New promising solid-state electrolyte for rechargeable Li-metal batteries
22 May 2015
|
The new solid-state electrolyte shows electrochemical stability up to 10 V vs Li/Li+. Credit: ACS, Rangasamy et al. Click to enlarge. |
A team led by researchers from Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has developed a promising solid-state electrolyte for use in advanced rechargeable batteries with Li-metal anodes: a Li7P2S8I phase that exhibits the characteristics of a solid solution between Li3PS4 and LiI with fast ion conduction and electrochemical stability up to 10 V vs Li/Li+. A paper describing the work is published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.
The material has room-temperature ionic conductivity of up to 6.3 × 10−4 S cm−1—400% higher than that of β-Li3PS4 and more than 3 orders of magnitude higher than that of LiI. It also is very compatible with a Li metal anode; the presence of I enhances the stability of the electrolyte with metallic Li anode while demonstrating low charge-transfer resistance.
Solid-state electrolytes are quickly rising to prominence as useful components of advanced Li battery technologies due to their excellent electrochemical stability, favorable mechanical properties, and operation over a wide temperature window. Previous investigations have resulted in multiple solid-state Li-ion conductors that exhibit favorable characteristics for application in a full electrochemical cell. A Li10GeP2S12 solid-state electrolyte has been reported with conductivity rivaling that of conventional liquid electrolytes. However, the presence of Ge makes it unstable with metallic Li anodes. Despite the number of promising candidates, very few systems have been demonstrated to be successful under a full electrochemical setup as a result of interfacial kinetic limitations and electrode−electrolyte compatibility issues.
High-energy batteries use metallic Li as anode and high-voltage materials as cathode. Therefore, it is critical to develop suitable solid electrolytes with high ionic conductivity and excellent chemical stability not only against the Li anode but also at higher voltages, to facilitate high-voltage cathodes and guard against cell abuse.
—Rangasamy et al.
β-Li3PS4 shows the requisite characteristics, but it forms a buffer layer with the Li metal anode to produce the observed stability. Lithium halides have been shown to enhance ionic conductivity, but have been shown also to exhibit instability. The researchers sought to determine if it possible to incorporate LiI (a lithium halide) into a solid-state Li-ion conductor to enhance ionic conductivity while simultaneously eliminating the inherent oxidation of LiI (and resulting instability) and its low ionic conductivity.
They found that mixing LiI with Li3PS4 and applying a subsequent heat treatment, resulted in the formation of Li7P2S8I—a new phase different from either parent.
In addition to the superior ionic conductivity, the new phase exhibits an electrochemical stability higher than that of state-of-the-art garnet electrolytes (9V vs Li/Li+ and typical sulfide electrolytes (5 V vs Li/Li+).
The presence of I enhances the stability of the electrolyte with metallic Li anode while demonstrating low charge-transfer resistance. These characteristics form a foundation that allows the electrolyte to exhibit excellent cycle life and stability at ambient conditions. The material property of the electrolyte allows low-temperature densification and enhanced processability, which is vital to developing industrial-scale solid electrolyte membranes. Currently investigations are underway to identify the crystal structure and mechanism of Li-ion conduction in the newly formed phase along with polymeric reinforcement for flexible solid electrolyte membranes. This opens new avenues for the development of inherently safe all-solid Li batteries.
—Rangasamy et al.
Resources
Ezhiylmurugan Rangasamy, Zengcai Liu, Mallory Gobet, Kartik Pilar, Gayatri Sahu, Wei Zhou, Hui Wu, Steve Greenbaum, and Chengdu Liang (2015) “An Iodide-Based Li7P2S8I Superionic Conductor” Journal of the American Chemical Society 137 (4), 1384-1387 doi: 10.1021/ja508723m
Could this be an important step towards the development of future solid state higher performance improved batteries?
Toyota should be very interested to use this technology for their future BEVs.
Can it be mass produced at an affordable price by 2020 or so? If so, the battle for BEVs dominance may arrive soon thereafter.
Posted by: HarveyD | 22 May 2015 at 07:04 AM
I think traction batteries will eventually evolve into solid state devices, using different electrodes than Lithium. JCESR is researching the use of Al and Mg as electrodes. They claim there is an advantage to moving 2 and 3 ions in the same time frame as moving one using Li. We'll see.
Posted by: Lad | 22 May 2015 at 08:57 AM
Stanford Researcher Yi Cui, also founder of Amprius, sees difficulty for Al and Mg within 20 years.
https://youtu.be/ISEzvNevyck
Comments on Al and Mg toward the end.
Posted by: electric-car-insider.com | 22 May 2015 at 01:43 PM
It appears that Dr. Chengdu Liang of ORNL has made significant progress on the Lithium Polysulfidophosphate solid electrolyte since 2013. Future work should include a full cell all-solid Lithium-Sulfur batteries with optimized cell components (possibly using the Carbon Nanofiber-Encapsulated Sulfur Cathodes developed by Yi Cui). Lithium Sulfur batteries have a theoretical energy density of 2550 Wh/kg, though a practical goal would be 500 Wh/kg. Cell cost is also low: $100/kWh. Let's hope we see this soon, maybe before 2020.
Posted by: Account Deleted | 22 May 2015 at 03:50 PM
Actually, Yi Cui has a new framework for sulfur cathodes using a silicon–carbon pomegranate-like cluster structure (ref: http://www.stanford.edu/group/cui_group/papers/Weiyang_Cui_AEM_2015.pdf, published in Advanced Energy Materials, 8 MAY 2015
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201500211)
Posted by: Account Deleted | 22 May 2015 at 04:06 PM
e-c-i:
Yes, I saw that video. it will be interesting to see what happens with Al and Mg; JCESR's goal was five years for a battery at 1/5 the cost and 5 times the density. They have three years to go; but, I have no idea if they are stuck in a circle or not; as a taxpayer and reluctant investor, I would like to know how how the project is progressing.
Posted by: Lad | 22 May 2015 at 05:14 PM
I plan to write about JCESR later this year, hopefully will be able to answer that question Lad.
Posted by: electric-car-insider.com | 23 May 2015 at 06:13 AM
Great, and thank you!
Posted by: Lad | 23 May 2015 at 09:47 AM
JCESR | Joint Center for Energy Storage Research
www.jcesr.org/
Posted by: jzj | 23 May 2015 at 09:50 AM
Even if they invent a cheap powerful battery I won't but a pure bev because of recharging difficulty and I live in an apartment so I need a fast-charger nearby with a charge that I can keep for a full week of 300 miles approx. But a small range extender can really help sometime for longer journeys.
Posted by: gorr | 24 May 2015 at 07:07 AM