PG&E proposes major build-out of 25,000 electric vehicle charging stations in California
Harvard hybrid “bionic leaf” converts solar energy to liquid fuel isopropanol

ChargePoint calls PG&E’s proposed 25,000-station charging network a bad idea

On Monday, PG&E announced it had filed an application with the California Public Utilities Commission to build out a network of 25,000 electric car charging stations. (Earlier post.) In response, Pasquale Romano, CEO of ChargePoint—currently the world’s largest electric vehicle (EV) charging network—issued a statement charging that the PG&E proposal “creates a monopoly in EV charging equipment and services that will stifle growth and innovation in the market.”

Allowing one monopoly utility to define the EV charging hardware, network, pricing, features and everything in between, will reduce competition and innovation. Removing station owner choice will leave little incentive to innovate or provide better or more affordable services to consumers. ChargePoint has been successful because it supports flexibility for the site owner to decide what pricing and features are best for them to attract the EV driving public. Additionally, ChargePoint prides itself in providing the features required by EV drivers for a seamless driving and charging experience. PG&E’s proposal will hamper the industry, is bad for ratepayers, bad for EV drivers and bad for California’s emissions reduction goals.

—Pasquale Romano

PG&E plans to have its ratepayers fund the proposed $654-million build out.

ChargePoint said that it believes utilities should play a significant role in the EV industry, and pointed to the approach taken by Southern California Edison—installing electric infrastructure—as an example. This approach protects customer choice and encourages continued innovation in EV charging hardware, network and services, ChargePoint said.



These comments come from somebody who wants to protect his investment and market, not end users interest.

ChargePoint could always compete by installing 25,000+ chargers?

Bob Wallace

Ox gored. Screams of owner heard.

Jan-Willem Heinen

The root cause of this problem is the acute lack of interoperability. Here in the Netherlands, any type of charge point is potentially connected to any type of back office, accessible with a charge pass from any brand or vendor. This interoperability technology is called OCPP and works out really well.

The alternative case would then be: whenever PG&E decides to invest in charge points, it selects charge point manufacturer X, maintenance corp Y, uses its own backoffice and allows the charge points to be used with charge passes of vendors A, B, C, etc.

....and everybody then profits. Even PG&E, ChargePoint, and all those EV drivers out there.

The comments to this entry are closed.