Audi wins WEC opener at Silverstone in R18 e-tron quattro
Proton OnSite delivers electrolyzer for first power-to-gas project in the US

New Li-S battery shows cycle performance comparable to that of Li-ion batteries along with more than double the energy density

A team of researchers in South Korea and Italy has demonstrated a highly reliable lithium–sulfur battery showing cycle performance comparable to that of commercially available lithium-ion batteries while offering more than double the energy density. The team, led by a group from Hanyang University, used a highly reversible dual-type sulfur cathode (solid sulfur electrode and polysulfide catholyte) and a lithiated Si/SiOx nanosphere anode.

In a paper in the ACS journal Nano Letters , they reported that the lithium–sulfur cell showed superior battery performance in terms of high specific capacity, excellent charge–discharge efficiency, and remarkable cycle life, delivering a specific capacity of ∼750 mAh g–1 over 500 cycles (85% of the initial capacity). These promising behaviors may arise from a synergistic effect of the enhanced electrochemical performance of the newly designed anode and the optimized layout of the cathode, they suggested.

Credit: ACS, Lee et al. Click to enlarge.

Lithium-sulfur batteries offer a great deal of promise as a next-generation battery technology, with the natural abundance and low cost of sulfur, coupled with the high theoretical energy density of sulfur-based cathodes: 1675 mAh g−1 and 2500 Wh kg−1. They also carry a number of well-known challenges limiting their commercialization, including low active material utilization, and low stability of the sulfur electrodes due to the formation of soluble lithium polysulfides during cell operation.

There has been consistent progress recently toward optimizing the sulfur electrodes, for example, by the use of conductive carbonaceous matrices and metal−organic framework (MOF) for sulfur impregnation, as well as by the choice of suitable electrolytes. Recently, several research groups have reported that the addition of lithium polysulfide to the electrolyte could improve the performance of the Li/S batteries in terms of cycle performance and energy density.

Another major concern regarding the lithium−sulfur battery system is its use of a lithium−metal anode, which is well-known to have some critical problems including chemical reactivity in commonly used organic electrolytes and dendritic growth of lithium during cycling, leading to poor cycle performance and safety problems. In addition, when coupled with a sulfur cathode, the lithium metal anode reacts with lithium polysulfide to form an insoluble Li2S phase on lithium−metal surface, leading to the loss of lithium metal and eventually causing poor cycle performance of the system.

To minimize the problems associated with lithium−metal anode an excess amount of lithium metal usually is needed to construct the full cell to secure its long cycle life, which might lead to degradation of both the energy density and the safety of the full cell. Recently, alloy-type anode materials have been suggested as alternatives to replace the lithium−metal anode. However, even though some examples have shown promise for practical use with sulfur cathodes, the cycle performance and the energy density of lithium−sulfur battery system adopting alloy-type anode materials needs to be advanced further before they can penetrate the rechargeable battery market.

—Lee et al.

To address these issues, the researchers designed a LiS cell using a dual-type hybrid sulfur cathode and a lithiated Si/SiOx nanosphere anode with an optimized liquid electrolyte.

The cathode consists of an activated carbon−sulfur composite on a gas diffusion layer (GDL) electrode in contact with a catholyte solution to which Li2S8 has been added. This cathode system delivers a maximum capacity of ∼1300 mAh g−1 with respect to the overall mass of sulfur (about 1.2 mg) from both the solid sulfur (about 0.2 mg on the electrode) and the dissolved lithium polysulfide (1.024 mg in 80 μL of the polysulfide-containing electrolyte).

At a rate of C/3, the cathode shows a capacity of ∼1000 mAh g−1; Coulombic efficiencies of more than 99.3% except for the first cycle; and a maintenance of the capacity above 99% of the initial capacity even after 100 cycles.

The lithiated Si/SiOx nanosphere anode used shows highly stable cycling behavior over 100 cycles with a capacity of as high as 800 mAh g−1 and cycling efficiency approaching 100%.

The full lithium-ion sulfur cell presented in the study delivers a capacity of ∼750 mAh g−1 with an average working voltage of about 1.8 V, corresponding to the energy density of 497 Wh kg−1 based on the weight of active materials on the cathode and anode.

We believe that these results might advance the development of practical lithium−sulfur batteries, particularly for use in emerging markets, including portable devices, electric vehicles, and large-scale power storage systems for renewable energies.

—Lee et al.


  • Sang-Kyu Lee, Seung-Min Oh, Eunjun Park, Bruno Scrosati, Jusef Hassoun, Min-Sik Park, Young-Jun Kim, Hansu Kim, Ilias Belharouak, and Yang-Kook Sun (2015) “Highly Cyclable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries with a Dual-Type Sulfur Cathode and a Lithiated Si/SiOx Nanosphere Anode” Nano Letters doi: 10.1021/nl504460s



'The full lithium-ion sulfur cell presented in the study delivers a capacity of ∼750 mAh g−1 with an average working voltage of about 1.8 V, corresponding to the energy density of 497 Wh kg−1 based on the weight of active materials on the cathode and anode.'

Good to see the results presented at the cell level for a change.
Sounds great, but those of us who have been on this forum for some years and initially eagerly followed every mooted advancement have become a little jaded and battle-weary, as they seem to usually disappear or be indefinitely delayed.

Wonderful if this makes it out of the lab though.



Agreed on our burnout regarding announcements of "breakthroughs". :(

But I'm not sure where you got the 497Wh/kg unless you read the paper....which I don't have time to do as I'm at work right now LOL

But they said that was 750mAh/g at the cell level so that would be 1,350Wh/kg at the cell level....unless the paper talks about some other factor I'm missing???


Oh, geez, I didn't even bother reading the bottom of the article....never mind. I see that they claim the 497Wh/kg. But that still doesn't add up to what they said earlier about ~750mAh/kg.

Oh well, it is what it is...if it even turns out to be viable in the real world anyway.


The use of silicone in the anode seems to stimulating a lot of research but the silicone/graphene mix as reported recently ( the most promising for Li-S batteries thus far and will probably hit the market first.

Come on guys, don't get jaded, the fun is just beginning.


I'm trying, Marcus, I really am. :)

I really do know that many things will eventually hit the market...I'm just ready for the first few to start rolling out!


¡¡Very excelent!!. Vamos a ver según el articulo la celda Li-s con 500 ciclos y 497wh/kg ya esta ahy.....pero me desconcierta lo que comentan al final: Estos avances pueden desembocar en celdas de alto rendimiento para varios tipos de aparatos electronicos. Como que "pueden" según el articulo la celda ya esta lista para comercializarla ¿o no?. ¿Solo soy yo el que ve la confusión?.


Wondering if Aluminum Ion will be better cheaper and have equal density? That tech is not out either. How many years before this might be real?


If you're referring to the recent Al Ion announcement it's at 40wh/kg, so pretty crappy.


Aluminum consuming batteries could replace ICE and/or FC range extenders.

PHEVs equipped with (future high performance) larger capacity (50+ kWh) rechargeable batteries may not have to change the aluminum plates in the range extender unit very often.

Such PHEVs could go 1600+ Km (about two days driving on long trips) and arrange for plate changing every second day on so.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)