CFBP and Global Bioenergies: success of tests on including renewable isobutene in domestic bottled gas
Hyundai showcasing two new turbocharged GDI engines, 7-speed DCT at Frankfurt

Air pollution could claim 6.6 million lives per year by 2050, double current rate; small domestic fires and ag the worst offenders

If air pollution emissions continue to rise at the current rate, some 6.6 million people could prematurely die annually by 2050, double the current rate of 3.3 million people per year, according to a study carried out by a team led by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz. The largest sources of air pollution are not industry and transport but small domestic fires and agriculture. Results of the study are published in the journal Nature.

Exposure to air pollution is particularly acute in Asia, especially in China and India, where three-quarters of the world’s pollution-related deaths occur. The team headed by Johannes Lelieveld, Director at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, reported that 1.4 million people per year in China and 650,000 people in India die every year as a consequence of air pollution. In the EU exposure to fine particles and ozone claims 180,000 lives a year, including 35,000 in Germany. In many countries, air pollution accounts for roughly ten-times more deaths than road accidents.

Lelieveld, his colleague Andrea Pozzer and their colleagues in the USA, Cyprus and Saudi Arabia investigated for the first time how mortality rates are affected by various emission sources, such as industry, transport, agriculture, fossil fuel-fired power plants, as well as domestic energy use. The latter category includes diesel generators, small stoves and smoky open wood fires, which many people in Asia use for heating and cooking. They also calculated the mortality rates in individual countries and the proportion of deaths due to various causes, which can support policy making.

Business as usual. The color scale represents the increase in deaths due to an expected stronger air pollution: white - no increase; red - 9000 deaths more per year. Credit: Nature, Lelieveld et al. Click to enlarge.

Lelieveld’s team focused on the most critical air pollutants: PM2.5 and ozone. They used a global atmospheric chemistry model to calculate the concentrations of pollutants and to provide data for locations that are not monitored by air quality measurements. They then combined the results with epidemiological data.

We know rather well from statistical epidemiological studies in Europe and the US with several hundred thousand participants how specific pollutant concentrations affect mortality rates.

—Johannes Lelieveld

However, Lelieveld points out that these data are not representative of many megacities in Asia, where air pollution is much higher than in European and American cities. The team therefore used a refined method to determine the impact of extreme smog in those locations.

Nearly three-quarters of the deaths are due to strokes and heart attacks, and 27% to respiratory diseases and lung cancer. According to epidemiological studies, fine particulate matter leads to cerebrovascular, heart and pulmonary diseases and lung cancer, while ozone tends to cause pulmonary conditions such as chronic cough and shortness of breath. The microscopic particles penetrate deep into the lungs and possibly even into blood vessels. There is evidence that they contribute to the formation of vascular plaques, which increases the risk of heart attack and stroke. It is still unclear how various types of fine particles, such as soot, sulphates, organic substances and fine mineral particles, differ in their toxic effects.

Lelieveld and his colleagues were surprised when they examined the individual sources of air pollution. Much of the smog in India and China is caused by small domestic fires. Overall, one-third of premature deaths worldwide are attributable to this inefficient form of combustion.

A leading cause of air pollution in Europe, Russia, Turkey, Japan and the eastern United States is, surprisingly, agriculture. Ammonia enters the atmosphere as a result of the use of fertilizers and intensive livestock farming. It then undergoes a number of reactions to form ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate. These substances, in turn, are a major factor in the formation of small airborne particles. In fact, agriculture is the cause of one-fifth of all deaths due to air pollution. In some countries, for example in the Ukraine, Russia and Germany, that figure is over 40%.

Other major sources are fossil-fuel fired power plants, industry, biomass combustion and motor vehicles. Taken together, they account for another third of premature deaths. Just under a fifth of premature deaths are attributed to natural dust sources, particularly desert dust in North Africa and the Middle East.

Lelieveld believes that the high number of smog-related deaths in Germany compared to other European countries is due chiefly to the country’s central location in Europe—i.e., Germans have to breathe the polluted air from other countries.

On the other hand, Germany—densely populated with much industry, intensive agriculture and high traffic densities—causes a considerable amount of air pollution itself. Traffic, to which the researchers attribute only 5% of deaths worldwide, accounts for 20% of deaths in Germany, or about 7,000 lives a year. Thus, twice as many people die from the effects of vehicle emissions than from road accidents.

