California roadmap for grid-connected energy storage technology
Nissan and NASA form 5-year R&D partnership for autonomous drive vehicles

Fuji Pigment unveils rechargeable Aluminum-air battery; targeting initial commercialization this spring

A schematic diagram of the ALFA cell, showing the placement of the ceramic material. Mori 2015. Click to enlarge.

Fuji Pigment Co. Ltd. has developed a new type of aluminum-air battery which can be recharged by refilling with salt or fresh water and which uses a modified structure to ensure longer battery lifetime. The company said it is constantly improving the battery performance and plans to commercialize the technology in the market by spring 2015. The technology, developed by Dr. Ryohei Mori, has been described in several papers over the past few few years, the most recent being an open access paper in the Journal of the Electrochemical Society.

Metal-air batteries use a catalytic air cathode in combination with an electrolyte and metal anode such as lithium, aluminum, magnesium or zinc. With very high theoretical energy densities, metal air technology is considered a promising technology candidate for “beyond Li-ion” next-generation batteries enabling future long-range battery-electric vehicles—assuming the development obstacles can be overcome.

Aluminum is an abundant, attractive anode material for energy storage and conversion because of its high specific capacity and highly negative standard electrode potential. In addition, aluminum is the most recycled metal in the world and is economically cheap. Highlighting this potential, Alcoa and Israel-based Phinergy in February 2014 entered into a joint development agreement to develop further Phinergy’s aluminum-air batteries. (Earlier post.)

Aluminum-air batteries the systems offer a theoretical specific energy of 8.1 kWh/kg (with respect to aluminum)—second only to the Li-air battery (13.0 kWh/kg).

However, aluminum-air technology suffers from parasitic hydrogen evolution caused by anode corrosion during discharge; this has been a long-standing barrier to the commercialization of aluminum–air batteries. Not only does it cause additional consumption of the anode material, but it also increases ohmic loss in the cell.

Parasitic corrosion has been shown to be suppressed by doping with high-purity aluminum (99.999% grade) and other alloying elements as well as by introducing corrosion inhibitors into the electrolyte. However, Dr. Mori noted in his JECS paper, these approaches have been largely unsuccessful in the commercial production of aluminum–air batteries, as by-products such as Al2O3 and Al(OH)3 accumulate at the anode and cathode, hindering further battery reaction.

To address this, Dr. Mori modified the aluminum-air battery structure by placing ceramic and carbonaceous materials between aqueous electrolyte and electrodes as an internal layer. This modified structure suppresses anode corrosion and byproduct accumulation, resulting in longer battery lifetime.

In an earlier work, we demonstrated the use of ceramic aluminum ion conductors in preventing anodic corrosion while maintaining aluminum ion conductivity. We used Al2(WO4)3 as an aluminum ion conductor for both the anode and the air cathode. An aluminum–air battery with a rechargeable battery was fabricated, and its properties were stable for one month. We named this cell as ALFA cell, in reference to the acronyms for its major components: an aluminum anode, an Al2(WO4)3 lid, an Al2(WO4)3 film, and an air cathode. (We refer to the material that covers the air cathode as the “lid”.)

During this study, we noticed that Al2(WO3)4 had an intrinsic electrical conductivity of nearly 4 × 10−6 S cm−1 at 600 ◦C; however, its conductivity was not high at room temperature. We found that the liquid electrolyte had penetrated the solid electrolyte region (the space between the ceramic particles), reaching the electrode. It was thus considered possible to fabricate a rechargeable aluminum–air battery with an insulating material, such as aluminum oxide, in order to replace the solid electrolyte.

In our previous study, aqueous NaCl was used as an electrolyte. In the present study, we used NaOH and KOH to investigate the functionality of the ALFA cell and to verify the validity of our assumptions. Another aspect considered was that the major drawback of a metal–air battery is evaporation of its liquid electrolyte. Therefore, to investigate the possibility of preventing liquid electrolyte evaporation in the ALFA cell, we added glycerin to aqueous NaCl solution.

—Mori (2015)

Basic properties of the battery as now announced by Fuji Pigment: 0.7-0.8 V; 400-800 mA/cell (10 cm x 10 cm); 4-8 mA/cm2. The battery works for a minimum of 14 days by refilling with water occasionally. Fuji Pigment says it modify the battery at the request of customers—for example: 10.0-12.0 V, 4.0-8.0 A, or more.


  • Ryohei Mori (2015) “Addition of Ceramic Barriers to Aluminum–Air Batteries to Suppress By-product Formation on Electrodes Batteries and Energy Storage” J. Electrochem. Soc. 162(3): A288-A294; doi: 10.1149/2.0241503jes

  • Ryohei Mori (2014) “A novel aluminium–air secondary battery with long-term stability” RSC Adv., 4, 1982-1987 doi: 10.1039/C3RA44659J



The cell is 0.75V, 400-800 mA for a 10x10cm cell.
This does not seem very impressive - A Liion battery can do 3.6V at 3200 mA in 18x18x65 mm - way more power and way smaller.
What is the deal here - are the ALFA batteries very cheap to make - do they last a very long time?
Am I missing something ?


I think it has more to do with the assumption that this battery can be recharged with a fluid change/addition and would have the potential of 8100wHr/kg. I'm no chemist, I'm not sure how it works allegedly, but apparently they have some form of electron exchange membrane.

Aluminum is cheaper, more prevalent, and readily available.
Could be an interesting outcome if it could unseat lithium as the king of battery technology.


If a cheap 100 kg battery would suffice for a Tesla-class EV, that would be the end of the ICEV.  Heck, even 200 kg.

The problem IMO is specific power.  0.7 V @ 400 mA is just 280 mW; it would take 100,000 of them to supply 28 kW, a reasonable figure for cruise power in a large sedan.  This seems much better suited for electronics with ultra-long battery life.

Roger Pham

Another problem would be that the Aluminum will eventually be consumed and has to be replaced. The round-trip efficiency for the regeneration of Aluminum metal from Aluminum Oxides is very poor, on order of 13%. This is only a fraction of the round-trip efficiency of H2-FC, another type of Metal-Air battery, considering the fact that H2 is on the Metal side of the Periodic Table. H2 can flow on pipelines and on filling tubes from the tank of an H2 station to the FCEV car, whereas Aluminum cannot. Replacing the Aluminum electrodes on routine basis of an Aluminum Air battery is problematic.

We already have a highly efficient and light-weight Metal Air battery ready for commercial deployment, and that's what the FCEV's are based upon.

The comments to this entry are closed.