Researchers gain better insight into transformation of steel; managing nucleation could limit need for alloying elements
Researchers at TU Delft have shed new light on the process of nucleation in the polymorphic transformation of solid materials—specifically, steel. Polymorphism is the ability of a solid material to exist in more than one phase or crystal structure. Polymorphism may occur in metals, alloys, ceramics, minerals, polymers, and pharmaceutical substances.
In an open access paper published in Nature’s Scientific Reports, the team presented in-situ three-dimensional x-ray diffraction (3DXRD) microscopy measurements of the ferrite (α) to austenite (γ) transformation in steel during heating, which the team performed at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility.
By monitoring the transformation process using X-rays, they were able to identify the places and their properties that were the most likely starting points for the nucleation process of the transition from ferrite to austenite.
Alloys and microstructures. Up until now, the most widely used method for changing the properties of steel is the addition of elements affecting the structure, and therefore the properties, of the resulting steel type—i.e., alloys. Alloys can consist of more than ten different types of elements, making both manufacturing them and recycling them complicated and often expensive.
Insight into the nucleation process may yield a solution. If one could direct this process, one would theoretically be able to create microstructures that give the material the desired macroscopic properties, without the addition of other (rare) elements.
Steel must be both strong and sufficiently deformable in order to, for example, make components lighter in the automotive industry. When manufacturing so-called electrical steel for transformer cores and fire-resistant steels for high-rise buildings, you are also looking for specific properties. The nucleation process is the key to limiting the use of alloying elements in these processes. We have now found places where an iron crystal tends to nucleate.
If you can make metals less complex—i.e. use less alloying elements and do more with the microstructure—you can also keep the bulk metals simpler. That would make production less expensive, and it would also make it easier to reuse the metals when recycling a mixture of different steel grades, because they will have the same or similar composition. You would therefore have to experiment more with the structure than with the alloying. The next step is to replace critical alloying elements in metals and to reduce the number of different alloying elements and the concentration of the alloying elements by optimizing the microstructure.—TU Delft materials scientist Erik Offerman
Offerman formulated a hypothesis on the activation energy of the nucleation process fourteen years ago, which was harshly criticized by one of the experts in the field at that time. With this article, he was finally able to prove his hypothesis.
This research was partly made possible by the Netherlands technology foundation STW.
H. Sharma, J. Sietsma & S. E. Offerman (2016) “Preferential Nucleation during Polymorphic Transformations” Scientific Reports doi: 10.1038/srep30860