Univ. of Manchester team finds monolayer graphene permeable to protons; implications for PEM fuel cell and other hydrogen technologies
UK makes additional $336 million investment in bicycling; total of $923 million

Ricardo study finds retrofitted Euro III bus can emit less NOx than newer Euro V hybrid

Measurements by Ricardo found that an older Euro III bus retrofitted with a selective catalytic reduction and continuously regenerating particulate trap system can be cleaner in terms of lower NOxemissions than newer Euro V hybrid buses.

The measurements of the retrofitted Euro III bus were an extension of a study of the Brighton & Hove Bus and Coach company fleet in partnership with HORIBA examining the real-world emissions of buses operating through a known pollution hot spot in Brighton city center. As a result of that study, Ricardo published results earlier in the year demonstrating the important role that improving traffic flow can have upon reducing NOx emissions. That study, the findings of which were reported in July, focused on a range of buses including Euro IV, Euro V conventional and Euro V hybrid vehicles.

Testing of the older Euro III retrofitted vehicle was carried out on exactly the same route (Nº 7) as used as the basis of the previous study. This route traverses Brighton and Hove through the air quality hot spot of North Street in the city center, and covers a total of 18km (11 miles) (9km in each direction) with significant gradients throughout.

The bus was instrumented with HORIBA’s advanced Portable Emissions Monitoring System (PEMS) equipment and artificially loaded with ballast representing a 70% passenger load. Multiple trips were conducted in normal traffic during business/shopping hours, stopping at regular bus stops in a similar manner to the normal passenger service.

In addition to highlighting the significant influence of route topology and traffic congestion in driving NOx emissions, the previous study had observed the expected trend of the latest vehicles generating the lowest emissions when the whole Nº 7 route was considered.

In contrast, however, when averaged across the route—and also for the section through the North Street pollution hot spot—the total emissions results of the Euro III retrofitted bus were substantially below those of all of the other buses tested, including the Euro V hybrid vehicle. Data also indicated that of the nitrogen oxides remaining in the exhaust, the NO2 fraction was substantially lowered to below 10% of total NOx.

Significantly from an operational standpoint, however, the retrofitted aftertreatment system required a considerable period of warm-up before its full emissions control functionality could be achieved (typically 5 - 10 minutes from cold start). This may have implications for bus operators with depots in, or close to, low emissions zones.

Scope was also seen both for further optimization of the system calibration by improving the dosing of the SCR system in uphill stop-start traffic, and improving thermal management of the exhaust.

The results of this additional study challenge the conventional received wisdom that newer vehicles are always better in terms of their emissions. While there is some scope for improvement of the installed system, the Euro III retrofit bus equipped with selective catalytic reduction and continuously regenerating particulate trap, produced significantly lower NOx emissions than all other vehicles tested, including a Euro V hybrid.

As bus operators attempt to balance their fleet replacement cycles with the imperative to reduce pollution and hence improve urban air quality, the optimal use of retrofit clean technologies of this nature may be an attractive and highly effective alternative to the early replacement of older vehicles. Local authorities are examining the potential of such retrofit solutions in the rules governing future Low Emissions Zones, as these may provide a highly practical path to reducing emissions at source.

—Jon Andersson, Ricardo manager of aftertreatment and chemical analyses

Comments

Jim McLaughlin

This is old news, no? Euro VI performs much better, particularly in urban driving cycles compared to Euro V and earlier. And what is the difference between a Euro III engine with SCR and DPF added, and a Euro VI engine? Not much. Same as US10 after treatment, which happened in North America long before Euro VI when into effect in Europe. US10 NOx limits are still more strict than Euro VI.

The comments to this entry are closed.