New Ford S-MAX first worldwide to offer Intelligent Speed Limiter
Praj to license Gevo’s isobutanol technology for sugar-based ethanol plants

Report: VW Group to decide how to proceed with Quantumscape solid state energy storage by July

Bloomberg reports that the Volkswagen Group will decide by July how to proceed with solid state energy storage technology under development by Quantumscape (earlier post), citing Prof. Dr. Martin Winterkorn, Chairman of the Board of Management, who spoke outside a press conference in Stuttgart.

According to the report, Winterkorn said that the technology’s potential to boost the range of battery-powered vehicles is compelling and tests are progressing. “Progress has been made,” he said. Quantumscape several days ago posted 11 job openings, seeking a manager or director of battery manufacturing operations; a process engineering manager to lead a team in the development of a new energy storage technology from initial process concept through demonstration of stable production; and R&D technicians, battery engineers and scientists.

In December, Bloomberg reported that Volkswagen Group had taken a 5% stake in the company, which formed in 2010 to commercialize a novel solid-state energy storage technology—the “All-Electron Battery” (AEB), originally developed at Stanford and supported by the US Department of Energy’s (DOE) ARPA-E BEEST program (earlier post).

The All-Electron Battery stores energy by moving electrons, rather than ions, and uses electron/hole redox instead of capacitive polarization of a double-layer. ARPA-E said that the technology uses a novel architecture that has potential for very high energy density because it decouples the two functions of capacitors: charge separation and breakdown strength.

In his remarks made at Stanford University in November 2014 during the award of the third Science Award for Electrochemistry to Dr. Vanessa Wood, noted that he saw “great potential” in solid-state batteries. (Earlier post.)

In its most recent US patent application, published on 12 February 2015 and filed on 6 August 2013, Quantumscape outlined a solid-state Lithium-air battery cell using a garnet electrolyte material.

The solid state electrolyte enables a lithium metal anode plus a solid state catholyte with high conductivity to avoid the problems of decomposition with conventional liquid catholytes. The catholyte—which should be stable at >3V versus Li, highly conductive, and stable to air—is preferably an oxide material such as a garnet (La3Li7Zr2O12 and variants) and may be coated with a conductive carbon via a vapor-phase or liquid-phase coating for electron conductivity.

Such a structure provides a high surface-area to provide a high density of reaction sites. The all solid-state system would enable high energy density, high power density, and reversibility of a lithium-air battery, according to the claims.

Other earlier patents relate to the electron battery.

Resources

Comments

HarveyD

Will this small start-up (with the help of VW) beat Toyota with a practical, affordable improved solid state battery for future extended range BEVs?

Will others board the SS battery train?

Lad

Nothing new here...just more VW PR...they are a PR firm that just happens to build autos. I figure the SS battery should be good for about 5 years of PR before we see one charged in Public.

Davemart

@Lad:
At a guess you are one of those who claimed that VW would never produce an electric car, or Audi either.
So you have a 100% record do far.

Larzen

I'm more interested in the details of VW/Stanford, and Stanford's research up to the point of sale. If it's breakthrough technology, isn't it in the interest of the government of the United States to keep it here?

Larzen

I mean Stanford/Quantumscape. Did they license the process, or sell it, plus many other things unmentioned.

Davemart

Larzen:
Given the size of VW's operations in the US, and companies like GM and Ford's outside the US for instance in China, it is increasingly difficult to tell where 'here' is.

Lad

@Davemart:
Let the countdown begin; I say 5 years...they got about that much PR time out of their vapor EV until they finally built one.

They aren't the only ones that do this; just one of the best at it. Producing vapor on futures is about as cheap as PR gets.

Mannstein

The process to mine lanthanum is difficult, time consuming and expensive. Wonder what that will do to the price of the batteries?

Davemart

@Lad:
So are you one of those who claimed that the VW group would never actually build BEV or PHEV cars?
Its a simple question.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)