Electrochemical Society & Toyota announce ECS Toyota Young Investigator Fellowship for projects in green energy technology
Researchers develop dual-performance anode material for both Li-ion and Li-S batteries

CCFA counters Paris mayor’s proposed total diesel ban with suggestion to focus on legacy fleet

The Comité des Constructeurs Français d’Automobiles (CCFA) (the French automobile manufacturers association) characterized the recent declaration by Anne Hidalgo, Mayor of Paris, that she wished to eliminate diesel vehicles in the city by 2020 as lacking realism, and suggested that the best solution to improve urban air quality requires taking action on the more heavily polluting legacy fleet.

Mayor Hidalgo described her anti-pollution plan, which will be considered by the Conseil de Paris (the assembly governing the city) on 9 February, to the weekly Le Journal du Dimanche (leJDD) on 6 December. Among the elements of the plan are a total ban on diesel in Paris in 2020; the Rue de Rivoli and the Champs-Élysées to be dedicated to ultra-low emission clean vehicles; and the four districts of the center to be transformed into vast semi-pedestrian areas.

In an interview with leJDD in November, Mayor Hidalgo said that she intended to go much further than what had already done on restricting the travel of the most polluting vehicles in the city. Her longer-range plans include heavy reliance on public transport, electric vehicles, and cycling.

In the interview in which she outlined the scope of her anti-pollution plan, she said:

The measure is clear: I want the end of diesel in Paris in 2020, and possibly beyond the périphérique [Boulevard Périphérique is a controlled-access dual-carriageway ring road in Paris, and is generally accepted as the boundary between the city of Paris and its suburbs.]

Reaction to the proposed plan has been, as might be expected, mixed. A review of the situation in the New York Times noted that while praised by public health officials, the plan has been called elitist by its critics. Until recently, the Times also observed, policy makers in Europe, including France, “were extolling diesel cars as cleaner and more fuel efficient compared with gas-guzzling vehicles, emitting less carbon dioxide per kilometer. The promotion of diesel fuel has been especially notable in France, where it is less expensive than unleaded gas.

The French automakers in their CCFA statement tried to draw a distinction between older, more highly polluting diesels and the new Euro 5/6 diesels on the market now. (The CCFA has five members: Alpine, Citroën Automobiles, Automobiles Peugeot, Renault and Renault Trucks.)

The CCFA has always supported the accelerated renewal of the older car parc, because the performance of new vehicle meets the latest European diesel standards, among the strictest in the world. When Madam Mayor of Paris declared her wish “eradicate diesel vehicles by 2020,” it makes no distinction between the old diesel vehicles and modern diesel vehicles equipped with the latest pollution control technologies (standards Euro 5/6). The difference is real and it would be wrong to suggest that today we can speak of “the” diesel as a single technology.

European regulations reduced pollutant emissions from diesel vehicles to those of gasoline vehicles. How, in this context, to justify the prohibition of [diesel] traffic? Why not rely on the order of May 2013, which identifies the vehicles in the fleet, according to their levels of emissions, for the implementation of the traffic restriction project in the capital?

By adopting this plan 2020, Paris is the only city [of those] in Europe that have implemented traffic restrictions (e.g., London, Berlin ...) to ban diesel vehicles that comply with European regulations.

Japan, for its part, provides even now tax incentives for diesel vehicles at Level Regulatory particulate emissions… CCFA joins the opinion of the ADEME [Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Énergie (France’s Environment and Energy Management Agency)] which states that “in order to reduce the impact on the air quality of road transport in the most polluted urban areas, it is necessary to act primarily on the most polluting vehicles particles and NOx, especially diesel vehicles without closed particulate filters which still account for about two-thirds of the park.”


However, a recent study by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) found that on-road NOx emission levels of Euro 6 diesel cars in Europe are on average about seven times higher than the NOx limit set by the Euro 6 emission standard. (Earlier post.) The study follows another recent ICCT report showing that the gap between official and real-world fuel-economy figures in Europe has risen to about 38%. (Earlier post.)

