Study suggests focusing on cold starts in gasoline cars as target for emissions reduction
22 August 2016
A new study suggests that focusing on a gasoline-fueled vehicle’s cold start is the best target for future design changes to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants. The researchers are presenting their work today at the 252nd National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS) in Philadelphia.
Although the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reported that air is cleaner today than it was in the 1970s, more than 130 million people in the US still live in places where smog or particle pollution rises to unhealthful levels. Smog can cause coughing and shortness of breath, and can aggravate asthma or trigger asthma attacks. Much of this haze is formed from volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, and fine particulate matter from tailpipe emissions.
The main goal of our project was to find out how effective regulations of gasoline vehicle emissions have been at reducing the formation of smog. It was also a very forward-thinking study in anticipation of how cars that meet future emissions standards will lead to reductions in air pollution.
—Greg Drozd, Ph.D.
To find out what vehicles on the road are currently emitting, Drozd and colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley; Carnegie Mellon University; the University of California, San Diego; and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology rented 25 gasoline-powered cars, including two hybrids, from residents in the Los Angeles area. The vehicle ages ranged from 2 to 20 years.
The researchers took the cars to the Haagen-Smit Laboratory funded by the California Air Resources Board and drove them on a giant treadmill. Using a proton-transfer reaction mass spectrometer, they were able to measure a wider range of compounds coming out of tailpipes more rapidly than in previous reports.
They detected a cocktail of chemicals, including fuel components such as benzene, toluene and xylenes, and incomplete combustion products including acetaldehyde, formaldehyde and acetonitrile. But overall, their concentrations were very low for the newer cars.
The clearest result was how effective emissions controls have become for organic gases. New vehicles less than 2 years old emitted as little as 1 percent of the total amount of organic gases that a 20-year-old vehicle emitted. Very few studies have tested new cars for these gases.
—Greg Drozd
The researchers also found that almost all emissions in properly functioning, new vehicles came out immediately after starting the cars when their engines were cold. But once new cars warmed up, they had to be driven 100 to 300 miles to match the levels that came out in the first 30 seconds of the engine turning on.
Our work shows that for newer cars we should have fast measurements, so that we can then more accurately predict emissions from cars in the real world.
—Greg Drozd
Even malfunctioning and older cars would have to travel 50 to 100 miles, respectively, to release the same amount of emissions as they would within the first minute of a cold start, Drozd said. This concentrated release very early in a car’s operation occurs because its catalytic converter, which breaks down VOCs, hasn’t had a chance to warm up yet. The faster it can heat up, the lower the emissions could be.
That tells us how we need to inform future vehicle engineering. We need to think a lot about that cold start. That’s still the best place to reduce emissions.
—Greg Drozd
The researchers’ findings could also help the EPA model future emissions standards as the US works to lower them.
The California Air Resources Board provided funding for the study.
It is about time! This is the zone for plug in technology or battery power. They should study ethanol fuel as well. Some ideas to minimize cold start emissions. Propane fuel for warm up period. High pressure air pumping warm up. Hot boiler vaporized fuel for startup. Propane flame or electrical power assisted warm up of coolant or exhaust heat for cat. Thermal tank for hot coolant return.
Posted by: Trees | 22 August 2016 at 04:45 AM
One more problem that electric cars don't have.
Even the cabin can be pre-heated from mains power.
Posted by: electric-car-insider.com | 22 August 2016 at 07:43 AM
EPI, indeed: however, we should look at the problem regardless as EVs have such a small market share.
It is ironic that many of Trees' suggestions are plug in solutions (as he notes).
I suppose the question is what is the cost of adding this sort of technology to ICEs to cheaply alleviate the problem (so that it gets adopted).
Also, would people be prepared to wait N seconds before starting off ? (1 < N < 30) for instance.
Posted by: mahonj | 22 August 2016 at 11:00 AM
It is good to see this being brought up again. There are a number of papers and patents on "vacuum-insulated catalytic converters", which deal with cold engine startup.
These devices are not only vacuum insulated, but include phase change materials to hold the heat for about 24 hours. They were likely too expensive when first developed, but may now need a second look.
A quick google search for more reading: http://www.google.com/patents/US7431896
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/legosti/old/7072.pdf
Posted by: nopec | 22 August 2016 at 11:15 AM