Siemens integrates EV motor and inverter in single housing; common cooling and SKiN
17 October 2014
|
Siemens has developed a solution for integrating an electric car's motor and inverter in a single housing. Click to enlarge. |
Siemens has developed a solution for integrating an electric car’s motor and inverter in a single housing. The motor and the inverter, part of the power electronics which converts the battery’s direct current into alternating current for the motor, have up to now been two separate components. The new integrated drive unit saves space, reduces weight, and cuts costs.
The solution’s key feature is the use of a common cooling system for both components. This ensures that the inverter’s power electronics don’t get too hot despite their proximity to the electric motor, and so prevents any reduction in output or service life.
Because range is a decisive criterion for purchasing an electric car, automakers are always striving to reduce vehicle weight. This was also the aim of the Siemens engineers. Their idea was to integrate the inverter into the motor, as this would reduce weight because only a single housing would be needed.
In addition, it would create six to seven liters of additional installation space, which could be used for a charging unit, for example. Integration would also eliminate the costs of wiring the motor to the inverter and fewer assembly steps would be needed to produce the vehicle.
Siemens developed the integrated drive unit—Sivetec MSA 3300—on the basis of a series electric motor. The engineers adapted the housing in such a way that the inverter could be integrated into the motor.
One problem they faced was the heat generated by the electric motor. At high temperatures, the output of the IGBT modules—the high-performance semiconductors that convert the battery’s current into alternating current—has to be limited. For this reason, inverters in electric cars always have their own cooling system.
A key feature of the integrated drive unit was therefore the creation of a special cooling water system around the motor and inverter. The coolest water first flows around very thermally sensitive components such as the IGBT modules and the intermediate circuit capacitor, after which it is led into the motor’s cooling jacket.
The water flow system is designed in such a way that a kind of water screen is created between the inverter electronics and the motor. As a result, it thermally isolates the two units from one another.
Another component of the overall solution is the very robust power modules featuring SkiN technology. Introduced in 2011 by power electronics leader Semikron, SKiN technology comprises the consistent application of sintering technology on all material combinations significant to load-cycling in a power module—i.e., sintered compositions replace all soldering and bond connections. When thermal load fluctuates, the electrical contact between the chip and the bonding wire is a weak point of semiconductor components.
(Siemens began collaborating more closely with Semikron on automotive power electronics in 2013, and took over Semikron subsidiary VePOINT. VePOINT developed power electronic components and systems, based on Semikron SKiN technology, specifically for the hybrid and electric vehicle market. (Earlier post.)
SKiN flex layers allow an increase of about 25% surge current in the power module due to the sintered layer on the chip tops. Compared to conventional power modules, the additional performance allows an approximate doubling of the current density. Excellent thermal and electrical properties of the sintered layers increase the module lifetime up to tenfold, Semikron says.
If, in addition, the DCB substrate is sintered directly onto the heatsink, the thermal resistance to the heatsink is reduced drastically over traditional interface materials—such as thermal pastes or foils. This decreases the thermal resistance Rth[j-a] between the semiconductor chip and coolant by up 30%, which enables a power increase or a reduction in volume by up to 35%.
The integrated motor/inverter concept’s feasibility has already been demonstrated in a lab under the typical load curves and operating conditions of an electric motor in an automobile. Siemens said that the industry has expressed interest in Sivetec MSA 3300, and the system was recently nominated for the eCarTec Award 2014, which is the Bavarian State Award for Electric and Hybrid Mobility.
First successful attempts have been made at spinning CNTs into yarn. This yarn replaced the copper windings in the motor and resulted in considerable weight reduction and thermal losses close to nil. The CNTs are also cheaper than copper. The thermal loss reduction also enables increased mileage.
How long will it take before this innovation becomes SOP?
Posted by: yoatmon | 17 October 2014 at 05:25 AM
It is a pity they don't give a power for the engine.
Is it 100kw ? 50 ?
If it was 12-25Kw, it would be useful as a BAS.
Posted by: mahonj | 17 October 2014 at 07:33 AM
mahonj:
Agree! quantify the claims.
Posted by: Lad | 17 October 2014 at 05:00 PM
Yoatman,
That's some interesting stuff I wasn't aware of. Looks like it's on it's way...just still a little early.
Posted by: DaveD | 17 October 2014 at 06:21 PM
Recent high quality e-motors are getting close to 5KW/Kg. If this one can reach that level with the integrated inverter it could be a winner?
Posted by: HarveyD | 17 October 2014 at 06:30 PM
I think the motor used in the Tesla S is also a combined motor/inverter unit, for the same reasons cited above?
Posted by: clett | 18 October 2014 at 02:14 AM
Tesla's inverter is on the other side of the differential, not combined. I would keep them separate, the inverter needs precise cooling.
Posted by: SJC | 18 October 2014 at 10:54 AM
Yoatman:
Exciting stuff; nanotube motors, graphene inverters and maybe solid state batteries.
Posted by: Lad | 18 October 2014 at 01:11 PM
The one question I had was this: Would you need the cooling system as they go to the new SiC inverters anyway? I think this will become obsolete before it could ever hit the market.
Posted by: DaveD | 18 October 2014 at 06:45 PM
I can see that heat being useful in cold climates
Posted by: dursun | 20 October 2014 at 07:08 PM
Lower volume at lower cost = increased e-range with smaller batteries = lower cost BEVs.
Posted by: HarveyD | 21 October 2014 at 05:18 PM