Most recently, Lelieveld and his colleagues predicted how the situation is likely to change in the coming decades. They assumed a business-as-usual scenario in which emissions continue to rise at current rates and are not curbed by new legislation. Based on that assumption, pollution-related mortality in South Asia and East Asia would double by 2050. The number of smog-induced deaths worldwide could rise to 6.6 million per year. Pollution-related mortality in Europe and the USA is likely to increase moderately, especially in big cities.


  • Jos Lelieveld, John S. Evans, Despina Giannadaki, Mohammed Fnais und Andrea Pozzer (2015) “The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale” Nature doi: 10.1038/nature15371



World-wide, evidence based crowd sourcing should help solve this.

As Harvey has earlier commented the ubiquitous smart phone can check the air you breathe, & the water you drink.
With an inexpensive sensor a smart phone [micro-computer] can sample these, & then communicate the results.


Why should I be concerned ? The advanced countries, (or really NAFTA), have developed and implemented the cleanup technologies to negate Air Pollution. If some third world cesspool ruled by some leftist kleptocratic dictator, hasten't got up off its duff to implement the technologies provided to them essentially for free, I have little sympathy.

Let their own populations demand Clean Air and they will get it.

I for one am satisfied the left-wing idiots who talk a good show but don't actually do anything have lost out in Europe.

After decades of sanctimonious delay, regulatory obfuscation and pious bovine scatology, they are actually implementing NAFTA equivalent cleanup regulations in force in NAFTA since the 1980s, 35 years ago. Their Air will clear and concern will abate, and become as certifiably clean as all but small pockets of North America now enjoys.


Alberta's (reported) emissions (air, ground and water polution) associated with tar sands operations are extremely high but the real total emissions may be twice as high as the reported ones in many cases.

Burning fossil fuels and bio-fuels will have to be curtailed worldwide for our own good/health and to keep GHG from rising too fast.


The ubiquitous low tech coal power plant, powering most the countries power needs indicate the BEV would not be friendly environmental technology. Also, since the car is so expensive and sales projections so minimal. Compare that with high blend ethanol fuel that can readily be utilized in most current day ICE and do so usually at a cost savings. That the use of such fuel will spur farm argonomics since the product is a cash crop. This would attract a new generation of competent farmers whom can apply new technology, new equipment, and advance the state of farm technology to feed more countrymen per acre, lower cost, and lower environmental harm to achieve higher ratings of fuel sales. Adding to the friendly environmental fuel, the cellulosic and waste ethanol of premium value. Much can be accomplished with minimal cost to taxpayers such as the attractiveness of decreasing of imported fuel costs, decreasing of a major plume of GWG per processing of waste ethanol and elimination of rotting plant matter. This is especially attractive given the need to maximize forest growth and decrease forest fire danger. Note: think of the quick value of higher blend ethanol can achieve and the new auto company Elio whom took just the opposite approach to expensive BEV. They utilize low technology solutions such as high reliable parts with low cost and design a car per most important energy saving features. A ultra low air drag and light vehicle. This car advertised at $6,800 new and achieves 84 mpg on highway.


A much lower cost vehicle produced in India did not sell very well because it was looked down by potential buyers.

Unfortunately, the majority still want very large, Heavy, musle type stylish vehicles regardless of the the fuel consumption!

An attitude change will take time.

Brent Jatko

@ Emily: But when will the Elio arrive? It's had a series of delays such that I'm beginning to question their credibility.


Good question. Engineering just finished engine testing. I think the company realizes they will not have a 2rd chance. Everything must be perfect upon product intro. Extremely challenging to build a car company as Elon Musk knows. Paul Elio is an auto engineer and owned ISG. He started this venture in '08 but lost all resources in recession. He survived with odd jobs including roofing work. Billionaire, Lichter came to his rescue with $20m funding and his GM bankruptcy award of production plant in Louisiana. The company has received 41,000 non refundable deposits for $17 million capital and represents $280m in production orders. They claim $300 million required before revenues start to flow. They are in line for Energy Department loan and going for new tax law 506c startup funding which allows non wealthy to invest $15k. It is an incredible story. The car has ultra low air drag. Meets all safety standards and roomy as the passengers sit in tandem. Behind the 2rd passenger trunk space. It wouldn't compete with SUV market, but viable for used car alternative shoppers whom like to buy new and want dependable low cost transportation. It would be easy and low cost to repair another advantage. Typical refueling and warm heater comfort.

The comments to this entry are closed.