electrolyte.
Posted by: Engineer-Poet | 23 January 2013 at 09:39 AM
Lad, Amen.
Posted by: kelly | 23 January 2013 at 10:16 AM
Looks very promising.
Very high capacity.
Good cycling endurance.
Low-cost and easy to manufacture and scale up production.
Go!
Posted by: Dave R | 23 January 2013 at 10:59 AM
Are there many known reasons why so many very high potential technologies are not developed nor mass produced while $$$$$B are being invested into ICEVs, Tar sands, Oil fields, SG, and new pipelines?
Posted by: HarveyD | 23 January 2013 at 01:58 PM
The word is POTENTIAL not existing. Makes all the difference.
Posted by: Mannstein | 23 January 2013 at 02:10 PM
I usually try to avoid this feeling because my hopes are premature and usually get dashed...but this looks really promising.
Posted by: DaveD | 23 January 2013 at 02:14 PM
DaveD, I follow your logic, but the $28,800 2013 Leaf is real. If GM, http://green.autoblog.com/2013/01/17/gms-reuss-next-gen-chevy-volt-will-be-thousands-of-dollars-c/ continues the dominoes, look out.
The reported battery breakthroughs of Obama's first term(NEVER forget more EVs were crushed than built during Bush) are perhaps becoming economic realities this term.
The GM North America President Mark Reuss prepared statement,
"We will see the day when we have an affordable electric car that offers 300 miles of range with all the comfort and utility of a conventional vehicle."
has a certainty I don't previously recall.
Posted by: kelly | 23 January 2013 at 03:07 PM
All what is required to make Mr. Reuss remark come true are low cost ($100/kWh), higher performance (600 Wh/Kg), quick charge batteries.
There's a good chance that they may be around by 2020 or shortly thereafter, if enough resources at are made available for increased R & D and mass production facilities in the right places.
Posted by: HarveyD | 23 January 2013 at 06:30 PM
OK Kelly, I'll join you in this one and say that things are looking better and more definitive.
I'll allow myself to start hoping again :-)
Posted by: DaveD | 23 January 2013 at 06:59 PM
I would be interested to see what happens if you combine Stanford Yi's eggshell cathode and Penn State Yi's nut-crunch anode in one single battery. Do you get something delicious?
Posted by: TexasDesert | 23 January 2013 at 07:23 PM
This is very smart, but it remains to be seen it the process can bu used in high volume lost cost product, high temperature heating followed by etching then re-filling of Carbon works for small parts because it is relatively slow process. But let's see...
Posted by: Treehugger | 23 January 2013 at 10:03 PM
LOL Treehugger, I think that's how they get Nut'n Honey cereal.
Posted by: DaveD | 24 January 2013 at 02:51 AM
Slow processes in big tanks holding lots of stuff can still have big throughput.
Posted by: Engineer-Poet | 24 January 2013 at 08:22 AM
"Are there many known reasons why so many very high..."
Any manufacturer entering the market with any type of product intends to sustain on the market and do everything to secure his position.
ICEs have reached such a high degree of mechanical and electronic complexity that it is no longer possible to carry out repairs on them with a "pair of pliers and strands of barbed wire" as was virtually the case decades ago. Pushing the efficiency ever higher and improving fuel consumption and emissions was a guarantee for the manufacturers to secure their position in business.
I.O.W. You must take your car to an authorized dealer to get your car serviced or repaired. Special-to-type-tooling is not available to the garage around the corner to carry out appropriate maintenance tasks.
This is an excellent racket for sustainable business (certainly not for the customers) and those profiting from such a system would be more than foolish to enhance any innovation that may endanger their own position. They have control of the situation and are keen to assure that everything remains as it is for as long as possible; irregardles of pollution, efficiency, health etc. etc..
Posted by: yoatmon | 25 January 2013 at 07:22 AM
@ yoatman
I agree with you 100%. Whenever I go to a dealer service center and see customers waiting to have their vehicles repaired at $85/hr or just to have the diagnostic scanner plugged in for $150 to tell a knuckle head what sensor needs replacing I feel for the sheeple.
Posted by: Mannstein | 28 January 2013 at 11:28 AM