The study—the most comprehensive report on the real-world behavior of the latest generation of diesel cars published to date—found “remarkable” differences among individual vehicle models, indicating that technologies for real-world clean diesels already exist but are not being employed consistently by different vehicle manufacturers.

Unless the appropriate technical measures are adopted, the high on-road emissions of NOx from the new diesel technology classes of passenger cars could have serious adverse health effects on the exposed population. Regulatory action is urgently required in Europe, where all new diesel passenger cars sold from September 2014 belong to the Euro 6 class and the regional share of diesel vehicles in the passenger car fleet is higher than anywhere else in the world. In this sense, the European RDE-LDV initiative … requiring the inclusion of on-road testing with PEMS as part of the passenger car type-approval process in the EU is a step in the right direction. However, the existence of the real-world diesel NOx issue must be acknowledged by regulators in its full extent and subsequently addressed in collaboration with vehicle manufacturers and other stakeholders.

—Franco et al.




Anyone who has sat behind some diesel cars at the lights knows that the supposed cleanliness often has little to do with reality.

The important thing is to remove incentives for diesel.
Plug in hybrids as in the Mitsubishi Outlander are approaching being truly competitive, and provide a much cleaner route to CO2 and emissions efficiency.


Hardly surprising that the CCFA wants older vehicles targetted, and owners presumably forced to go out and buy new cars, but in this context I'm pleased to see that ICCT study of Euro6 diesels quoted.Bon Chance, Mayor Hidalgo.


I don't go overboard on enthusiasm for battery electric cars under all circumstances, but in the case of France it is a no-brainer.

They can run many millions of electric cars on their idled nuclear capacity at night.

By 2016 we should have better batteries giving ~150 miles of range for a BEV or much more economic PHEVs.

What is not to like, and why do they need diesel?


They are really a bunch of incompetants, I know why their country is in an economic slowdown. I always knew that diesel are dirty and these particulate filters just work for a while before been clog and stop filtering. It will happen to the bew 2014 cars also.

I can sell to them my old used gasser at 4x the price and take for free one of their diesel in exchange, LOL.

If they remove cars from the city it will provoke bankruptcies everywhere. Just switch to small cheap efficient gasoline cars, now. Sell the remaining diesel cars somewhere where there is less pollution and buy gasoline. I offe4r my dodge neon 2005 for a brand new 2010 to 2014 diesel car, call me.


ICCT may have found that real-world NOx emissions from diesels are much higher than the regulatory limit (with one exception) but they also found that real-world emissions of all of the other regulated emissions (CO, VOC, PM) are FAR below the regulatory limits (by a factor of 100 or more). No credit is given for those emission reductions.

By the way, have similar real-world emissions tests been done on gasoline vehicles?


So now we have the end of the so-called Euro 'clean' Diesel, which was never clean. Yet the Green Phonies politicked for its admission and allowance in the USA. I'm glad they never succeeded.

Even the EU VI standards just adopted, and equivalent to American standards in force since the 1980s, some thirty years ago, turn out to not be enforced and unmet in reality.

Meanwhile by 2017, America will tighten its Air Quality standards once more, from clean to pristene Air.

Tier III an SULEV II, (Fed and CARB versions) will require American cars to be as non-polluting as ZEV BEVs.

I welcome its promulgation, except for the grafted on and completely unneeded CO2 regulations.

CO2 concerns are turning out to be a complete hoax and farce, and merely a grab for power and raised taxes.

Using its current T2B5 standards, still somewhat tighter than EU VI, America has produced EPA Air Quality Compliance in 2490 or so of the 2500 counties in America. It is well on the way to cleaning up the remaining handful of non compliant counties.

America has won its Victory over Air pollution and all but the most ignorant true believers, like posters on these benighted pages, know it.


These are the unintended consequences of high fuel taxes.

The comments to this entry are closed.