Volvo Cars plans to launch large-scale autonomous driving experiment in China; 100 cars on public roads
07 April 2016
Volvo Cars plans to launch a large-scale autonomous driving experiment in China in which local drivers will test autonomous driving (AD) cars on public roads in everyday driving conditions. Volvo expects the experiment to involve up to 100 cars; in coming months, the automaker will begin negotiations with interested cities in China to see which is able to provide the necessary permissions, regulations and infrastructure to allow the experiment to go ahead.
Volvo believes the introduction of AD technology promises to reduce car accidents as well as free up congested roads, reduce pollution and allow drivers to use their time in their cars more valuably.
At a seminar held in Beijing today (“Autonomous driving – could China take the lead?”), Håkan Samuelsson, president and chief executive of Volvo, welcomed the positive steps China has taken to put in place to develop autonomous driving technologies, but also encouraged it to do more to try and speed up the implementation of the regulations that will oversee autonomous driving cars in future.
There are multiple benefits to AD cars. That is why governments need to put in place the legislation to allow AD cars onto the streets as soon as possible. The car industry cannot do it all by itself. We need governmental help.
—Håkan Samuelsson
The introduction of AD cars promises to revolutionise China’s roads in four main areas: safety, congestion, pollution and time saving. Independent research has revealed that AD has the potential to reduce the number of car accidents very significantly. Up to 90% of all accidents are also caused by human error, something that mostly disappears with AD cars.
In terms of congestion, AD cars allow traffic to move more smoothly, reducing traffic jams and by extension cutting dangerous emissions and associated pollution. Lastly, reduced congestion saves drivers valuable time.
Samuelsson welcomed moves by regulators and car makers in the US and Europe to develop AD cars and infrastructure, but also encouraged all the parties involved to work more constructively together to avoid patchwork global regulations, technological duplication and needless expense.
AD is not just about car technology. We need the right rules and the right laws. It is natural for us to work together. Our starting point is that both the public and private sectors stand to benefit from new technologies and industries, so it is better to build bridges and work together than to all go in different directions.
—Håkan Samuelsson
One of many legal changes needed is that cars with a fully autonomous driver pilot should not be required to be sold with human controls like steering wheel, gas pedal and braking pedal. These human controls could be an optional feature that cost extra for those who order their car with them. Also the legislation that requires a mechanical connection for steering wheel and brakes should be abandoned because they introduce unnecessary cost and engineering difficulties that also severely delay global product launches for left driver seated and right driver seated cars. The mechanical connection can be replaced by a simple power and data connection to the steering wheel, gas and braking pedal. Also, there should be a requirement for redundancy of all mission critical systems like the data and power connection to the braking pedal. With regard to autonomous cars the law should say that fully autonomous cars both have a primary autopilot and a secondary autopilot that takes over in case the first one malfunctions. Humans will nearly never drive themselves in a fully autonomous car even if they could because of available controls and therefore they are not ready to take over and function like a secondary auto pilot. So the law need to require that such carsare made with a fully redundant autopilot system.
Another thing is to ban the use of side mirrors because they introduce unnecessary air drag that increases fuel consumption. Instead require video based “side mirrors” and require redundancy for that system.
Posted by: Account Deleted | 07 April 2016 at 06:52 AM
If 100+ ADVs can be used in China, many other countries would soon go the same way.
Early ADVs may have to be equipped with some sort of manual controls, to drive the vehicle to the nearest safe location, when automated controls have failed.
Eventually, voice commands should be enough to override the automated commands.
Posted by: HarveyD | 07 April 2016 at 08:55 AM
How will Chinese driver respond to not being able to run over pedestrians?
Posted by: dursun | 07 April 2016 at 10:54 AM
We may be the specialists with over 40,000 kills/year?
Posted by: HarveyD | 09 April 2016 at 08:54 AM