Cobalt partners with two Asian chemical companies on biomass-to-butadiene; equity investment
Saudi Aramco starts Arabian Heavy crude production in Manifa field; 500k bpd by July 2013, 900k bpd by 2014

Paul Scherrer Institute and Toyota R&D team finds tiny memory effect in Li-ion batteries; implications for vehicle battery management systems

The memory effect of the battery is written in a cycle with partial charging (here, 50% of the battery’s storage capacity) followed by complete discharge. In the subsequent cycle, the memory effect is evident through an overvoltage (small “bump”) at precisely the same point at which the partial charging cycle terminates. On the extreme right, the normal voltage curve is shown for comparison. Sasaki et al. Click to enlarge.

Up until now, Li-ion batteries have been considered to exhibit no “memory effect”—a deviation in the voltage of the battery resulting from repeated charging after being only partially discharged that can limit the usability of the stored energy as well as the ability to determine the state of charge of the battery reliably.

Scientists at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) and the Toyota Central R&D Labs, Inc. in Japan have now reported a memory effect in lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) that appears after only one cycle of partial charge and discharge. This finding is important for most battery uses—including electromobility—as the slight voltage change it causes can lead to a reduction in usable capacity and a shift in the correlation between the voltage and charge status, resulting in substantial miscalculations in estimating the state of charge of batteries.

Ours is the first study that has specifically looked for a memory effect in lithium-ion batteries. It had simply been assumed that no such effect would arise.

Our finding results from a combination of critical investigation and careful observation. The effect is in fact tiny: the relative deviation in voltage is just a few parts per thousand. But the key was the idea of looking for it at all. Normal battery tests usually run deep, and not partial charging/discharging cycles. It thus took a flash of inspiration in order to ask what might happen during partial charging in the first place.

—Professor Petr Novak, Head of the Electrochemical Energy Storage Section at the PSI and co-author

In a paper published in the journal Nature Materials, the team characterizes this memory effect of LiFePO4 and explain its connection to the particle-by-particle charge/discharge model.

The effect could be detected and taken into account through clever adaptation of the software in battery management systems, Novak pointed out. Should that prove successful, the memory effect would not stand in the way of a reliable use of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles.

With lithium-iron phosphate, the voltage remains practically unchanged over a large range of the state of charge. This means that even a small anomaly in the operating voltage could be misinterpreted as a major change in the state of charge. In other words, when the state of charge is determined from the voltage, a large error can be caused by a small deviation in the voltage.

The existence of a memory effect is relevant in the context of the anticipated steps towards using lithium-ion batteries in the electric mobility sector. In hybrid cars in particular, the effect can arise during the many cycles of charging/discharging that occur during their normal operation. In such vehicles, the battery is partially recharged during each braking operation by the engine running in a generator mode. It is in turn discharged, and usually only partially, to assist the engine during acceleration phases. The numerous successive cycles of partial charging and discharging lead to individual small memory effects adding up to a large memory effect, as this new study demonstrates.

This leads to an error in the estimate of the current state of charge of the battery, in cases where the state of charge is calculated by software on the basis of the current value of the voltage.

The mechanism. The researchers examined the causes of the memory effect at a microscopic level. The electrode material—in this case lithium-iron phosphate—consists of a large number of small, micrometer-sized particles which are charged and discharged individually one after the other. Researchers refer to this model of charging and discharging as the “many particles model”.

Charging proceeds particle by particle, and involves the release of lithium ions. A fully charged particle is therefore lithium-free and comprises only iron phosphate (FePO4). Discharge in turn involves the re-incorporation of lithium atoms into the electrode particles, so that iron phosphate (FePO4) becomes lithium-iron phosphate (LiFePO4) once more.

The changes in the amount of lithium associated with charging and discharging induce a change in the chemical potential of the individual particles, which in turn changes the voltage of the battery.

However, charging and discharging are not linear processes. During charging, chemical potential initially increases, with the progressive release of lithium ions. But then, the particles reach a critical lithium-content value (and chemical potential). At this point, there is an abrupt transition: the particles give up their remaining lithium ions very rapidly, but are not allowed to change their chemical potential. This is the transition that explains why battery voltage remains practically unchanged over a wide region (voltage plateau).

The existence of this potential barrier is vital for the memory effect to become manifest. Once the first particles have overcome the potential barrier, and have become lithium-free, the electrode particle population gets split up into two groups. I.e.,there is now a clear distinction between lithium-rich and lithium-poor particles (see graphic below).

If the battery is not fully charged, a certain number of lithium-rich particles that have not made it over the barrier will remain. These particles do not remain on the edge of the barrier for long, because this state is unstable, and they will “slide down the slope”, that is, their chemical potential will decrease. Even when the battery is discharged again and all of the particles will come to rest in front of the barrier, this division into two groups will be maintained.

The memory effect is thus a consequence of the particle population being divided into two groups, with very different concentrations of lithium, which is followed by the particles “jumping” over the potential barrier one after the other. This overvoltage, through which the effect is noticeable, is equal to the additional work that needs to be done to carry the particles that lagged behind after a partial charge, over the potential barrier.

The memory effect according to the “Many Particles Model”. The chemical potential of the particles rises steadily at first, as the particles give off lithium ions (Fig. b). Once at Point B (chemical potential barrier), the particles quickly give off the remaining lithium ions (Fig. c). The particles overcome the barrier one after the other rather than simultaneously. After partial charging, some particles return to the front of the barrier (Fig. d). They then “slide down the slope”, so that thermodynamic equilibrium is restored. Now, a division of particles into lithium-rich and lithium-poor is established. This separation persists, even after the battery has been completely discharged (Fig. e and f). During the next charging cycle, this group of lithium-poor particles will cross the barrier first while additional work is needed to take the “delayed” group of lithium-poor particles across the barrier. This implies an overvoltage, the hallmark of a memory effect. Sasaki et al. Click to enlarge.

The time that elapses between charging and discharging a battery plays an important role in determining the state of the battery at the end of these processes. Charging and discharging are processes that alter the thermodynamic equilibrium of the battery, and this equilibrium can be achieved after some time.

Scientists have found that idling a sufficiently long period of time can be used to erase the memory effect. However, in accordance with the many particles model, this only happens under certain conditions. The memory effect only vanished if one waited a sufficiently long time after a cycle of partial charging followed by full discharge.

In such cases, the two particle groups were still separated after the full discharge, but were found on the same side of the potential barrier. Thus, the separation disappeared, because particles attained an equilibrium state, in which they all had the same lithium-content. The memory effect remained, however, providing one waited after the partial charging and before the incomplete discharge. Here, the particles were on opposite sides of the potential barrier, and this prevented a reverse of their division into “lithium-rich” and “lithium-poor”.


  • Tsuyoshi Sasaki, Yoshio Ukyo and Petr Novák (2013) Memory effect in a lithium-ion battery. Nat. Materials, doi: 10.1038/NMAT3623



The voltage goes through an initial spike when charging and then a minimum and then rises again all within voltage range that includes the entire magnitude of the memory effect voltage addition. Thus there is ambiguity already in where the state of charging is just from the typical voltage profile. The memory effect is less than even the normal variation in voltage. Seems the definition of moot.


Indeed, since many test have show shallow cycling dramatically increases battery life.

The comments to this entry are closed.