Reaction Design enhances FORTÉ CFD package with engine knock prediction capabilities
Oerlikon Graziano modifies RWD Lancia 037 rally car with new front-axle hybrid system to create 4WD vehicle

LaunchPoint completing SBIR project on electromechanical valve actuator for fully variable valve system

PRM_Figure11-resized-600
Concept of valve implementation on 4-cylinder head. Source: LaunchPoint. Click to enlarge.

LaunchPoint Technologies, Inc. is completing Phase II of a Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant (IIP-1058556) from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to design and test a novel electromechanical valve actuator designed specifically to control a low-cost, high efficiency valve actuation system that achieves fully variable control over the duration and phase of an engine’s intake valve.

Phase I of the project (NSF SBIR Award No. IIP-0945595) demonstrated a compact, linear-motion actuator capable of driving a typical engine valve. LaunchPoint designed and tested a prototype actuator using the magnetic spring technology originally developed for a high-speed switching mechanism in a space application (US Patent 7,265,470).

Phase I results showed the valve actuator traversing an 8 millimeter trajectory in 3 milliseconds. The data revealed consistent switching trajectories and very smooth landings with speeds less than 0.3 m/sec and almost no oscillations. The Phase II project was aimed at reducing the switching interval even further while improving robustness of the design.

The first-generation valve design supports operation above 6500 rpm when the controller is set for a 2.3 msec full transition across an 8mm lift. The 10%-90% transition time for this controller setting is just 1.35 ms.

The Phase II project also saw the integration of the magnetic valve actuator integrated into a complete engine subsystem. This Magnetic Valve System (MVS) comprises the magnetic valve actuator, an integrated sensor, a control unit, and a power amplifier, which together provide electronic control of the valve timing.

Variable valve timing is desirable for demonstrated improvements in fuel-efficiency, torque, and emissions; however, LaunchPoint says, currently available variable valve timing mechanisms are either too costly or far less effective and robust than desired.

The advantage of LaunchPoint’s technology lies in the high-speed mechanism that recovers the valve’s kinetic energy at the end of each transition from open to closed and vice versa. The stored energy is then released to accelerate the valve on the next transition while also ensuring a soft landing. The low-power electromechanical actuator is used only to “throw” or “catch” the valve at the beginning or the end of the stroke.

Variable valve timing technology has demonstrated a fuel efficiency improvement of up to 20%, torque improvement of 5 to 13%, emission reductions of up to 10% in hydrocarbons, and 40 to 60% in NOx for conventional spark ignition (SI) and compression ignition engines. The demonstrated improvements are even more significant for innovative Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) engines and Compressed Air Hybrid engines.

For example, the NOx reduction is predicted to be two orders of magnitude lower in comparison to a conventional SI engine with almost zero particulate matter emissions.

Valves of this type can be applied to a wide variety of internal combustion engines. An electromechanical valve actuator eliminates the numerous engine components required for a typical camshaft drive, in turn, decreasing manufacturing and maintenance costs and increasing reliability.

Such valves can be designed into new engines and retrofitted to existing engines. The widespread adoption of these valves would substantially decrease petroleum usage and the associated production of greenhouse gases and air pollution, while also promoting energy independence.

LaunchPoint Technologies Inc. is an engineering services and contract R&D firm with expertise in electromagnetics; control theory; motor and generator design and development; medical device design and development; CFD optimization, and prototyping.

Resources

  • Brian A. Paden, Orlo James Fiske, Michael R. Ricci, Murat Okçuoğlu, David B. Paden, and Bradley E. Paden, Application No. PCT/US2013/022080, January 18, 2013.

  • Li, L., Tao, J., Wang, Y., Su, Y. et al., (2011) Effects of Intake Valve Closing Timing on Gasoline Engine Performance and Emissions, SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-3564

Comments

Treehugger

Sounds promising but look bulky, how they can squeeze the thing in a smaller footprint. I wonder if the energy recovery is pneumatic?

GdB

Actually it looks more compact than conventional overhead cams.

GdB

The video and narration is good. Take a look at it. The added cost could be offset by downsizing to fewer cylinders and better MPG from efficiency and a lighter engine and vehicle.

ToppaTom

Could be. Too little data.

They say it is great.

Why would they lie?

Henry Gibson

You could even switch from a four stroke cycle to a two stroke cycle to get extra power for a while. It is the thing to be done finally to save on fuel, and it is similar to the ARTEMIS hydraulic transmission with its electric valves to save on energy, and with both, a single large piston is all that an engine needs. See the INNAS NOAX engine. Air pressure tanks can give a very high torque and a very smooth torque. Electric valves have been tried for years and were even used on some very rare steam locomotives inNorth Africa. ..HG..

Treehugger

Apparently it consumes a lot of energy, 200 watts at 5000RPM per valves ...woop

put 4 of this by cylinder on a 4 cylinders that is 4KWs...a non starter

Herm

what is the drag of a conventional valve set?

D

It has already been done and in production. This is a government subsidized non-starter; and a copy of Fiat's MultiAire electromechanical varaible valve control.

Let's use more government R&D dollars to re-invent the Wheel next...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)